JSG JMIR Serious Games JMIR Serious Games 2291-9279 JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada v12i1e55905 39186776 10.2196/55905 Original Paper Original Paper Exploring the Psychological Effects and Physical Exertion of Using Different Movement Interactions in Casual Exergames That Promote Active Microbreaks: Quasi-Experimental Study Eysenbach Gunther Cahill Naomi Aygün Cihan Xu Fei Berglund Aseel PhD 1
Department of Computer and Information Science Linköping University Campus Valla, B-house Linköping, 58329 Sweden 46 0732703862 aseel.berglund@liu.se
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-2218 Orädd Helena MSc 1 https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3674-3946 Department of Computer and Information Science Linköping University Linköping Sweden Corresponding Author: Aseel Berglund aseel.berglund@liu.se 2024 26 8 2024 12 e55905 28 12 2023 25 4 2024 19 6 2024 15 7 2024 ©Aseel Berglund, Helena Orädd. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (https://games.jmir.org), 26.08.2024. 2024

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Serious Games, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://games.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

 Background

Prolonged sedentary behavior, such as sitting or reclining, has consistently been identified as a stand-alone risk factor for heightened cardiometabolic risk and overall mortality. Conversely, interrupting sedentary periods by incorporating short, active microbreaks has been shown to mitigate the negative effects of sedentary behavior. Casual exergames, which mix elements of casual gaming with physical activity, are one prospective intervention to reduce sedentary behavior because they require physical exertion. Casual exergames have shown promise in fostering emotional and physical advantages when played in specific circumstances. However, little research exists on how different types of movement interactions impact the psychological effects as well as the physical exertion of playing casual exergames.

 Objective

The primary aim of this work was to explore the psychological effects and physical exertion of playing casual exergames lasting 2 minutes. More precisely, the investigation focused on comparing upper body and full body movement interactions. In addition, the work examined variations in body positions, considering both standing and seated positions during upper body movement interactions.

 Methods

Two casual exergames were developed and investigated through 2 quasi-experimental studies. In study 1, we investigated how players’ perceptions of control, exertion, and immersion were affected by using upper body as opposed to full body exergame controllers when playing casual exergames. In study 2, we investigated differences in positive affect, performance, enjoyment, and exertion when playing casual exergames with upper body movement interactions in seated and standing positions.

 Results

Study 1 showed that perceived control was significantly higher for upper body movement interactions than for full body movement interactions (P=.04), but there were no significant differences regarding perceived exertion (P=.15) or immersion (P=.66). Study 2 showed that positive affect increased significantly for both standing (P=.003) and seated (P=.001) gameplay. The participants in the standing gameplay group showed slightly higher actual exertion; however, there were no differences between the groups in terms of positive affect, perceived exertion, enjoyment, or performance.

 Conclusions

Casual exergames controlled by upper body movement interactions in seated gameplay can produce similar psychological effects and physical exertion as upper body movement interactions in standing gameplay and full body movement interactions. Therefore, upper body and seated casual exergames should not be overlooked as a suitable microbreak activity.

 physical activity exergames casual exergames enjoyment exertion motion-based games Introduction Background

High levels of sedentary behavior (such as sitting or lying down) [1] and low levels of moderate to vigorous physical exercise are characteristics of an inactive lifestyle [1,2]. The people most vulnerable to the negative effects of an inactive lifestyle are those who have highly sedentary lives with minimal exercise [3,4]. The advances in domestic and workplace technologies, along with the changes in personal and public transportation, have decreased the necessity for physical activity, leading to increased sedentary lifestyles among populations [5]. The frequency of light-intensity activities (such as walking and performing household chores) in outdoor and nonoffice occupations has decreased in the last few decades [5]. Sedentary behavior is a widespread issue affecting various groups of people (eg, children [6-8], youth [9], and adults [10,11]) across different demographics and settings. While watching television, reading, using a computer, and playing video games are discretionary activities [12], sitting during school [6-8], university [9], or work [10,11] hours is generally nondiscretionary [12]. Therefore, researchers have investigated the impact of sedentary behavior [5]. Numerous studies have demonstrated the connection between excessive sedentary behavior and unfavorable health indicators or results [13-15], regardless of how much time is spent exercising to counteract the sedentary behavior [16]; for instance, when physical activity is taken into account, adults who sit 10 hours a day, as opposed to 1 hour a day, still show a 34% higher risk of increased mortality [17].

Incorporating active microbreaks has demonstrated the potential to mitigate the adverse consequences linked to sedentary behavior [14,18] and improve people’s moods [19]; for example, 2- to 3-minute microbreaks with a light activity level every 30 minutes can positively impact mental and physical health [20-22]. Another study showed that over the course of 8 weeks, individuals who were encouraged to stand up and move every 30 minutes for 1 to 2 minutes during the workday significantly decreased their sedentary behavior by approximately 36 minutes per workday [23]. Thus, encouraging frequent, short breaks from sitting could improve health outcomes related to the risk of chronic diseases [23].

Exergames—video games that use movement and physical exertion during gameplay—have been shown to be effective in providing a good psychological experience [24] while also offering advantages for the player’s health [25]. Exergames have been created with a variety of health-related goals in mind, including rehabilitation [26] and better mental health [27]. Exergames can increase physical activity [28,29], decrease sedentary behavior [30-33], and promote more active breaks [34-37]. Exergaming has been shown to achieve both moderate [31,38] and vigorous [38] levels of exertion, suggesting that exergames have the potential to serve as an alternative to conventional exercise [39].

Casual exergames are easily learned and quickly accessible exergames with simple rules, designed to motivate players to engage in moderate-intensity exercise during short play sessions [33]. Incorporating active microbreaks using casual exergames has demonstrated the potential to interrupt sedentary behavior [32,37,40]. Playing casual exergames can also induce positive affective states [31,32,41], which can reduce stress levels [42] and enhance overall well-being [43]. Previous studies have demonstrated that casual exergames can be enjoyable and generate appropriate levels of exertion [31,32,40]. However, little research has been conducted on the psychological experience and physical exertion when playing casual exergames [44-73] or on using different types of movement interactions in casual exergames [45].

When developing exergames, it is important to consider both the psychological and physiological aspects of the player’s experience [46-48]. According to the dual flow model, the attractiveness of an exergame is determined by balancing the player’s skill level with the exergame’s challenge level, resulting in a state of psychological flow; and the effectiveness of the exergame is determined by balancing the player’s fitness level with the exergame’s physical intensity level [35,49]. As the optimal psychological experience and the optimal physiological experience are not necessarily aligned, focusing exclusively on boosting in-game experience may risk reducing health-related advantages [48]. On the basis of the dual flow model, movements with great psychological attractiveness and physiological effectiveness should be used [48]. The psychological and physiological aspects are also connected because the level of enjoyment experienced during playing exergames is correlated with increased exertion levels [44].

One aspect of psychological attractiveness in the exergame experience is immersion, defined in the context of video games as the degree to which the player participates in a game [50] and loses awareness of their surroundings while playing [51]. Immersion is closely related to the concept of flow, which is defined as the psychological state in which one is fully involved in an activity, losing self-consciousness [52]. Immersion impacts the psychological attractiveness of exergames [53] and can be achieved when players have control over the game’s actions [50]. While both flow and immersion revolve around player engagement in a game, flow pertains to the general motivation and enjoyment of an activity, while immersion is more directly tied to the user experience and can be seen as a quantifiable aspect of the game experience that relates to both flow and motivation [44]. Movement-based controllers can enhance immersion levels by allowing for natural interaction, leading to increased well-being associated with physical exercise [53]. As control is one of the first stages in creating an immersive experience, it should be considered as a factor that might affect the player’s immersive experience and, in turn, the casual exergame’s psychological attractiveness [50]. Higher control can also contribute to improved performance, which is positively related to game enjoyment [54-56].

