Published on in Vol 10, No 1 (2022): Jan-Mar

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at, first published .
An Evidence Map on Serious Games in Preventing Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Adolescents: Systematic Review About Outcome Categories Investigated in Primary Studies

An Evidence Map on Serious Games in Preventing Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Adolescents: Systematic Review About Outcome Categories Investigated in Primary Studies

An Evidence Map on Serious Games in Preventing Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Adolescents: Systematic Review About Outcome Categories Investigated in Primary Studies


1School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany

2Faculty of Health, University of Applied Sciences Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany

3Department of Digital Public Health and Biomedicine, School of Life Sciences, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany

4Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

5Institute of Gerontological Health Services and Nursing Research, Ravensburg-Weingarten University of Applied Sciences, Weingarten, Germany

6Bavarian Research Center for Digital Health and Social Care, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Kempten, Germany

Corresponding Author:

Kamil J Wrona, BSc, MSc, PhD

School of Public Health

Bielefeld University

Universitätsstr. 25

Bielefeld, 33615


Phone: 49 5211065160


Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a global health risk. Adolescents are at increased risk of infection for several reasons such as lack of knowledge, risky sexual behaviors, and lack of behavioral sills (eg, to negotiate safer sex). Given the fact that adolescents often use digital media and that serious games are considered to have the potential to change knowledge, attitudes and behavior, serious games represent an opportunity for the prevention of STIs.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to identify and systematically summarize the dimensions that have been investigated in primary studies on serious games targeting STI prevention among adolescents.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science. Studies published from 2009 to 2021 were included that assessed the effectiveness of serious games on adolescent sexual health. A total of 18 studies met the inclusion criteria and were categorized according to dimensions of effectiveness and user experience.

Results: Various dimensions of effectiveness and aspects of user experience were investigated in the primary studies. In total, 9 dimensions of effectiveness were observed: sexual behavior, behavioral intentions, knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, self-efficacy and personal limitations, character traits and future orientation, environmental and individual risk factors, risk perception and risk assessment, as well as normative beliefs and (social) norms. Furthermore, several dimensions related to user experience were investigated in primary studies, that is, motivation, acceptability, trustworthiness, comprehensibility, handling and control, perceived effectiveness, as well as satisfaction.

Conclusions: This review provides an overview of serious games interventions that are vastly different in approach, content, and even platform. In previous studies, knowledge has already been comprehensively assessed, and a positive influence of serious games on knowledge about sexual topics is evident. The results clearly show that adolescents’ sexual knowledge has been increased by the serious games interventions. However, methodological and content differences in the surveys make it difficult to draw conclusions about the effectiveness related to changes in attitudes and behavior.

JMIR Serious Games 2022;10(1):e30526



From a global perspective, the relevance of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is reflected in continued high numbers of HIV infections, particularly in African countries [1,2] and the fact that approximately 1 million people worldwide become infected with a curable STI every day [3,4]. In addition to specific risk groups such as men who have sex with men, sex workers, and intravenous drug users [5-9], adolescents are an important target group in STI prevention approaches. For example, increasing rates of infections among adolescents have been found for chlamydia in recent years [10,11]. Although studies indicate that knowledge of HIV has increased, knowledge of other STIs is significantly lower, even despite their widespread [12,13]. Misinformation as well as knowledge gaps related to STIs frequently occur among adolescents from poor to middle class backgrounds [14]. Lack of knowledge and low awareness of STIs as well as shame and fear inhibit adolescents from talking about STIs and contacting health care providers when problems arise [15]. These conditions may increase risky sexual behaviors and, thereby, the risk of acquiring an STI [16].

As a result of the high prevalence of STIs among adolescents and frequent use of digital media in this group, there is increasing consideration of using digital approaches as part of sexuality education and STI prevention in educational settings [17,18]. One of the instruments being discussed are digital games. Popularity and interest in these serious games have been growing in research and practice in recent years [19]. Serious games are an instrument of entertainment education, which include “any attempt to make learning [more] enjoyable, no matter if media-based, mediated or within a classroom setting” [20]. Various definitions for serious games exist, but all definition have, in common, to focus on the serious use of games to achieve goals, such as learning and education, by combining serious topics with entertaining and, in recent times frequently, multimedia aspects [21]. These serious games are challenging and engaging and supply the users with competencies useful in reality [22]. Therefore, serious games are characterized particularly by the use of a competency-based approach by integrating the game principle into the learning process and thus becoming part of this process [23]. Overall, digital game applications are applied with the aim of increasing attention and knowledge as well as changing attitudes and behavior [21]. Areas of disease prevention and health promotion for the application of serious games are comprehensive sexuality education (CSE), STI prevention, and promotion of sexual health [19,24]. The potential of serious games to positively influence knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors and to promote attention are goals that are also pursued in CSE [17]. Serious games, with their innovative character, thus form a new way to educate adolescents about sexual health and, thereby, contribute to STI prevention.

The characteristics of serious games offer manifold possibilities for STI prevention, which make their use reasonable. First, the entertaining nature of serious games offers the opportunity to facilitate communication about sensitive topics such as sexuality and sexual health [19,25]. Second, serious games allow to keep content anonymous and confidential, making it easier to deal with these sensitive topics [24]. Third, through the digital, fictional, and playful environment, serious games offer a low-threshold access and usage as well as the possibility to have different experiences without being exposed to real risk [26]. Fourth, the content of serious games can be adapted to the demands and requirements of the target group as a whole and even at an individual level through tailored approaches [24]. Owing to gender-, origin-, and culturally-specific differences as well as various sexual experiences and orientations, serious games offer great potential in STI prevention [24,26,27]. However, criticism related to serious games is expressed in that the content, target groups, as well as the quality of the games greatly differ, and existing evaluation studies are inconclusive. In studies on the effectiveness of serious games, the focus is on the measurement of so-called “soft facts,” which are collected, for example, through self-reported competence beliefs. Therefore, the results need to be evaluated with caution [21].

