Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Monday, March 11, 2019 at 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?


Currently submitted to: JMIR Serious Games

Date Submitted: Jul 5, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jul 9, 2019 - Sep 3, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note “no longer under consideration” will appear above).

Peer-review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a “Peer-Review Me” button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed “version of record” (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Learning to read by Learning to Write – An Evaluation of a Serious Game to Foster Business Process Model Comprehension

  • Michael Winter; 
  • Rüdiger Pryss; 
  • Thomas Probst; 
  • Manfred Reichert; 



The management and required comprehension of business process models is of utmost importance for almost any enterprise. To foster the comprehension of such models, this paper incorporates the idea of a serious game called “Tales of Knightly Process”.


In order to investigate whether the serious game has a positive immediate and follow-up impact on process model comprehension, two studies with n = 81 and n = 64 and participants each were conducted.


Within two studies (four weeks between Study I and Study II), participants were divided into a game and control group (i.e., Study I), as well as follow-up game and follow-up control group. In both studies, participants had to answer 10 comprehension questions on 5 different process models. Note that, in Study I, players of the game group played the serious game before they answered the comprehension questions.


Inferential statistics (ANOVA) revealed, regarding Study I, that participants from the game group showed a better immediate performance measure compared to control group participants (P < .001). In addition, Hedges g of .77 indicated a medium to large effect size. Regarding Study II, follow-up game group participants showed a better performance measure compared to participants from the follow-up control group (P = .002), here, a Hedges g of .82 implied a large effect size. Finally, in both studies, analyses indicated that complex process models are more difficult to comprehend (Study I: P < .001; Study II: P < .001)


Essentially, participants who played the serious game in Study I showed a better performance in the comprehension of process models in both studies. Hence, we conclude that this serious game can foster process model comprehension significantly.


Please cite as:

Winter M, Pryss R, Probst T, Reichert M

Learning to read by Learning to Write – An Evaluation of a Serious Game to Foster Business Process Model Comprehension

JMIR Preprints. 05/07/2019:15374

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.15374


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.