The characteristics of players’ movements when exergaming are influenced by the characteristics of the exergame, the difficulty of remaining motivated without sacrificing the quality of the movements, the exergaming experience even when it is of short duration, and the scoring of points [57]. For the physical exertion of playing exergames, the type of movement interaction used in the exergame is an important design decision [47,58]. One decision revolves around using upper body or full body movements. Specifically, for casual exergames designed to target upper body movements, it is worth investigating whether the use of upper body movements can encourage sufficient levels of exertion. To induce positive health-related outcomes, it has previously been stated that casual exergame play should produce a moderate level of exertion [33]. Previous research has shown that upper body movements in exergames have lower potential for increasing exertion compared to full body movements [46,59]. A meta-analysis discovered that lower body and full body exergames produced more energy expenditure than upper body exergames; thus, the authors concluded that upper body exergaming movements are insufficient for achieving adequate energy expenditure [23]. Another study measured movements during gameplay of 3 different exergames using upper body and full body movements and discovered that adequate physical activity required full body movements [58]. However, another meta-analysis showed that exergames with continuous upper body movements have the potential to meet the recommendations for a moderate-intensity activity level [39]; for example, playing Wii boxing exergames with upper body movement interactions has been shown to elicit a moderate-intensity activity level [39,60-63]. On the basis of the mixed results of previous studies, it is worth further investigating whether upper body movements can elicit similar levels of exertion as full body movements for casual exergames as well as how the psychological experience is affected.

Another factor that can affect the psychological and physiological aspects of casual exergames is whether the exergame is designed to be played in a seated or standing position. One study comparing seated and standing gameplay in an exergame for individuals with mobility impairments found that the participants playing seated had higher perceived exertion [64]. However, because the participants chose gameplay mode depending on their abilities instead of being randomly selected for each condition, other factors apart from the seated or standing position could have affected the results. In addition, the psychological effects experienced could have influenced exertion levels because the seated players rated the exergame as more usable than the standing players. By contrast, another study comparing seated with standing positions when playing an adapted game mat exergame showed that participants had lower energy expenditure, perceived exertion, and heart rate when they played seated than when they played standing [65]. This aligns with research outside of the exergame domain that shows that performing an otherwise sedentary activity while standing requires more energy expenditure than performing the same activity while seated [66,67]. However, when we compared upper body movement interactions in seated and standing positions for a casual exergame, we found that there were no significant differences in perceived exertion between seated and standing gameplay [41]. Furthermore, an additional study compared playing 8 to 10 minutes of a boxing exergame in standing and seated positions and found that the seated position resulted in lower energy expenditure than the standing position, while there was no significant difference in perceived exertion [68]. As “Every move counts towards better health” according to the World Health Organization [69], even if exergame activities do not exceed recommended intensity levels, playing exergames is superior to being inactive [39] and might lead to higher exercise adherence [70]. Furthermore, microbreaks with light-intensity exercise every 30 minutes during the day offer both physical and mental health benefits [20]. Therefore, it could be argued that playing upper body casual exergames while seated is better than not playing at all.

In terms of psychological effects, research shows that both standing and seated gameplay generally have the same level of enjoyment [41,64,65,71,72]. However, in 3 of these previous studies [64,65,72], no statistical analysis comparing sitting and standing positions was performed, and in 2 of the studies, different movements were used in the sitting and standing conditions [65,71]. Thus, the generalizability of the results regarding the effect of standing versus sitting positions on enjoyment is limited. On the basis of the limitations of previous studies, we statistically compared 2-minute seated and standing casual exergame play with the same movement interactions in a previous study and found no significant difference between playing seated or standing in terms of positive affect and enjoyment [41].

 Objectives

This work is an extension of a conference paper on full body and upper body movement interactions [45]. The aim of this work was to study the psychological effects and physical exertion of playing short-duration casual exergames lasting 2 minutes based on upper body movement interactions designed to promote active microbreaks to interrupt sedentary behavior. Considering the limited research and the mixed results of the psychological effects and physical exertion of different movement interactions in casual exergames, we specifically wanted to explore the psychological effects and physical exertion of upper body compared to full body movement interactions (study 1) and standing compared to seated positions for upper body movement interactions (study 2). The following research questions (RQs) were addressed:

RQ1: How do casual exergames based on upper body compared to full body movements differ in terms of their psychological effects and physical exertion?

RQ2: How do upper body casual exergames played in seated positions compared to standing positions differ in terms of their psychological attractiveness and physical exertion levels?

 Methods Overview

To answer the RQs, we conducted 2 studies using distinct in-house–developed casual exergames (Crossing and Beaver) for each study. The casual exergames were developed using the open-source game engine Godot. Each round of play lasts 2 minutes. Both casual exergames can be played on a computer screen equipped with a webcam that captures players’ movements. To enable players to observe their movements in relation to on-screen events, the webcam feed is displayed in the top left corner of the casual exergame interface. The actual time and collected points are displayed in the upper right corner of the interface.

Both studies were performed at a game and cosplay festival. People walking by were asked whether they wanted to participate in a study about exergames. Those interested were provided with detailed information, and if willing to participate, they read through the information materials and signed a consent form. Participants aged <18 years needed their guardian to sign the form on their behalf. By recruiting participants who were naturally interested in games, we aimed to evaluate the impact of exergames on a population that is likely to engage with such interventions in real-world settings. This setting provided a unique opportunity to observe the effects of exergames on individuals already motivated by gaming, which we believe is crucial for understanding the design and immediate effects of these interventions.

 Study 1: Upper Body Versus Full Body Movement Interactions Casual Exergame (Crossing): Design and Interaction

The casual exergame Crossing is based on the classic arcade game Frogger (Figure 1). Using a well-known game genre and basic game mechanics is known to make it easier for players to identify and comprehend the game mechanics [73,74]. In Crossing, players control a rabbit navigating roads, rivers, and rail lines, earning points for forward jumps. Players can also perform sideways jumps, which aid in avoiding obstacles but do not contribute to the accumulation of points. If players collide with vehicles or fall into rivers, the rabbit dies, prompting a 5-second restart. The points acquired before each death are retained, but the waiting period during the restart impacts overall performance.

(A) Demonstration of forward movement for upper body movement interactions for (B) the casual exergame Crossing. (C) Demonstration of forward movement for full body movement interactions. Arrows show the direction of movement.

To support our research, 2 different movement controllers were developed for Crossing: an upper body condition and a full body condition. In the upper body condition, players raise their hands from near their bodies up to their shoulders and above their heads, starting with their arms stretched downward. The rabbit on the screen leaps forward as soon as the hands cross over the head. The player must repeat the movement and extend their arms to the starting position to make the rabbit jump again. In the full body condition, players raise their left or right knee over the hip to make the rabbit jump forward. The rabbit jumps forward when the knee is lifted above the hip. The player must stretch their leg back down to the starting position and repeat the maneuver with either leg to make the rabbit jump once more. To make the rabbit jump to the side in both upper body and full body conditions, players extend a single arm corresponding to the intended direction—raising the right arm for a jump to the right and the left for a jump to the left, unlike extending both arms upward.

Previous research has indicated the importance of shifting the player's focus away from the physical exertion they are experiencing while playing the exergame [58,73]. When it comes to body focus, Crossing’s fast-paced, time-limited gameplay forces players to pay attention to their movements and prevents them becoming self-conscious. The game’s obstacles might kill players if they remain motionless for an extended period of time, further contributing to the game’s fast pace [73].

 Participants and Procedure

In all, 80 people participated in the study. The participants’ ages ranged from 11 to 54 (mean 25, SD 7) years. Of the 80 participants, 56 (70%) identified as man, 17 (21%) as woman, and 5 (6%) as nonbinary, while 2 (3%) reported that they were unsure about their gender identity. Of the 80 participants, 51 (64%) reported having played exergames multiple times, 25 (31%) reported having played exergames once, and 4 (5%) reported never having played exergames.

After signing the consent form, all participants watched an instructional video about how to play and interact with the exergame. Participants were then asked to stand 1.5 meters away from a computer screen equipped with a webcam. The webcam was adjusted so that the participant was clearly visible, and they were asked to demonstrate the movements they should use. Next, participants played one 2-minute round and then filled out a questionnaire (Figure 2) that included (1) demographic questions, (2) the Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale [40], and (3) the perceived immersion and control subscales of the Exergame Enjoyment Questionnaire (EEQ) [44]. We alternated between controllers for each new participant, resulting in half the participants (40/80, 50%) playing Crossing in the upper body condition and the other half (40/80, 50%) playing in the full body condition.

Study 1 procedure.

 Measures

Physical exertion and psychological effects were the main measures in the study. To measure the physical exertion of playing Crossing, the Borg RPE scale was used to measure perceived exertion [75,76] because it is a valid instrument for measuring exercise intensity [76] and has been used previously to measure perceived exertion when playing casual exergames [33]. The Borg RPE scale ranges from 6 (indicating no exertion at all) to 20 (indicating maximal exertion) [77], with ratings of 11 to 12 corresponding to light intensity, 13 to 14 corresponding to moderate intensity, and 15 to 16 corresponding to hard intensity [78] (Table 1).

Correspondence between the Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) score and percentage of maximum heart rate [78-80].