In order to implement serious games in practical work with adolescents, it is important to investigate whether and how serious games influence adolescents and impact STI prevention. This evidence map [28] based on a systematic review focusses on the outcomes, which have been investigated in previous primary studies related to serious games targeting STI prevention. The aim is not to summarize the direct effects of respective serious games, which are also quite heterogeneous in terms of approach and content, but to provide a systematic overview about the outcomes (effectiveness/impact and perceptions/user experience) that have been investigated to date.

We conducted a systematic literature review in 2 databases, namely, MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Web of Science to identify studies investigating serious games in the context of STI prevention, which have been published until March 2021. The search in PubMed was conducted in May 2019 and an update was performed in March 2021. The search in Web of Science was conducted in March 2021. The search strategy consisted of a combination of terms related to the type of the game with the field of action. For both databases, we used the following complete search algorithm:

(game* OR video game* OR interactive multimedia OR serious game*) AND (sexual health OR sexual transmitted infections OR sexual transmitted disease OR sexuality education OR hiv OR sti OR sexuality*)

In PubMed, we applied the filters to include only those studies published since 2009 because the aim was to identify only recent literature (published in the past decade) owing to the fast progress in the development of serious games. Furthermore, a filter was applied to restrict the search to studies published in English or German language. In addition, we used a backward snowballing technique by searching the reference list of studies included in the full-text screening.

To identify appropriate studies, 2 reviewers screened the studies with regard to their (1) title and abstract and (2) appraised the full-texts if inclusion criteria were fulfilled. The basic criteria for the combined screening of title and abstract was whether the information provided seemed to be related to serious games related to preventing STIs. Overall, 1559 manuscripts were identified after removal of duplicates. To ensure systematic management of the information, references located through the search were downloaded to a bibliographical software package (Citavi 6, Swiss Academic Software), which automatically identifies and removes duplicates.

Two authors (KI and KJW) carried out the title and abstract screening. Subsequently, KI and KJW independently reviewed the full texts (n=76) to determine whether the inclusion criteria were met. We defined inclusion and exclusion criteria (Table 1), which were used for the screening of full texts. According to this, studies that did not comply with serious games (n=10) or the target group of adolescents (n=15) were excluded. Furthermore, we excluded studies that did not describe an intervention study (n=7), did not comply with the evaluation of an intervention (n=15), or for further reasons (n=13) such as a focus on individuals who tested positive for an STI. There were no divergent appraisals between the 2 reviewers. From a total of 76 relevant studies (and 2 additional studies identified through the snowballing technique), 18 were identified for inclusion in this overview (Figure 1). Overall, the search algorithm used in PubMed proved to be very reliable, because the supplementary search in Web of Science led to only 1 additional record included in the synthesis.

We analyzed whether serious games have been used for STI prevention and CSE and mapped the results according to the levels of effectiveness/impact and perceptions/user experiences of users. The results are described in form of a qualitative overview, allowing for a systematization of the outcomes, which have been addressed in previous studies so far. We did not perform a quality appraisal of primary studies because various study designs (eg, randomized controlled trial [RCT], quasi-experimental study, pilot test) have been included and no meta-analysis was performed. The procedures and reporting of the systematic review follow the recommendations published in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement [29].

Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for screening of full texts.
PopulationAdolescents (9-21 years)Adults; particular risk groups (eg, men who have sex with men, drug users, sex workers); sexually transmitted infection/HIV-positive persons
Study designEmpirical study including an evaluation of a serious gameStudies of theoretical nature only with no empirical data
Type of studyAll published studies, identifiable via PubMed or Web of Science Abstract must be availableBooks; all forms of grey literature, including conference abstracts, commentaries, presentations, proceedings, regulatory data, unpublished trial data, government publications, dissertations/theses, journalistic interviews, policy reports as well as any other nonscientific material No abstract available
Focus of studySexually transmitted infections Comprehensive sex education or HIV/ sexually transmitted infection preventionNonsexually transmitted Noncomprehensive sexuality education or HIV/sexually transmitted infection prevention Other aspects in a broader sense of sexual health (eg, sexual violence, sexual dysfunction, use of antiviral therapy or HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis) not related to sexually transmitted infection prevention in the general population using digital technologies
Role of digital serious gameDigital serious games (including all digital games for learning purposes)No use of digital serious games Analogous serious games or gamification approaches
Language of publicationEnglish and GermanAll other languages other than English or German
Date of publicationJanuary 2009 to March 2021Before 2009
Figure 1. Flowchart for study selection. STI: sexually transmitted infection.
View this figure

Characteristics of the Studies

A total of 18 studies identified within the systematic review were included in the synthesis on effectiveness and user experiences investigated in primary studies related to serious games in STI prevention (Table 2). Three of the studies are usability tests that focus on usability, user experience, and cultural adaptation or adaptation, among other factors [30-32]. One of these studies only reported perceived efficacy [31]. Another study included a usability and a feasibility study, in which adapted computer-based components of an existing intervention are tested, and subsequently, a computer-only intervention developed based on these findings is deployed [33]. The aforementioned studies do not focus on efficacy, but they do provide evidence of effectiveness and insights into the play experience. For that reason, they were included in this systematic review. In total, 10 completely different serious games interventions have been focused upon in primary studies. The intervention that was used most frequently in the studies was “It’s Your Game”—it was used in 10 out of 18 studies. In each of the other studies, different interventions were used. Overall, 8 studies have been conducted as RCTs. Interventional studies used either a conventional health training or video games as controls. The target group consisted entirely of schoolchildren and teenagers between the ages of 12 and 19 years. Various study designs and methods have been used. The sample size ranges from 19 to 4562 participants. Table 2 presents the main information about the primary studies. Further details about the characteristics of the interventions are described in Multimedia Appendix 1.

Various dimensions of effectiveness and aspects of user experience were investigated in the primary studies. At least one dimension of effectiveness has been addressed in 16 of the 18 studies. In total, the following 9 dimensions of effectiveness were observed: (1) sexual behavior, (2) behavioral intentions, (3) knowledge, (4) attitudes and beliefs, (5) self-efficacy and personal limitations, (6) character traits and future orientation, (7) environmental and individual risk factors, (8) risk perception and risk assessment, and (9) normative beliefs and (social) norms.

Furthermore, 7 aspects related to user/gaming experience were investigated in overall 11 studies: (1) motivation, (2) acceptability, (3) trustworthiness, (4) comprehensibility, (5) handling and control, (6) perceived effectiveness, and (7) satisfaction. A full overview of the categorizations can be found in Table 3 and Table 4.

Table 2. Characteristics of the primary studies.
Authors, year of
publication, country
participants (n)
Age (years;
Study designControl groupMethodsFollow-Up
Bertozzi et al [34], 2018, IndiaMy future family39315-19Pilot study
Questionnaire (paper-and-pencil based, postgame) In-game data
Chib [35], 2011, PeruPlaneta Riesgo X10215-18Quasi-experimental panel design
Questionnaire (self-administered)
Chu et al [36], 2015, Hong KongMaking Smart Choices117612-16Pilot experiment with pretest and posttest
Knowledge: Questionnaire Feedback: Questionnaire and focus group interviews
Escobar-Chaves et al [30], 2011, Puerto RicoIt’s Your Game: Keep It Real7312-14Pilot study
Questionnaire (paper-and-pencil based) Class discussion Reactions and opinions from 2 teachers, a librarian and a social worker
Fiellin et al [37], 2017, USAPlay Forward: Elm City Stories33311-14Randomized controlled trialQuestionnaire (face-to-face assessments) In-game data
Gariepy et al [38], 2018, USAMobile videogame intervention2615-17Pilot study
Questionnaire (self-administered) Focus group discussions
Haruna et al [39], 2018, TanzaniaGame-Based Learning12011-15Randomized controlled trialQuestionnaire based Focus group interview
Markham et al [40], 2012, USAIt’s Your Game: Keep It Real1258mean 12.6Randomized controlled trialAudio-computer-assisted self-interview
Oliveira et al [41], 2016, BrazilPapo Reto2315-18Qualitative study (descriptive and exploratory)
Recorded workshops and speeches analyzed by content analysis
Peskin et al [42], 2015, USAIt’s Your Game: Keep It Real1374mean 14.3Randomized controlled trialAudio-computer-assisted self-interview
Peskin et al [43], 2019, USAIt’s Your Game: Keep It Real1543mean 13Randomized controlled trialAudio-enhanced, computer-assisted surveys
Potter et al [44], 2016, USAIt’s Your Game-Tech3143mean 12.7Randomized controlled trialAudio-enhanced, computer-assisted surveys
Rohrbach et al [45], 2019, USAIt’s Your Game: Keep It Real4562mean 15Quasi-experimental
cohort study

Audio-enhanced, computer-assisted surveys
Shegog et al [33], 2014, USAIt’s Your Game-Tech33,
pre/postusability test

Computer-based questionnaire
Shegog et al [31], 2017, USANative It’s Your Game4511-15Usability test (preadaption, adaption, postadaption)
Questionnaire (paper-and-pencil based)
Focus group discussions
Community advisory meetings

Shegog et al [32], 2021, USASecret of Seven Stones19mean 12Usability test
Questionnaire Qualitative interviews
Tortolero et al [46], 2010, USAIt’s Your Game: Keep It Real981mean 13Randomized controlled trialAudio-computer-assisted self-interview
Winskell et al [47], 2018, KenyaTumaini6011-14Randomized controlled trialAudio-computer-assisted self-interview For intervention arm: Postintervention survey Postintervention focus group discussions
Table 3. Dimensions of effectiveness.
KnowledgeAttitudes and beliefsSelf-efficacy and personal limitationsCharacter traits and future orientationEnvironmental and individual risk factorsRisk perception and risk assessmentNormative beliefs and (social) norms
Bertozzi et al (2018) [34]

Chib (2011) [35]

Chu et al (2015) [36]

Escobar-Chaves et al (2011) [30]

Fiellin et al (2017) [37]

Gariepy et al (2018) [38]

Haruna et al (2018) [39]

Markham et al (2012) [40]
Oliveira et al (2016) [41]

Peskin et al (2015) [42]
Peskin et al (2019) [43]

Potter et al (2016) [44]

Rohrbach et al (2019) [45]

Shegog et al (2014) [33]

Shegog et al (2017) [31]

Shegog et al (2021) [32]

Tortolero et al (2010) [46]

Winskell et al (2018) [47]
Table 4. Dimensions of aspects of user/gaming experience.
StudyMotivationAcceptabilityTrustworthinessComprehensibilityHandling and
Bertozzi et al (2018) [34]