Maximum heart rate (%) Intensity Borg RPE score
20-39 No exertion at all 6-7
40-59 Very light 8-10
60-69 Light 11-12
70-79 Moderate (somewhat hard) 13-14
80-89 Hard (heavy) 15-16
90-99 Very hard 17-18
100 Maximal 19-20

To measure psychological effects, the perceived immersion and control subscales of the EEQ were used (Table 2) [81]. The EEQ perceived immersion subscale consists of 5 items and measures the degree to which the player is fully engaged and involved in the activity [81]. The EEQ perceived control subscale consists of 4 items and measures the degree to which players can directly affect the outcome of the exergame [81]. All items were measured on a 5-point Likert scale: strongly disagree (score=1), disagree (score=2), neutral (score=3), agree (score=4), and strongly agree (score=5).

The Exergame Enjoyment Questionnaire (EEQ) perceived immersion and control items [81].

Item Scale Item wording
Immersion 1a EEQ immersion I did not feel like I wanted to keep playing.
Immersion 2 EEQ immersion I felt like I lost track of time while playing.
Immersion 3 EEQ immersion I felt a strong sense of being in the world of the game to the point that I was unaware of my surroundings.
Immersion 4 EEQ immersion I felt emotionally attached to the game.
Immersion 5 EEQ immersion I was focused on the game.
Control 1 EEQ control I felt that it was easy to familiarize myself with the game controls.
Control 2a EEQ control I felt that it was difficult to understand how the game works.
Control 3 EEQ control I felt in control over the game.
Control 4 EEQ control I felt that the game reacted quickly to my movements.

aReversed item.

To provide descriptive data, the number of movements during the play session was measured by counting the number of movements each participant executed while playing the exergame, encompassing both the forward and sideways jumping movements for the rabbit. In addition, each participant’s performance was measured by recording their final score.

 Statistical Analysis

A between-subjects analysis was conducted for the players in the upper body condition compared to those in the full body condition using SPSS software (version 29.0; IBM Corp). Before the analysis, the items immersion 1 and control 2 were reversed, and internal consistency was measured for the perceived immersion and control subscales of the EEQ using Cronbach α. The Cronbach α value for the 5-item perceived immersion subscale was 0.66, and the Cronbach α value for the 4-item perceived control subscale was 0.68, both close to the satisfactory threshold value of 0.70 [82]. As several of the variables did not meet the assumption of normality and had no significant outliers [83], we chose to use the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to answer RQ1. The condition was used as the independent variable and perceived control, perceived immersion, and perceived exertion as the dependent variables. Approximate values of the effect size r were calculated by dividing the z score for each test by the square root of the number of cases (n=80) [84], following the guidelines of 0.2 corresponding to a small effect size, 0.5 to a medium effect size, and 0.8 to a large effect size [85]. To complement the analysis, a Spearman correlation matrix was produced looking at the correlation between perceived control, perceived immersion, and perceived exertion for both conditions, following the guidelines of ≤0.35 corresponding to a weak correlation, 0.36 to 0.67 corresponding to a moderate correlation, and 0.68 to 1 corresponding to a strong correlation [86].

 Study 2: Standing Versus Seated Positions for Upper Body Movement Interactions

The second study replicated our previous study on seated and standing exergames [41], using a different casual exergame and with the addition of using the participant’s actual heart rate as an objective measure of exertion.

Casual Exergame (Beaver): Design and Interaction

The in-house–developed casual exergame Beaver was used in this study. The goal of Beaver is to hit targets on the screen as fast as possible within the time limit of 2 minutes. In the exergame, beavers holding target boards appear on the screen in 6 different positions according to a specific pattern. The player receives points based on how fast the target is hit (slow hit=1 point, moderately fast hit=3 points, and very fast hit=5 points). The order in which the targets appear follows different patterns but is repeated over 2 rounds, allowing players to learn the current pattern and hit the targets faster in the second round. To hit the targets, the player moves the arm on the opposite side across the body toward the target’s position, as shown in Figure 3. Targets alternate between the left and right side of the player’s head, shoulders, and hips so that the player keeps hitting the targets across the torso with both arms. This movement is similar to boxing because prior research on boxing exergames has demonstrated that boxing-like movements can result in moderate levels of exertion [39,60-63]. The decision to avoid a boxing game graphics theme was to maintain consistency with the game-like, rather than sport-like, theme and appearance used in the Crossing exergame in study 1.

The casual exergame Beaver with boxing-like upper body movement interactions.

 Participants and Procedure

In all, 40 people participated in the study, and their ages ranged from 18 to 47 (mean 25.27, SD 6.357) years. Of the 40 participants, 23 (58%) identified as man, 12 (30%) as woman, and 4 (10%) as nonbinary, while 1 person (2%) reported that they were unsure about their gender identity. Of the 40 participants, 19 (48%) reported as work was their main occupation, 17 (42%) were students, 2 (5%) worked as well as studied, and 2 (5%) had some other main occupation. Of the 40 participants, 4 (10%) had never played an exergame, 17 (42%) had played an exergame at some point, 14 (35%) sometimes played exergames, 4 (10%) played exergames somewhat often, and 1 (2%) often played exergames.

After signing the consent form, participants answered a questionnaire that included (1) demographic questions and (2) the international, shortened version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [87,88]. A Polar Unite fitness tracker was fastened around each participant’s wrist to track their heart rate during the play sessions. The participants were then shown an instructional video that explained how to play the exergame. To avoid possible bias, the video was recorded in such a way that it was impossible to tell whether the instructor was sitting or standing. Conditions were alternated for each participant, resulting in half of the participants (20/40, 50%) playing Beaver in the sit-first condition (seated in a chair) and the other half (20/40, 50%) playing in the stand-first condition. Participants were placed 1.5 meters away from a computer screen equipped with a webcam in both conditions. The webcam was then adjusted so that the participant was clearly visible, and the participant was asked to demonstrate the movements they should use. Once the participant had confirmed that they had understood the exergame and movements by demonstrating them correctly, the fitness tracker was set to start logging the heart rate, and the participant started the first game session. The time was also noted to correlate the heart rate data to the questionnaire results. After the session ended, the final score was noted, while the participant filled in the second questionnaire, which included (1) the PANAS [87], (2) the Borg RPE scale [40], and (3) the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) [70,89]. Next, the participant was again guided to sit or stand in front of the computer in the position they had not played before. The webcam was adjusted to the new position, and the participant played a second round of the exergame. The starting time of the second gameplay session was again noted for purposes of later identification in the data. When the gameplay session ended, the heart rate data logging was stopped, and the final score of the second gameplay session was noted while the participant filled out the third and final questionnaire, which included the same scales as the second questionnaire. The entire procedure is shown in Figure 4.

Study 2 procedure.

 Measures

Physical exertion of playing exergames can be measured using subjective perception (eg, using the Borg RPE scale [75-77] as in study 1) and objective measures (eg, capturing the actual heart rate) [79]. As there is a strong correlation between heart rate and energy expenditure, heart rate monitors can be used to measure actual exertion in exergames [90]. Borg RPE scores and heart rate measures are positively correlated during exergame play [91]. Thus, integrating both subjective and objective data offers a comprehensive assessment of physical exertion, enhancing accuracy in evaluating exergame physical exertion.

The participant’s actual heart rate was measured using a Polar Unite fitness tracker fastened around their wrist during the gameplay sessions, while the perceived exertion was measured using the Borg RPE scale [75-77], which corresponds to the maximum heart rate [75,78] (Table 1). The fitness tracker logs the wearer’s heart rate during a recorded training session and displays the heart rate over time in a graph. The highest and average heart rates during the first gameplay session and the second gameplay session were compared to the participant’s estimated maximum heart rate (calculated using the following formula: maximum heart rate = 220 – age in years) to obtain a percentage used to determine exercise intensity.

After study 1, some potential issues with measuring immersion in very short exergames were discovered, as described in the Discussion section. Therefore, in study 2, psychological effects were instead measured in terms of affect, enjoyment, and performance. Positive and negative affect before and after playing Beaver were measured using the international, shortened version of the PANAS [88]. The PANAS was selected because of its established reliability and validity in assessing affect [92], its proven efficacy in measuring changes in affect before and after shorter interventions [93], and its frequent use in research on exergames [94]. The shortened PANAS contains 10 validated items—5 for positive affect and 5 for negative affect—and has a total score for both positive and negative affect that ranges from 5 to 25 based on the summation of its items [87]. In this study, only the positive affect scale of the PANAS was analyzed because the negative affect scale exhibited low variation and, as a result, issues with internal consistency, with values close to 0. As the positive and negative affect scales are uncorrelated and independent [88], eliminating the negative affect scale does not impact the findings related to the positive affect scale.