Chib (2011) [35]

Chu et al (2015) [36]

Escobar-Chaves et al (2011) [30]
Fiellin et al (2017) [37]

Gariepy et al (2018) [38]

Haruna et al (2018) [39]

Markham et al (2012) [40]

Oliveira et al (2016) [41]

Peskin et al (2015) [42]

Peskin et al (2019) [43]

Potter et al (2016) [44]

Rohrbach et al (2019) [45]

Shegog et al (2014) [33]
Shegog et al (2017) [31]
Shegog et al (2021) [32]
Tortolero et al (2010) [46]

Winskell et al (2018) [47]

Dimensions of Effectiveness

Sexual Behavior

The dimension of participants’ sexual behavior has been reported in 7 of the 18 studies. Here, all 7 studies consider the influence of serious games on the delay of first sexual intercourse. Three studies found an impact on delay of the first sexual intercourse in the intervention group. These results refer to anal, oral, and vaginal intercourse [40,45,46]. Six of the 7 studies refer to sexual behavior in the past 3 months, with the following aspects: sexual intercourse in general and its frequency, condom use or contraception, alcohol and drug use, number of lifetime sexual partners, and frequency of unprotected intercourse [40,42-46]. Three studies have observed influences of serious games on individual aspects [40,45,46]. Overall, these studies were able to observe positive effects of the respective serious games on participants’ sexual behavior, although no study showed a positive result for all aspects. Four studies failed to find any effect of the serious game investigated on behavior, although positive trends were found in 1 study [43].

Behavioral Intentions

Nine studies focused on the impact of serious games on adolescents’ behavioral intentions. Of these 9 studies, 6 looked at abstinence intention until marriage or school completion [33,40,42-44,46]. Among these, 3 studies observed a positive effect of serious games, although this was found only for abstinence until marriage in 1 study [33] and only for abstinence for high school graduation in 1 study [46]. One study detected a positive effect for both aspects [40]. Three studies found no effect [42-44]. Seven of the 9 studies assessed the intentions to have sexual intercourse [33,37,40,42-44,46]. In this regard, 3 studies found a positive effect of the respective serious games in that participants in the intervention had fewer intentions to have sexual intercourse in the next year [40,43,46].


The impact of serious games on sexual knowledge as a key dimension to promote sexual health was investigated in 16 of the 18 studies. In 13 studies, the effectiveness was tested on the dimension of knowledge by using questions on a variety of sexual and reproductive health topics [33,35-40,42-47]. In summary, 12 of the 16 studies found positive effects of the investigated serious games on knowledge related to sexual and reproductive health as well as related topic areas. In 4 studies, the results were related to overall sexual and reproductive health, with all 4 studies finding a positive effect of serious games on participants’ knowledge [37-39,47]. Nine studies related to knowledge dimension regarding specific sexual and reproductive health topics [33,35,36,40,42-46]. Eight of these studies considered the effects of a serious game on participants’ contraceptive knowledge [33,35,40,42-46], of which 7 studies found a positive impact of the respective serious game [33,40,42-46]. Throughout 4 studies, the majority of participants perceived knowledge acquisition following the use of a serious game, providing evidence for a positive effect of the intervention on sexual knowledge [30,34,39,47].

Attitudes and Beliefs

Twelve studies examined attitudes and beliefs on sexual behavior and other sexual topics. Seven of these studies investigated reasons for or against performing sexual intercourse [33,40,42-46]. Five of the 7 studies found a positive effect of serious games [33,40,44-46]. Six of the 7 studies assessed attitudes toward condom use, for which none showed a significant positive effect of serious games [33,40,42-45]. Overall, 3 studies investigated attitudes toward sexual health and sexual behavior in a summary variable [35,37,47], but only Chib’s study [35] observed a positive impact of serious games on participants’ attitudes. Six studies showed positive effects only on specific aspects and 1 study found improved attitudes only for 2 subgroups. Two studies did not demonstrate positive effects on attitudes, but trends indicating a positive impact of serious games emerged. One study provided evidence of positive attitudinal change based on qualitative surveys.

Self-efficacy and Personal Limitations

Out of 18 studies, 10 assessed self-efficacy as a dimension of effectiveness. One study reported the self-efficacy dimension in a summary variable, consisting of pubertal support, condom use, contraceptive discussions with partner, and rejection of risky situations [47]. This study found positive effects of serious games on self-efficacy and positive evidence of change in the qualitative surveys and the gaming experience survey [47]. Seven studies analyzed the effects on self-efficacy of condom use and other contraceptive methods in a stand-alone variable [33,40,42-46]. In 6 studies, improvements in self-efficacy related to condom use and contraception were found within the intervention group [33,40,42-44,46]. Another aspect of self-efficacy considered by 7 of the 10 studies was the self-confidence to refuse sexual intercourse in a pressure situation when there is no consent for it [33,40,42-46]. Four of the 7 studies demonstrated positive effects of serious games on self-efficacy to refuse unwanted sex [40,43,45,46]. All 10 studies found a positive effect of serious games on the dimension of self-efficacy, although 5 studies did not show a positive influence of serious games in every aspect of self-efficacy. One study was not able to confirm the positive effects in all cultural subgroups. Related to personal boundaries, 4 studies observed positive effects of serious games and 1 of these studies added positive evidence from a feasibility study.

Character Traits and Future Orientation

Two out of the 18 studies examined the effects of serious games on participants’ character traits, such as character qualities (eg, responsibility) and future orientation (eg, having plans for one’s future) [40,42]. One study found positive effects [40], whereas the second study did not demonstrate any effect on participants’ character after using the serious game [42]. Four studies investigated the impact of serious games on future orientations [40,42,45,47]. None of the 4 studies found a significant effect after using the investigated serious game. However, the qualitative study conducted by Winskell et al [47] recorded positive expressions of participants and their parents on the topic of future orientation.

Environmental and Individual Risk Factors

The impact of serious games on selected environmental and individual risk factors (eg, exposure to risky situations) has been addressed in 9 studies. Six out of these 9 studies looked at the impact of the serious game on confronting risky situations [40,42-46]. Four studies did not observe a positive effect on this aspect [40,42-44]. Seven of the 9 studies made statements about the influence of serious games on how sexual topics are handled in the personal environment [40-45,47]. Communication about sexual issues with parents was addressed in 5 of the 7 studies [40-44]. In this regard, 1 study found significant improvements in parental communication after the use of a serious game [40]. Three studies showed no positive effects on parental communication [42-44]. In the qualitative survey by Oliveira et al [41], evidence of improved parental communication was shown.

Risk Perception and Risk Assessment

Two of the 18 studies examined efficacy in aspects of risk perception and risk assessment. Overall, positive effects on this were found but only to a slightly weak level [38,47]. No positive effects were found on alcohol as a risk factor [43].

Normative Beliefs and (Social) Norms

Nine out of the 18 studies examined the influence of serious games on participants’ (perceived) norms. In 6 studies, a positive influence of serious games on the perceived views of those around them about sex was found. Furthermore, in these 6 studies, a positive effect of serious games on perceived views in the personal environment about sexual abstinence was observed [33,40,42,43,45,46]. Among the 9 studies, 4 considered the aspect of perceived norms related to condom use, for which no study found a positive effect of serious games [33,43,44,46]. One of the 4 studies assessed norms related to HIV and STI and found a positive effect of serious games [43].

Aspects of User/Gaming Experience


Ten studies considered the aspect of motivation related to the use of serious games. Seven studies asked whether the respondents were willing to recommend the serious game to friends or classmates and in all these studies, the majority of participants would recommend the respective serious game to others [30-35,38,47]. Four of these 7 studies additionally integrated the question whether the participants were willing to repeat the serious game [30,33,38,47], where 3 of them found that a majority of participants were willing to do so [30,38,47]. Three out of the 10 studies addressed the aspect of motivation in general [32,39,41]. One study assessed motivation using questions in the domains of attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction related to the serious game, showing increased motivation among intervention participants [39]. Oliveira et al [41] inferred a positive motivational performance in the serious game. Therefore, 10 of 11 studies found a positive motivational performance in the serious game.


Acceptability toward the use of serious games has been investigated in 6 studies. In 2 studies, the duration and pace of the intervention was perceived to be appropriate [31,33], which was shown as determinant of acceptability. In the remaining studies, the method for assessing acceptability was not transparent [36,38]. However, these 2 studies indicated that acceptability toward serious games can at least be assumed based on the answers related to the user experience [36,38].


The trustworthiness of the content of serious games is another aspect that 5 of the 11 studies included in the survey of participants after the intervention was used. Four of the studies refer to the assessment of truthfulness and accuracy [30-33], and 1 study considered only the truthfulness of the information [35]. These 5 studies found that the majority of participants rated the content as credible and accurate [30-33,35].


Six out of the 11 studies considered the aspect of comprehensibility [30-33,35,39]. Overall, the comprehensibility of the serious games has been judged positively. This relates to the content as well as wording and terminology used in the serious game [30,31,33]. Particularly, qualitative studies described that the participants described the content of the game as easily understandable [39,41].

Handling and Control

Five of the 11 studies evaluated the handling and control of serious games. Four studies investigated the aspect of handling, among others, by assessing the difficulty of operation [31,33,35]. This was rated as easy by the majority of participants in all 4 studies. An adult’s assistance in using the serious game was reported in 3 of the 5 studies [30,31,33]. In these 3 studies, it was found that the majority of participants did not require adult assistance.

Perceived Effectiveness

Perceived effectiveness is another aspect explored in 10 of the 11 studies. Six studies considered the impact of serious games on perceived decision-making and conflict resolution skills [30-33,36,47]. Here, the majority of participants found the information conveyed through serious games to be helpful in making future decisions regarding sexual issues. Gariepy et al [38] found that most participants felt responsible for the decisions made in the game and the majority would transfer those decisions to real life.


In all 11 studies, statements of satisfaction were recorded. Seven studies asked about personal enjoyment of the game, and the majority of participants indicated to have enjoyed the game and its features [30-34,36,47]. Gariepy et al [38] demonstrated an association between enjoyment and effectiveness outcomes. When comparing traditional school instruction to the use of serious games, participants responded to serious games significantly more positively in almost all cases. The exception was the comparison with their own favorite video game [31-33]. In summary, all 11 studies showed increased satisfaction with the use of the serious game.


After reviewing previous studies conducted on serious games in the context of STI prevention, it can be summarized that both effectiveness and user experience have been investigated. However, a stronger focus on the parameters of effectiveness is needed by going beyond feasibility and usability studies and by applying adequate study designs such as RCTs and longitudinal studies. Knowledge about sexual health was the most commonly used dimension in studies investigating the effects of serious games in this area. Almost all studies found a positive effect of the respective serious game on participants’ knowledge. The second most common dimension related to participants’ attitudes and beliefs toward sexuality, sexual behavior, and other sexual topics. Here, just over half of the studies found that participants reported more positive attitudes after using the serious game. The positive effects were not evident in each study for all aspects related to attitudes. Furthermore, long-term effects related to intentions and behaviors related to sexual health need to be investigated.