Physical activity enjoyment was measured using the shortened version of the PACES [70,89]. Five of the original 18 statements are included in the shortened version, which has demonstrated strong reliability for exergames across age groups [70]. In the PACES, the player rates how much they agree with each statement using a 7-point Likert scale.

Finally, performance was measured using the participants’ final scores. These scores indicated the number of times the participant had successfully jumped forward on the path.

 Statistical Analyses

Two main statistical analyses were conducted. First, a within-subjects comparison of the difference in positive affect before and after playing the first round was carried out for both the participants playing the first gameplay session seated and the participants playing the first gameplay session standing. The second analysis was a within-subjects comparison of the differences in heart rate, perceived exertion, affect, enjoyment, and performance between the seated and standing positions for each participant.

For the first analysis, Cronbach α was calculated for positive and negative affect before and after the first gameplay session for participants playing the first gameplay session standing and seated. Internal consistency was acceptable for positive affect before playing for both seated (0.67) and standing (0.75) gameplay, but while negative affect had acceptable consistency for seated (0.70) gameplay, it was low for standing gameplay (0.22). After playing 1 session of the exergame, the internal consistency for positive affect was high for both seated (0.83) and standing (0.86) gameplay, but, once again, the consistency for negative affect was low for standing (0.15) gameplay while remaining high for seated (0.89) gameplay. Because of the low internal consistency for negative affect, only positive affect was analyzed. To evaluate the difference in positive affect after playing 1 session of the exergame, the difference between the positive affect before and after playing the exergame was calculated. The assumption behind the dependent 2-tailed t test was checked in terms of outliers and normality. No outliers were found for either sitting or standing gameplay, and the Shapiro-Wilk test statistic showed that the standing group had no significant deviation from normality at a significance of P=.94. However, the seated group deviated from normality with a significance of P=.04, which is less than the threshold of P=.50. Therefore, the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank test was run on the positive affect before and after the first seated and standing gameplay sessions. Effect size was calculated using the formula r = z/sqrt(N) [84].

For the second analysis, the differences between each participant’s seated and standing gameplay were calculated. Cronbach α was calculated for the PACES (seated=0.83 and standing=0.83) as well as positive (seated=0.89 and standing=0.88) and negative (seated=0.78 and standing=0.73) affect. As all scales showed high internal consistency, their items were summed. Next, the differences between standing and seated values were calculated for the PACES, positive and negative affect, Borg RPE, percentage of maximum heart rate reached (highest and average), and game score for each participant and analyzed to check assumptions of normality. Negative affect had multiple extreme outliers and was heavily skewed with a Shapiro-Wilk significance of <.001 and was thus excluded from further analysis. No other score showed deviation from normality according to the Shapiro-Wilk test statistic (positive affect=.13, PACES=.50, Borg RPE=.07, highest heart rate percentage=.69, average heart rate percentage=.39, and game score=.50). While the game score had 1 outlier, it was not extreme, and we decided to keep it for analysis due to its being a possible increase in score between gameplay sessions. The dependent t test could thus be used to analyze the differences between standing and seated gameplay.

 Ethical Considerations

According to the Swedish Ethical Review Act [95], this study did not require ethical review, as it posed no apparent risk of physical or psychological harm to the research subjects, did not involve a physical intervention, and did not involve sensitive personal data. Nonetheless, all procedures adhered to ethical standards outlined in Swedish law (SFS 2003:460). Participants were verbally invited to join the study and were provided with an overview of the project and study procedures. Upon agreeing to participate, individuals received a written information letter and were asked to sign the written consent form. Participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without providing a reason. To ensure anonymity, each participant was assigned a unique code that could not be traced back to them. Only the project team had access to these coded data.

 Results Study 1: Upper Body Versus Full Body Movement Interactions

Overall, the participants perceived the exergame as controllable and immersive, with perceived exertion corresponding to a low-intensity activity for both the upper body and full body movement interactions (Table 3). In the upper body condition, participants on average agreed that the casual exergame was controllable (median 4.00, IQR 0.88) and were between being neutral and somewhat agreeing that the casual exergame was immersive (median 3.40, IQR 0.90), with a perceived exertion corresponding to a low-intensity activity (median 11.00, IQR 2.00). In the full body condition, participants perceived the exergame as less controllable (median 3.50, IQR 1.00) than, and as immersive (median 3.40, IQR 1.00) as, the upper body condition, with a perceived exertion corresponding to a moderate-intensity activity (median 13.00, IQR 3.50). The statistical analysis (Table 4) showed that the exergame was perceived as significantly more controllable in the upper body condition than in the full body condition (U=589.00; P=.04), corresponding to a small effect size (0.23). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the conditions regarding perceived immersion (U=754.00; P=.66) and perceived exertion (U=652.00; P=.15).

Descriptive statistics for upper body and full body movement interactions.

Measure Upper body Full body
Mean (SD) Median (IQR) Mean (SD) Median (IQR)
Sideways movements, n 12.88 (6.57) 11.50 (7.50) 9.58 (4.86) 9.00 (8.00)
Forward movements, n 62.30 (13.54) 62.50 (16.00) 56.98 (11.38) 57.50 (16.50)
Performance 58.53 (12.93) 58.50 (16.00) 47.60 (13.98) 46.50 (22.50)
Perceived control 3.78 (0.61) 4.00 (0.88) 3.48 (0.69) 3.50 (1.00)
Perceived immersion 3.24 (0.62) 3.40 (0.90) 3.15 (0.65) 3.40 (1.00)
Perceived exertion 11.47 (2.10) 11.00 (2.00) 12.00 (2.60) 13.00 (3.50)

Differences between upper body and full body movement interactions.

Variable ∆median (UBa–FBb) Mann-Whitney U test z score P value Effect size (r)
Perceived controlc 0.5 589.00 –2.05 .04c 0.23
Perceived immersion 0.0 754.00 –0.45 .66 0.05
Perceived exertion −2.0 652.00 –1.45 .15 0.16

aUB: upper body game controller.

bFB: full body game controller.

cSignificant effect at P<.05.

The Spearman correlation matrix (Table 5) showed a significant moderate correlation between perceived immersion and perceived control (0.44; P<.001). No significant correlation was found between perceived exertion and perceived control (0.07; P=.51) and between perceived exertion and perceived immersion (0.11; P=.33).

Spearman correlation matrix of perceived control, immersion, and exertion.

Variable Perceived control Perceived immersion Perceived exertion
Perceived control
r —a 0.44 0.07
P value — <.001b .51
Perceived immersion
r 0.44 — 0.11
P value <.001b — .33
Perceived exertion
r 0.07 0.11 —
P value .51 .33 —

aNot applicable.

aP value met the threshold for significance.

 Study 2: Standing Versus Seated Positions for Upper Body Movement Interactions

There was an increase in positive affect scores from before (mean 13.90, SD 3.43; median 14.00, IQR 4.50) to after (mean 16.00, SD 4.61; median 15.00, IQR 7.00) playing one 2-minute session of the exergame in the seated position. The Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that this difference was significant (z=–3.288; P=.001), and the effect size (r=0.74) corresponded to a large effect [85]. There was also an increase in positive affect scores from before (mean 13.45, SD 3.69; median 13.50, IQR 5.00) to after (mean 16.00, SD 4.19; median 16.00, IQR 7.00) playing one 2-minute session of the exergame in the standing position. The Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that this was also significant (z=–2.947; P=.003), and the effect size (r=0.66) corresponded to a large effect [85].

The highest percentage of their maximum heart rate that participants reached during standing gameplay (mean 63.29%, SD 7.40%) was slightly higher than that reached during seated gameplay (mean 60.46%, SD 7.38%), which was significant (t39=2.805; P=.008), with an effect size (Cohen d=0.44) corresponding to a small effect. Similarly, the average heart rate (as a percentage of the estimated maximum heart rate) was also slightly higher in standing gameplay (mean 55.71%, SD 7.78%) than in seated gameplay (mean 52.63%, SD 6.92%). This was again statistically significant (t39=2.542; P=.02), with an effect size (Cohen d=0.40) corresponding to a small effect.

Standing gameplay also showed slightly higher scores in positive affect, enjoyment, and perceived exertion than seated gameplay, while seated gameplay had slightly higher scores in performance than standing gameplay. However, none of these differences were significant (Table 6).

Statistical analysis of seated gameplay compared to standing gameplay.