Accordance With Previously Published Works

Evidence of nondigital curriculum-based sex and HIV education programs clearly shows that these programs do not hasten or increase sexual behavior. Instead, they either delay sexual behaviors or increase condom or contraceptive use [48]. However, a previous systematic review on digital media to improve adolescent health showed mixed results or effect in unexpected directions [49]. The results of the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior dimensions found in this systematic review on the effects of serious games show similarities to a meta-analysis published in 2015 [24] that investigated the effectiveness of disease prevention and health promotion interventions in the context of sexual health delivered via serious games. This meta-analysis also found an effect of serious games on sexual knowledge. However, no significant effects of serious games were found for the dimension of attitudes and behavior [24]. A parallel can be drawn with the ambiguous attitudinal and behavioral results presented in this systematic review. Further similarities can be seen in the positive effects on self-efficacy. For behavioral intentions, positive effects of serious games have been shown in the meta-analysis by DeSmet et al [24], which are divergent from those reported in this study.

Commonalities between the knowledge, attitudinal, and behavioral dimension results can also be found in a systematic review examining the impact of school-based skill-building behavioral interventions for STI prevention [50]. These behavioral interventions are primarily non–computer-based. Nevertheless, parallels to this work can be seen in the impact dimensions. For example, positive effects on knowledge and self-efficacy can also be found in the review by Picot et al [50]. Positive effects on behavior could only be shown in some studies and for certain aspects and subgroups, as in this work. In both reviews, the effects related to behavior were small. For the results related to attitudes and intentions, both reviews have in common that positive effects have not been observed in all studies [50].

Compared to the results of 3 meta-analyses, the results of this study show similarities and differences. The meta-analyses refer to interventions used to promote sexual health and prevent STIs [51-53]. One meta-analysis for this includes computer-based interventions that do not exclusively target adolescents [51]. The other 2 meta-analyses do not exclusively include computer-based interventions but narrow their analysis to target adolescents [52,53]. Overall, the 3 meta-analyses detected effects of the interventions on knowledge [51-53]. Two meta-analyses also showed effects on self-efficacy and behavioral intentions [51,53], with 1 meta-analysis additionally finding positive effects on attitudes [53]. Positive behavioral effects can be found in all 3 studies [51-53]. Thus, the knowledge and self-efficacy outcomes show parallels to the intervention effects analyzed in this systematic review. Differences in the results appear in the effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior. For these, no unambiguously positive results can be found in our systematic review compared to the results of the meta-analyses.

Two further meta-analyses identified positive significant effects of computer-based interventions on sexual behavior [54,55]. These publications showed clearer effects of computer-based interventions compared to those shown in this study. However, none of these meta-analyses were limited to adolescents [54,55]. One meta-analysis focused exclusively on HIV prevention interventions [54] and 1 meta-analysis investigated further interventions that aim to promote health-seeking behaviors in addition to interventions related to sexual behaviors [55].

In summary, there is a need for further studies investigating the effects of serious games on knowledge, attitude, and behavior, which go beyond computer-based interventions and which compare their effects with established (nondigital or hybrid) STI prevention strategies among adolescents. Future studies need to consider specific challenges of evaluating impacts of interventions on sexual behaviors among adolescents, particularly among adolescents who may not yet be sexually active. For that reason, longitudinal study designs are needed, which understand serious games as complex interventions within complex systems.

Limitations in This Review

This systematic review has been able to provide an overview of the current state of evidence of serious games in the context of STI prevention. However, owing to the heterogeneity of studies (eg, differences in interventions, data collection methods, follow-up periods), a meta-analysis was not possible. Moreover, these variations may explain the partly divergent results regarding the effects of serious games. In addition, high attrition, low response rates, or refusal to participate among control and intervention participants, as well as the collection of self-reported information in some studies represent key limitations that must be considered when interpreting the results. Beyond the methodological and content-wise differences that may have influenced the comparison of the studies, there are further limitations related to the conduction of this systematic review. The search was based on 2 databases (PubMed and Web of Science). The dimensions of effects investigated in this systematic review are derived from the parameters used in the primary studies. It should be noted that the authors of the primary studies may have either a different understanding of or used different ways for operationalizing each dimension. An additional limitation is the fact that there are several interventions focusing on the same intervention (“It’s Your Game”), which may also impact the variety of dimensions under consideration in previous studies. Furthermore, it should be noted that all studies found effects of the respective serious game under consideration. It should be questioned to what extent intervention studies that did not find effects for one dimension were not published (publication bias) and, thus, a distorted picture exists regarding the effectiveness of serious games.


Overall, the effects of serious games in CSE and STI prevention have been shown in this systematic review. However, not all dimensions show comparable effects and some dimensions have only been considered in single or few studies. In addition, the data collection for investigating the effect dimensions is divergent, making comparisons difficult. Nevertheless, it can be stated that above all, knowledge is already comprehensively assessed and a positive influence of serious games on knowledge about sexual topics is evident. In contrast, only limited evidence is available for effects of serious games related to attitudes and behavior. Particularly for sexual behavior, there is a lack of results, as this dimension could only be surveyed in a few studies. This is due to methodological deficits in the surveys, which make it difficult to determine changes in attitudes and behavior, and because sexual topics continue to be taboo in many societies, which limits the ability to survey sexual behavior. According to the results of this systematic review, serious games show potential in the context of STI prevention. Owing to a lack of evidence regarding the effects on attitudes and behavior, no explicit benefit of serious games compared to established (nondigital) methods of STI prevention can be demonstrated. One aspect that should be pursued in this regard is the comparison with classical prevention activities that do not use (digital) media. Until now, there is missing evidence on long-term effects, particularly related to the impacts of serious games on attitudes and behaviors.


We acknowledge support for the publication costs by the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Characteristics of the interventions.

DOCX File , 15 KB

  1. Meier BM, Gostin LO. The joint United Nations programme on HIV/AIDS with communities for human rights. In: Human Rights in Global Health: Rights-Based Governance for a Globalizing World. Geneva: Oxford University Press; 2018.
  2. World health statistics 2018: Monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. In: World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
  3. Newman L, Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Wijesooriya NS, Unemo M, Low N, et al. Global Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Four Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections in 2012 Based on Systematic Review and Global Reporting. PLoS One 2015;10(12):e0143304 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Sexually transmitted infections (STI). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.   URL: [accessed 2021-01-20]
  5. HIV and STI prevention among men who have sex with men. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2015.   URL: https:/​/www.​​sites/​default/​files/​media/​en/​publications/​Publications/​hiv-sti-prevention-among-men-who-have-sex-with-men-guidance.​pdf [accessed 2021-01-20]
  6. Prevention and Treatment of HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections for Sex Workers in Low- And Middle-Income Countries: Recommendations for a Public Health Approach. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
  7. Report on Global Sexually Transmitted Infection Surveillance 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
  8. Degenhardt L, Peacock A, Colledge S, Leung J, Grebely J, Vickerman P, et al. Global prevalence of injecting drug use and sociodemographic characteristics and prevalence of HIV, HBV, and HCV in people who inject drugs: a multistage systematic review. The Lancet Global Health 2017 Dec;5(12):e1192-e1207. [CrossRef]
  9. Mieier BM, Gostin LO. Joint United Nations programme on HIV/AIDS. In: Human Rights in Global Health: Rights-Based Governance for a Globalizing World. Geneva: Oxford Scholarship Online; 2018.
  10. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2017. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.   URL: [accessed 2021-01-20]
  11. Chlamydia infection: annual epidemiological report for 2017. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. 2019.   URL: https:/​/www.​​en/​publications-data/​chlamydia-infection-annual-epidemiological-report-2017 [accessed 2021-01-20]
  12. von Rosen F, von Rosen A, Müller-Riemenschneider F, Damberg I, Tinnemann P. STI Knowledge in Berlin Adolescents. IJERPH 2018 Jan 10;15(1):110. [CrossRef]
  13. Cohall A, Kassotis J, Parks R, Vaughan R, Bannister H, Northridge M. Adolescents in the age of AIDS: myths, misconceptions, and misunderstandings regarding sexually transmitted diseases. J Natl Med Assoc 2001 Feb;93(2):64-69. [Medline]
  14. Newton-Levinson A, Leichliter JS, Chandra-Mouli V. Sexually Transmitted Infection Services for Adolescents and Youth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Perceived and Experienced Barriers to Accessing Care. J Adolesc Health 2016 Jul;59(1):7-16 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Blanc AK, Tsui AO, Croft TN, Trevitt JL. Patterns and Trends in Adolescents' Contraceptive Use and Discontinuation in Developing Countries and Comparisons With Adult Women. IPSRH 2009 Jun;35(02):063-071. [CrossRef]
  16. Avery L, Lazdane G. What do we know about sexual and reproductive health of adolescents in Europe? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2008 Mar;13(1):58-70. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. International technical guidance on sexuality education. An evidence-informed approach. UNESCO.   URL: [accessed 2021-01-20]
  18. Montgomery P, Wendy K. Review of the evidence on sexuality education: report to inform the update of the UNESCO International technical guidance on sexuality education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2018.   URL: https:/​/healtheducationresources.​​library/​documents/​review-evidence-sexuality-education-report-inform-update-unesco-international [accessed 2021-01-20]
  19. Shegog R, Brown K, Bull S, Christensen JL, Hieftje K, Jozkowski KN, et al. Serious Games for Sexual Health. Games Health J 2015 Apr;4(2):69-77. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Breuer J, Bente G. Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Journal for Computer Game Culture. 2010.   URL: https:/​/www.​​publication/​200737995_Why_So_Serious_On_the_Relation_of_Serious_Games_and_Learning [accessed 2021-01-20]
  21. Breuer J, Schmitt J. Serious Games in der Gesundheitskommunikation. In: Handbuch Gesundheitskommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2017:1-11.
  22. Haoran G, Bazakidi E, Zary N. Serious Games in Health Professions Education: Review of Trends and Learning Efficacy. Yearb Med Inform 2019 Aug;28(1):240-248 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Sostmann K, Tolks D, Fischer M, Buron S. Serious Games for Health: Spielend lernen und heilen mit Computerspielen? GMS Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie 2010;6(2):12. [CrossRef]