Measure Seated gameplay, mean (SD) Standing gameplay, mean (SD) Seated gameplay, median (IQR) Standing gameplay, median (IQR) t test (df) P value Effect size (Cohen d)
Positive affect 15.80 (4.85) 16.13 (4.82) 15.00 (8.50) 15.50 (7.00) 1.114 (39) .27 0.18
Enjoyment 25.38 (5.67) 25.90 (5.66) 25.00 (9.50) 25.50 (8.50) 0.894 (39) .38 0.14
Perceived exertion 10.60 (2.04) 10.95 (2.40) 11.00 (3.00) 11.00 (3.00) 1.300 (39) .20 0.21
Average heart rate (%) 52.63 (6.92) 55.71 (7.78) 51.93 (1.74) 55.21 (0.97) 2.542 (39) .02a 0.40
Highest heart rate (%) 60.46 (7.38) 63.29 (7.40) 60.21 (8.44) 62.24 (8.93) 2.805 (39) .008a 0.44
Performance 702.30 (109.52) 695.50 (94.13) 716.50 (154.50) 706.00 (116) –0.409 (39) .69 0.07

aP value met the threshold for significance.

 Discussion

This work aimed to study the psychological effects and physical exertion of playing short-duration casual exergames lasting 2 minutes based on upper body movement interactions designed to promote active microbreaks for people who are sedentary. In the first study, upper body movement interactions were compared to full body movement interactions, and in the second study, seated gameplay was compared to standing gameplay when using upper body movement interactions.

Principal Findings

This work demonstrated that (1) upper body movement interactions in casual exergames can be as effective and appealing as full body movement interactions; and (2) playing upper body casual exergames in standing positions can result in slightly higher effectiveness than, and a similar degree of attractiveness as, playing upper body casual exergames in seated positions.

In terms of the psychological effects of casual exergames, study 1 showed that the upper body casual exergame controller was perceived as more controllable than the full body controller and that the level of immersion was similar for both conditions. As perceived control is seen as a prerequisite to an immersive experience [50] and was found to positively correlate to immersion in this study, longer-duration gameplay could have resulted in the upper body condition being perceived as more immersive over time; for example, 1 study found that short-duration gameplay lasting 3 minutes resulted in less immersion than long-duration gameplay lasting 7 minutes [96]. The short-duration gameplay session lasting 2 minutes in this study could thus have resulted in lower immersion than if the exergame had been played for longer durations. Further research would be needed to investigate whether this holds true. In study 2, the psychological effects were similar for the seated and standing upper body movement conditions, with no significant difference in positive affect, enjoyment, or performance. Furthermore, the results showed that both seated and standing upper body casual exergame movement interactions significantly increased positive affect after participants played a 2-minute session. The result signifies that seated and standing casual exergame play could both be valid movement interaction options for upper body casual exergames.

In terms of physiological effectiveness, study 1 showed that perceived exertion did not differ for the upper body and full body casual exergame conditions. Similarly, in study 2, there was no significant difference between perceived exertion for the standing and seated upper body casual exergame conditions. However, there was a difference in terms of the objective measure of exertion. The standing group had a significantly higher heart rate than the sitting group for both the highest and average heart rates, although the effect size was small for both. As no objective measure of exertion was taken in study 1, a similar pattern could have emerged for the upper body conditions compared to the full body conditions. The upper body movement interactions provided a light level of perceived exertion in both study 1 (mean 11.47, SD 2.10), with the upper body movement corresponding to players lifting their arms, and study 2 (mean 10.60, SD 2.04 for seated gameplay and mean 10.95, SD 2.40 for standing gameplay), with the upper body movement corresponding to boxing-like movements. However, while the highest heart rates reached also showed a light level of exertion (mean 60.46%, SD 7.38% for seated gameplay and mean 63.29%, SD 7.40% for standing gameplay), the average heart rates in study 2 (mean 52.63%, SD 6.92% for seated gameplay and mean 55.71%, SD 7.78% for standing gameplay) only indicate a very light–intensity activity, which might also be the case for study 1. On the basis of previous research claiming that casual exergames should produce at least a moderate level of exertion [33], neither exergame thus reached sufficient levels of exertion. Despite this, both exergames may be considered appropriate tools for microbreaks during the day, considering that every move contributes to better health [69], and microbreaks (2-3 min of light-intensity exercise) during the day (every 30 min) still offer both physical and mental health benefits [20-22]. The higher heart rate averages displayed in study 2 imply that people could gain some benefit from playing upper body casual exergames in standing positions compared to seated positions. However, due to the small difference in effect size and with both measures corresponding to very light activity, playing seated should be seen as a reasonable option for those who prefer to do so. Further research is necessary to ascertain the long-term effects on physical health of playing in seated or standing positions.

 Comparison With Prior Work

The importance of considering both the psychological effects and the physical exertion of playing exergames has been highlighted previously [46-48, 73]. This study focused on how the movement interactions used in casual exergames could affect these dimensions.

Previous research has shown that playing exergames in both standing and seated positions produces equivalent levels of enjoyment (psychological attractiveness) [41,64,65,71,72]. The results from this work further support these findings, showing no difference between the seated and standing positions in terms of enjoyment; in addition, they support the notion that the psychological effects are also similar in terms of positive affect and performance [41]. Previous research has also shown that playing casual exergames can induce positive affective states [31,32,41]. The results of this study support this notion, with both the seated and standing positions generating an increase in positive affect. As positive affect can reduce stress levels [42], enhance overall well-being [43], and improve work performance [97], casual exergames could be promising for implementation in a workplace context to promote active microbreaks.

Regarding physiological effectiveness, previous studies have found mixed results when comparing standing and seated exergaming. While some studies have found higher energy expenditure in seated gameplay [64,65], others have found higher energy expenditure in standing gameplay [68,72]. Our results in study 2 support that standing gameplay involves higher objective exertion than seated gameplay, with no difference in subjective measures. The higher exertion in the standing position is likely due to using the leg muscles to stand (although they are not used to play the exergame) because even sedentary activities require more energy when standing instead of sitting [66,67]. When rating perceived exertion, this difference might be small enough that people do not register it because the exertion in their arms is more noticeable after playing, thus leading to similarly rated exertion despite differing heart rates. The results show that the difference in heart rate percentage is only approximately 3% for both the highest and average heart rates, which may feel very similar. As for why the participants rated their exertion higher than their heart rates show, it is possible that the average over the 2 minutes of gameplay does not reflect the exertion level at the end, which is when the participants rated their exertion. When beginning an activity, the heart rate rises gradually. With the short playtimes, this initial increase might affect the average heart rate more than it would in a longer activity. The highest heart rate reached was typically toward the end of the sessions and was also more closely matched to the perceived exertion.

Previous studies have also shown mixed results when comparing upper body to lower body movement interactions. It has been suggested by some studies that upper body exergaming might not be sufficient for achieving adequate energy expenditure [46,59]. Meanwhile, other studies have suggested that certain upper body movements could produce sufficient exertion levels [39,60-63]. This study found no difference in perceived exertion between upper body and full body movement interactions, somewhat supporting the notion that upper body movements could produce sufficient exertion. However, because no objective measures of exertion were recorded in study 1, more research would be needed to validate that this holds true not only for subjective measures of exertion but also for objective measures.

A meta-review shows that upper body movement interactions characterized by continuous movements can result in greater energy expenditures and intensity levels [39]. Previous studies on boxing exergames have shown that boxing-like movements can achieve a moderate intensity of exertion [39,60-63]. However, both the perceived exertion and the heart rate data showed that the exergame in study 2, which involved using boxing-like movements, only reached a light or very light intensity of exertion. A potential explanation for this difference could be the time participants spent playing because a 2-minute exergame session will feel less exerting than the same exergame played for twice as long or more. Another explanation could be that the design of the exergame influenced the amount of physical effort the participants were willing to exert; for example, the exergame in study 2 features short pauses between sets of targets, which could have contributed to participants not reaching moderate levels of exertion. The interplay between gameplay duration, movement design, and exergame design is an interesting avenue for further research.

 Limitations

Integrating active microbreaks into the day via casual exergames has shown promising advantages [32,37]. However, both studies took place at a game and cosplay festival at a specific point in time. The 2-minute casual exergames may influence positive affect in distinct ways when experienced in other settings; for example, having an audience of peers sharing an interest in gaming might be experienced as more positive than playing alone. Furthermore, because the number of people observing the players varied throughout the day depending on other activities at the festival, participants may also have had different experiences depending on their reactions to feeling observed. Conducting the studies in a more controlled setting might produce different results. In addition, continuous gameplay might play a role in influencing changes in positive affect over time. Further research should also be undertaken to quantify the findings of these studies by using other casual exergames.

Participants in both studies played the exergames for the first time. Thus, the lack of familiarity may have influenced their impression of the movement interactions in both study 1 (upper body movement interactions compared to full body movement interactions) and study 2 (upper body movement interactions in seated compared to standing positions). Further research should incorporate a phase allowing participants to familiarize themselves with the exergame controllers before the start of the study. This would help determine whether the findings remain applicable when participants have fully mastered the exergame controls. As this study only covered players’ initial experience with casual exergames, there is a need for longitudinal studies on the psychological attractiveness and physiological effectiveness of different movement interactions in casual exergames and how they should be constructed to increase the psychological attractiveness and physical effectiveness over time.

The results regarding exertion in study 1 are also limited due to a lack of objective measures of exertion. As seen in study 2, there could be differences in the full body and upper body movement interactions in terms of exertion that are not captured through only perceived exertion. Further research using objective measures (eg, heart rate) should be undertaken to better understand the effectiveness of full body and upper body movement interactions in short casual exergames. Furthermore, both studies could greatly benefit from using more extensive measures of physical activity, such as metabolic equivalents of tasks (METs) and maximal oxygen consumption, to examine the extent of any health benefits of playing short-duration casual exergames in different player modes.

 Conclusions

Short-duration casual exergames lasting 2 minutes with upper body movements may hold potential in promoting active microbreaks during sedentary periods. As this study showed, upper body casual exergame play can produce light exertion levels and an increase in positive affect after compared to before playing. Upper body movement interactions may also be more suitable for casual exergames used for microbreaks because they are perceived as easier to control than full body movement interactions, while reaching similar (light) exertion levels and immersion. Playing with upper body movement interactions in standing gameplay could involve slightly higher objective exertion (as measured by the heart rate) than when playing the same exergame in a seated position; however, due to the small difference, seated positions should not be neglected as a viable alternative for players who prefer them. Furthermore, upper body movement interactions in both seated and standing positions elicit comparable psychological effects, resulting in similar levels of enjoyment, positive affect, and performance.

 Abbreviations EEQ

Exergame Enjoyment Questionnaire

 MET

metabolic equivalent of task

 PACES

Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale

 PANAS

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule

 RPE

rating of perceived exertion

 RQ

research question

The authors would like to thank the users for participating in the study and East Sweden Game for supporting and enabling the data collection. The authors would also like to thank Erik Berglund who developed the exergames used in this research and Izabella Jedel for assisting in the data collection and analysis.

AB and HO contributed to the conception and design of the study. AB contributed to the design of the exergames used in the study. AB and a research assistant, Izabella Jedel, collected the data for study 1. AB and HO collected the data for study 2. HO and a research assistant, Izabella Jedel, performed the statistical analysis. AB wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Both AB and HO then carefully reviewed and edited the manuscript.

AB is a cofounder and the chief executive officer of Liopep, a spin-off company based on her research projects about exergames that aim to increase physical activity. Liopep is commercializing an app that includes the 2 exergames evaluated in this research. While the authors have taken steps to ensure objectivity, readers should be aware of this affiliation. No revenue was paid (or promised to be paid) to any of the authors or the university for the submission of this work. Transparency and research integrity have been maintained through collaborative efforts and rigorous peer review. AB was excluded from the data analysis phase of both studies to ensure that the conflict of interest did not bias the research process and outcomes. In addition, AB did not collect the data alone; data collection was conducted collaboratively by the entire author team. The study design was also a joint effort by the author team, further ensuring the integrity and impartiality of the research findings. HO declares no conflicts of interest.

 Tremblay MS Aubert S Barnes JD Saunders TJ Carson V Latimer-Cheung AE Chastin SF Altenburg TM Chinapaw MJ SBRN Terminology Consensus Project Participants Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN) - terminology consensus project process and outcome Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017 06 10 14 1 75 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 28599680 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8 PMC5466781 Sedentary Behaviour Research Network Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms "sedentary" and "sedentary behaviours" Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2012 06 37 3 540 2 10.1139/h2012-024 22540258 Ekelund U Tarp J Steene-Johannessen J Hansen BH Jefferis B Fagerland MW Whincup P Diaz KM Hooker SP Chernofsky A Larson MG Spartano N Vasan RS Dohrn I Hagströmer M Edwardson C Yates T Shiroma E Anderssen SA Lee I Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis BMJ 2019 08 21 366 l4570 10.1136/bmj.l4570 31434697 PMC6699591 Stamatakis E Gale J Bauman A Ekelund U Hamer M Ding D Sitting time, physical activity, and risk of mortality in adults J Am Coll Cardiol 2019 04 30 73 16 2062 72 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.031 31023430 S0735-1097(19)33789-1 Owen N Healy GN Matthews CE Dunstan DW Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2010 07 38 3 105 13 10.1097/JES.0b013e3181e373a2 20577058 00003677-201007000-00003 PMC3404815 Bauman AE Petersen CB Blond K Rangul V Hardy LL Leitzmann MF Jochem C Schmid D The descriptive epidemiology of sedentary behaviour Sedentary Behaviour Epidemiology 2018 Cham, Switzerland Springer 73 106 Egan CA Webster CA Beets MW Weaver RG Russ L Michael D Nesbitt D Orendorff KL Sedentary time and behavior during school: a systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Health Educ 2019 09 03 50 5 283 90 10.1080/19325037.2019.1642814 Kuzik N da Costa BG Hwang Y Verswijveren SJ Rollo S Tremblay MS Bélanger S Carson V Davis M Hornby S Huang WY Law B Salmon J Tomasone JR Wachira L Wijndaele K Saunders TJ School-related sedentary behaviours and indicators of health and well-being among children and youth: a systematic review Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2022 04 05 19 1 40 10.1186/s12966-022-01258-4 35382825 10.1186/s12966-022-01258-4 PMC8979786 Castro O Bennie J Vergeer I Bosselut G Biddle SJ How sedentary are university students? A systematic review and meta-analysis Prev Sci 2020 04 23 21 3 332 43 10.1007/s11121-020-01093-8 31975312 10.1007/s11121-020-01093-8 Prince SA Elliott CG Scott K Visintini S Reed JL Device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health and fitness across occupational groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2019 04 02 16 1 30 10.1186/s12966-019-0790-9 30940176 10.1186/s12966-019-0790-9 PMC6444868 Parry S Straker L The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk BMC Public Health 2013 04 04 13 1 296 10.1186/1471-2458-13-296 23557495 1471-2458-13-296 PMC3651291 Pettee Gabriel KK Morrow JR Woolsey AL Framework for physical activity as a complex and multidimensional behavior J Phys Act Health 2012 01 9 Suppl 1 s1 S11 8 10.1123/jpah.9.s1.s11 22287443 Healy GN Matthews CE Dunstan DW Winkler EA Owen N Sedentary time and cardio-metabolic biomarkers in US adults: NHANES 2003-06 Eur Heart J 2011 03 32 5 590 7 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq451 21224291 ehq451 PMC3634159 Healy GN Dunstan DW Salmon J Cerin E Shaw JE Zimmet PZ Owen N Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk Diabetes Care 2008 04 31 4 661 6 10.2337/dc07-2046 18252901 dc07-2046 Park JH Moon JH Kim HJ Kong MH Oh YH Sedentary lifestyle: overview of updated evidence of potential health risks Korean J Fam Med 2020 11 41 6 365 73 10.4082/kjfm.20.0165 33242381 kjfm.20.0165 PMC7700832 Koster A Caserotti P Patel KV Matthews CE Berrigan D Van Domelen DR Brychta RJ Chen KY Harris TB Association of sedentary time with mortality independent of moderate to vigorous physical activity PLoS One 2012 6 13 7 6 e37696 10.1371/journal.pone.0037696 22719846 PONE-D-11-12369 PMC3374810 Chau JY Grunseit AC Chey T Stamatakis E Brown WJ Matthews CE Bauman AE van der Ploeg HP Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis PLoS One 2013 11 13 8 11 e80000 10.1371/journal.pone.0080000 24236168 PONE-D-13-19234 PMC3827429 Saunders TJ McIsaac T Douillette K Gaulton N Hunter S Rhodes RE Prince SA Carson V Chaput J Chastin S Giangregorio L Janssen I Katzmarzyk PT Kho ME Poitras VJ Powell KE Ross R Ross-White A Tremblay MS Healy GN Sedentary behaviour and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2020 10 45 10 (Suppl. 2) S197 217 10.1139/apnm-2020-0272 33054341 Giurgiu M Koch ED Plotnikoff RC Ebner-Priemer UW Reichert M Breaking up sedentary behavior optimally to enhance mood Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020 02 52 2 457 65 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002132 31453884 00005768-202002000-00022 Radwan A Barnes L DeResh R Englund C Gribanoff S Effects of active microbreaks on the physical and mental well-being of office workers: a systematic review Cogent Eng 2022 01 19 9 1 1 12 10.1080/23311916.2022.2026206 Dunstan DW Kingwell BA Larsen R Healy GN Cerin E Hamilton MT Shaw JE Bertovic DA Zimmet PZ Salmon J Owen N Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses Diabetes Care 2012 05 35 5 976 83 10.2337/dc11-1931 22374636 dc11-1931 PMC3329818 Peddie MC Bone JL Rehrer NJ Skeaff CM Gray AR Perry TL Breaking prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glycemia in healthy, normal-weight adults: a randomized crossover trial Am J Clin Nutr 2013 08 98 2 358 66 10.3945/ajcn.112.051763 23803893 S0002-9165(23)05182-1 Mailey EL Rosenkranz SK Casey K Swank A Comparing the effects of two different break strategies on occupational sedentary behavior in a real world setting: a randomized trial Prev Med Rep 2016 12 4 423 8 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.08.010 27583200 S2211-3355(16)30095-X PMC4995540 Bianchi-Berthouze N Kim WW Patel D Does body movement engage you more in digital game play? And why? Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction 2007 ACII '07 September 12-14, 2007 Lisbon, Portugal 12 4 10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_10 Sween J Wallington SF Sheppard V Taylor T Llanos AA Adams-Campbell LL The role of exergaming in improving physical activity: a review J Phys Act Health 2014 05 11 4 864 70 10.1123/jpah.2011-0425 25078529 PMC4180490 Wüest S van de Langenberg R de Bruin ED Design considerations for a theory-driven exergame-based rehabilitation program to improve walking of persons with stroke Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 2014 12 7 11 2 119 29 10.1007/s11556-013-0136-6 25309631 136 PMC4180860 Huang K Zhao Y He R Zhong T Yang H Chen Y Liu Z Ma L Jia Y Chen L Exergame-based exercise training for depressive symptoms in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Psychol Sport Exerc 2022 11 63 102266 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102266 Oh Y Yang S Defining exergames and exergaming Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Meaningful Play 2010 MP '10 October 21-23, 2010 East Lansing, MI 21 23 Klompstra L Jaarsma T Piepoli MF Ben Gal T Evangelista L Strömberg A Bäck M Objectively measured physical activity in patients with heart failure: a sub-analysis from the HF-Wii study Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2022 06 30 21 5 499 508 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab133 34993536 6498070 Oyebode O Orji R A persuasive mobile game for reducing sedentary behaviour and promoting physical activity Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Persuasive Technology 2020 ICPT '20 April 20-23, 2020 Aalborg, Denmark 1 4 Gao Y Gerling KM Mandryk R Stanley KG Decreasing sedentary behaviours in pre-adolescents using casual exergames at school Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play 2014 CHI PLAY '14 October 19-21, 2014 Toronto, ON 97 106 10.1145/2658537.2658693 Gao Y Mandryk R The acute cognitive benefits of casual exergame play Proceedings of the 2012 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2012 CHI '12 May 5-10, 2012 Austin, TX 1863 72 10.1145/2207676.2208323 Gao Y Mandryk RL GrabApple: the design of a casual exergame Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Entertainment Computing 2011 ICEC '11 October 5-8, 2011 Vancouver, BC 35 46 10.1007/978-3-642-24500-8_5 Ren X Hollander L Van Marel R Molenaar L Lu Y Step-by-step: exploring a social exergame to encourage physical activity and social dynamics among office workers Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2019 CHI EA '19 May 4-9, 2019 Glasgow, UK 1 6 10.1145/3290607.3312788 Yoo S Gough P Kay J Embedding a VR game studio in a sedentary workplace: use, experience and exercise benefits Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2020 CHI '20 April 25-30, 2020 Honolulu, HI 1 14 10.1145/3313831.3376371 Cambo SA Avrahami D Lee ML BreakSense: combining physiological and location sensing to promote mobility during work-breaks Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2017 CHI '17 May 6-11, 2017 Denver, CO 3595 607 10.1145/3025453.3026021 Berglund A Jedel I Orädd H Fallström J Berglund E Liopep: a gamified casual exergame application to help office workers not be active couch potatoes Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 11th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health 2023 SeGAH '23 April 21-26, 2023 Athens, Greece 1 8 10.1109/segah57547.2023.10253779 Wu PT Wu WL Chu IH Energy expenditure and intensity in healthy young adults during exergaming Am J Hlth Behav 2015 07 01 39 4 556 61 10.5993/ajhb.39.4.12 Davis JC Killen LG Green JM Waldman HS Renfroe LG Exergaming for physical activity: a systematic review J Am Coll Health 2022 07 26 1 9 10.1080/07448481.2022.2103377 35882066 Berglund E Jedel I Berglund A Using mediapipe machine learning to design casual exertion games to interrupt prolonged sedentary lifestyle Proceedings of the 5th International Conference, HCI-Games 2023, Held as Part of the 25th HCI International Conference on HCI in Games 2023 HCII '23 July 23-28, 2023 Copenhagen, Denmark 237 51 10.1007/978-3-031-35930-9_16 Berglund E Orädd H Jedel I Berglund A The potential of seated and standing short duration casual exergames to increase positive affect Proceedings of the 26th International Academic Mindtrek Conference 2023 Mindtrek '23 October 3-6, 2023 Tampere, Finland 25 34 10.1145/3616961.3616964 Gloria CT Faulk KE Steinhardt MA Positive affectivity predicts successful and unsuccessful adaptation to stress Motiv Emot 2012 4 6 37 1 185 93 10.1007/s11031-012-9291-8 Meyers MC van Woerkom M Effects of a strengths intervention on general and work-related well-being: the mediating role of positive affect J Happiness Stud 2016 4 30 18 3 671 89 10.1007/s10902-016-9745-x Lee S Kim W Park T Peng W The psychological effects of playing exergames: a systematic review Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2017 09 20 9 513 32 10.1089/cyber.2017.0183 28837353 10.1089/cyber.2017.0183 Berglund A Jedel I Orädd H Berglund E The attractiveness and effectiveness of upper body and full body casual exergame controllers Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 11th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health 2023 SeGAH '23 August 28-30, 2023 Athens, Greece 28 30 10.1109/segah57547.2023.10253764 Peng W Lin JH Crouse J Is playing exergames really exercising? A meta-analysis of energy expenditure in active video games Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2011 11 14 11 681 8 10.1089/cyber.2010.0578 21668370 Subramanian S Skjæret-Maroni N Dahl Y Systematic review of design guidelines for full-body interactive games Interact Compute 2020 32 4 367 406 10.1093/iwc/iwaa026 Sinclair J Hingston P Masek M Considerations for the design of exergames Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Australia and Southeast Asia 2007 GRAPHITE '07 December 1-4, 2007 Perth, Australia 289 95 10.1145/1321261.1321313 Sinclair J Hingston P Masek M Exergame development using the dual flow model Proceedings of the 6th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment 2009 IE '09 December 17-19, 2009 Sydney, Australia 1 7 10.1145/1746050.1746061 Brown E Cairns P A grounded investigation of game immersion Proceedings of the 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2004 CHI EA '04 April 24-29, 2004 Vienna, Austria 1297 300 10.1145/985921.986048 Jennett C Cox AL Cairns P Dhoparee S Epps A Tijs T Walton A Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games Int J Hum Comput Interact 2008 9 66 9 641 61 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004 Csikszentmihalyi M Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience 1990 New York, NY Harper Perennial Modern Classics Pasch M Bianchi-Berthouze N van Dijk B Nijholt A Movement-based sports video games: investigating motivation and gaming experience Entertain Comput 2009 4 1 2 49 61 10.1016/j.entcom.2009.09.004 Trepte S Reinecke L The pleasures of success: game-related efficacy experiences as a mediator between player performance and game enjoyment Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2011 09 14 9 555 7 10.1089/cyber.2010.0358 21342012 Klimmt C Blake C Hefner D Vorderer P Roth C Player performance, satisfaction, and video game enjoyment Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Entertainment Computing 2009 ICEC '09 September 3-5, 2009 Paris, France 3 5 10.1007/978-3-642-04052-8_1 Lemmens JS von Münchhausen CF Let the beat flow: How game difficulty in virtual reality affects flow Acta Psychol (Amst) 2023 02 232 103812 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103812 36566612 S0001-6918(22)00327-4 Skjæret-Maroni N Vonstad EK Ihlen EA Tan X Helbostad JL Vereijken B Exergaming in older adults: movement characteristics while playing stepping games Front Psychol 2016 06 24 7 964 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00964 27445926 PMC4919354 Isbister K Mueller FF Guidelines for the design of movement-based games and their relevance to HCI Hum Comput Interact 2014 12 22 30 3-4 366 99 10.1080/07370024.2014.996647 Graves LE Ridgers ND Stratton G The contribution of upper limb and total body movement to adolescents' energy expenditure whilst playing Nintendo Wii Eur J Appl Physiol 2008 11 8 104 4 617 23 10.1007/s00421-008-0813-8 18607619 Barkley JE Penko AL Physiologic responses, perceived exertion, and hedonics of playing a physical interactive video game relative to a sedentary alternative and treadmill walking in adults J Exerc Physiol Online 2009 12 3 12 23 Miyachi M Yamamoto K Ohkawara K Tanaka S METs in adults while playing active video games: a metabolic chamber study Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010 06 42 6 1149 53 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c51c78 19997034 O'Donovan C Hussey J Active video games as a form of exercise and the effect of gaming experience: a preliminary study in healthy young adults Physiotherapy 2012 09 98 3 205 10 10.1016/j.physio.2012.05.001 22898576 S0031-9406(12)00046-6 Perusek K Sparks K Little K Motley M Patterson S Wieand J A comparison of energy expenditure during "wii boxing" versus heavy bag boxing in young adults Games Health J 2014 02 3 1 21 4 10.1089/g4h.2013.0059 26197251 Malone LA Mendonca CJ Mohanraj S Misko SR Moore J Brascome JM Thirumalai M Usability of the GAIMplank video game controller for people with mobility impairments: observational study JMIR Serious Games 2023 01 10 11 e38484 10.2196/38484 36626195 v11i1e38484 PMC9947916 Malone LA Davlyatov GK Padalabalanarayanan S Thirumalai M Active video gaming using an adapted gaming mat in youth and adults with physical disabilities: observational study JMIR Serious Games 2021 08 26 9 3 e30672 10.2196/30672 34435962 v9i3e30672 PMC8430845 Roemmich JN Height-adjustable desks: energy expenditure, liking, and preference of sitting and standing J Phys Act Health 2016 10 13 10 1094 9 10.1123/jpah.2015-0397 27256708 2015-0397 Gibbs BB Kowalsky RJ Perdomo SJ Grier M Jakicic JM Energy expenditure of deskwork when sitting, standing or alternating positions Occup Med (Lond) 2017 03 01 67 2 121 7 10.1093/occmed/kqw115 27515973 kqw115 Kafri M Myslinski MJ Gade VK Deutsch JE Energy expenditure and exercise intensity of interactive video gaming in individuals poststroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014 01 29 28 1 56 65 10.1177/1545968313497100 23897906 1545968313497100 Every move counts towards better health – says WHO World Health Organization 2020 2024-04-29 https://www.who.int/news/item/25-11-2020-every-move-counts-towards-better-health-says-who#:~:text=%E2%80%9CPhysical%20activity%20of%20any%20type,more%20physical%20activity%20to%20counter Graves LE Ridgers ND Williams K Stratton G Atkinson G Cable NT The physiological cost and enjoyment of Wii Fit in adolescents, young adults, and older adults J Phys Act Health 2010 05 7 3 393 401 10.1123/jpah.7.3.393 20551497 Xu W Liang H He Q Li X Yu K Chen Y Results and guidelines from a repeated-measures design experiment comparing standing and seated full-body gesture-based immersive virtual reality exergames: within-subjects evaluation JMIR Serious Games 2020 07 27 8 3 e17972 10.2196/17972 32716004 v8i3e17972 PMC7418021 Malone LA Thirumalai M Padalabalanarayanan S Neal WN Bowman S Mehta T Energy expenditure and enjoyment during active video gaming using an adapted Wii Fit balance board in adults with physical disabilities: observational study JMIR Serious Games 2019 02 01 7 1 e11326 10.2196/11326 30707098 v7i1e11326 PMC6376329 Berglund E Jedel I Orädd H Berglund A Considerations for player enjoyment and exertion in casual exergames Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2024 HICSS '24 January 3-6, 2024 Hilton Hawaiian Village, HI 1328 37 2008‐2009 casual games white paper International Game Developers Association 2008 2024-04-29 https://www.org.id.tue.nl/IFIP-TC14/documents/IGDACasualGames-WhitePaper-2008.pdf Borg GA Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982 14 5 377 81 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012 Chen MJ Fan X Moe ST Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis J Sports Sci 2002 11 09 20 11 873 99 10.1080/026404102320761787 12430990 Williams N The Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale Occup Med 2017 67 5 404 5 10.1093/occmed/kqx063 Borg G Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales 1998 Champaign, IL Human Kinetics Publishers Yoo S Ackad C Heywood T Kay J Evaluating the actual and perceived exertion provided by virtual reality games Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing 2017 CHI EA '17 May 6-11, 2017 Denver, CO 3050 7 10.1145/3027063.3053203 Stewart TH Villaneuva K Hahn A Ortiz-Delatorre J Wolf C Nguyen R Bolter ND Kern M Bagley JR Actual vs. perceived exertion during active virtual reality game exercise Front Rehabil Sci 2022 8 8 3 887740 10.3389/fresc.2022.887740 36189005 PMC9397749 Fitzgerald A Huang S Sposato K Wang D Claypool M Agu E The exergame enjoyment questionnaire (eeq): an instrument for measuring exergame enjoyment Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2020 HICSS '20 January 7-10, 2020 Maui, HI 3397 406 10.24251/hicss.2020.416 Bland JM Altman DG Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha BMJ 1997 02 22 314 7080 572 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572 9055718 PMC2126061 Field A Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th edition 2013 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications McKnight PE Najab J Weiner IB Craighead WE Mann-whitney U test The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology 2010 Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons Sawilowsky SS New effect size rules of thumb J Mod App Stat Meth 2009 11 01 8 2 597 9 10.22237/jmasm/1257035100 Taylor R Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review J Diagn Med Sonogr 2016 07 01 6 1 35 9 10.1177/875647939000600106 Thompson ER Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) J Cross Cult Psychol 2016 07 26 38 2 227 42 10.1177/0022022106297301 Watson D Clark LA Tellegen A Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales J Pers Soc Psychol 1988 06 54 6 1063 70 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063 3397865 Kendzierski D DeCarlo KJ Physical activity enjoyment scale: two validation studies J Sport Exerc Psychol 1991 13 1 50 64 10.1123/jsep.13.1.50 Whitehead A Johnston H Nixon N Welch J Exergame effectiveness: what the numbers can tell us Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games 2010 Sandbox '10 July 28-29, 2010 Los Angeles, CA 55 62 10.1145/1836135.1836144 Pollock BS Barkley JE Potenzini N Desalvo RM Buser SL Otterstetter R Juvancic-Heltzel JA Validity of borg ratings of perceived exertion during active video game play Int J Exerc Sci 2013 6 2 164 70 27293499 PMC4882467 Crawford JR Henry JD The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample Br J Clin Psychol 2004 09 24 43 Pt 3 245 65 10.1348/0144665031752934 15333231 van Geest J Samaritter R van Hooren S Move and be moved: the effect of moving specific movement elements on the experience of happiness Front Psychol 2020 1 15 11 579518 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579518 33584414 PMC7874178 Kirk A MacMillan F Rice M Carmichael A An exploratory study examining the appropriateness and potential benefit of the nintendo wii as a physical activity tool in adults aged ≥ 55 years Interact Comput 2013 25 1 102 14 10.1093/iwc/iws004 Ethical review of research involving humans Swedish Ethical Review Authority https://etikprovningsmyndigheten.se/for-forskare/utbildningsmaterial/ Zhang C Hoel AS Perkis A Zadtootaghaj S How long is long enough to induce immersion? Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience 2018 QoMEX '18 May 29-31, 2018 Cagliari, Italy 1 6 10.1109/qomex.2018.8463397 Kim S Park Y Headrick L Daily micro-breaks and job performance: general work engagement as a cross-level moderator J Appl Psychol 2018 07 103 7 772 86 10.1037/apl0000308 29595289 2018-12793-001