  24. DeSmet A, Shegog R, Van Ryckeghem D, Crombez G, De Bourdeaudhuij I. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Interventions for Sexual Health Promotion Involving Serious Digital Games. Games Health J 2015 Apr;4(2):78-90. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. D'Cruz J, Santa Maria D, Dube S, Markham C, McLaughlin J, Wilkerson JM, et al. Promoting Parent-Child Sexual Health Dialogue with an Intergenerational Game: Parent and Youth Perspectives. Games Health J 2015 Apr;4(2):113-122 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Brüll P, Ruiter RA, Wiers RW, Kok G. Gaming for Safer Sex: Young German and Turkish People Report No Specific Culture-Related Preferences Toward Educational Games Promoting Safer Sex. Games Health J 2016 Dec;5(6):357-365. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Baranowski T, Blumberg F, Buday R, DeSmet A, Fiellin LE, Green CS, et al. Games for Health for Children-Current Status and Needed Research. Games Health J 2016 Feb;5(1):1-12 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Miake-Lye IM, Hempel S, Shanman R, Shekelle PG. What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Syst Rev 2016 Feb 10;5:28 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:a. [CrossRef]
  30. Escobar-Chaves S, Shegog R, Moscoso-Alvarez M, Markham C, Tortolero-Luna G, Peskin M, et al. Cultural tailoring and feasibility assessment of a sexual health middle school curriculum: a pilot test in Puerto Rico. J Sch Health 2011 Aug;81(8):477-484. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  31. Shegog R, Craig Rushing S, Gorman G, Jessen C, Torres J, Lane TL, et al. NATIVE-It's Your Game: Adapting a Technology-Based Sexual Health Curriculum for American Indian and Alaska Native youth. J Prim Prev 2017 Apr;38(1-2):27-48. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  32. Shegog R, Armistead L, Markham C, Dube S, Song H, Chaudhary P, et al. A Web-Based Game for Young Adolescents to Improve Parental Communication and Prevent Unintended Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infections (The Secret of Seven Stones): Development and Feasibility Study. JMIR Serious Games 2021 Jan 27;9(1):e23088 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  33. Shegog R, Peskin MF, Markham C, Thiel M, Karny E, Addy RC, et al. It's Your Game-Tech: Toward Sexual Health in the Digital Age. Creat Educ 2014 Aug;5(15):1428-1447 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Bertozzi E, Bertozzi-Villa A, Kulkarni P, Sridhar A. Collecting family planning intentions and providing reproductive health information using a tablet-based video game in India. Gates Open Res 2018;2:20 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  35. Chib A. Promoting sexual health education via gaming: evidence from the barrios of Lima, Peru. In: Handbook of Research On Improving Learning And Motivation Through Educational Games. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global; 2011:895-912.
  36. Chu SKW, Kwan AC, Reynolds R, Mellecker RR, Tam F, Lee G, et al. Promoting Sex Education Among Teenagers Through an Interactive Game: Reasons for Success and Implications. Games Health J 2015 Jun;4(3):168-174. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Fiellin LE, Hieftje KD, Pendergrass TM, Kyriakides TC, Duncan LR, Dziura JD, et al. Video Game Intervention for Sexual Risk Reduction in Minority Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2017 Sep 18;19(9):e314 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  38. Gariepy AM, Hieftje K, Pendergrass T, Miller E, Dziura JD, Fiellin LE. Development and Feasibility Testing of a Videogame Intervention to Reduce High-Risk Sexual Behavior in Black and Hispanic Adolescents. Games Health J 2018 Dec;7(6):393-400 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  39. Haruna H, Hu X, Chu S, Mellecker R, Gabriel G, Ndekao P. Improving Sexual Health Education Programs for Adolescent Students through Game-Based Learning and Gamification. IJERPH 2018 Sep 17;15(9):2027. [CrossRef]
  40. Markham CM, Tortolero SR, Peskin MF, Shegog R, Thiel M, Baumler ER, et al. Sexual risk avoidance and sexual risk reduction interventions for middle school youth: a randomized controlled trial. J Adolesc Health 2012 Mar;50(3):279-288 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  41. Oliveira RNGD, Gessner R, Souza VD, Fonseca RMGSD. Limits and possibilities of an online game for building adolescents' knowledge of sexuality. Cien Saude Colet 2016 Aug;21(8):2383-2392 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  42. Peskin MF, Shegog R, Markham CM, Thiel M, Baumler ER, Addy RC, et al. Efficacy of It's Your Game-Tech: A Computer-Based Sexual Health Education Program for Middle School Youth. J Adolesc Health 2015 May;56(5):515-521 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  43. Peskin MF, Coyle KK, Anderson PM, Laris BA, Glassman JR, Franks HM, et al. Replication of It's Your Game…Keep It Real! in Southeast Texas. J Prim Prev 2019 Jun;40(3):297-323. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  44. Potter SC, Coyle KK, Glassman JR, Kershner S, Prince MS. in South Carolina: A Group Randomized Trial Evaluating the Replication of an Evidence-Based Adolescent Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention Program. Am J Public Health 2016 Sep;106(S1):S60-S69. [CrossRef]
  45. Rohrbach LA, Donatello RA, Moulton BD, Afifi AA, Meyer KI, De Rosa CJ. Effectiveness Evaluation of It's Your Game: Keep It Real, a Middle School HIV/Sexually Transmitted Infection/Pregnancy Prevention Program. J Adolesc Health 2019 Mar;64(3):382-389. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  46. Tortolero SR, Markham CM, Peskin MF, Shegog R, Addy RC, Escobar-Chaves SL, et al. It's Your Game: Keep It Real: delaying sexual behavior with an effective middle school program. J Adolesc Health 2010 Feb;46(2):169-179 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  47. Winskell K, Sabben G, Akelo V, Ondeng'e K, Obong'o C, Stephenson R, et al. A Smartphone Game-Based Intervention (Tumaini) to Prevent HIV Among Young Africans: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 Aug 01;6(8):e10482 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  48. Kirby DB, Laris B, Rolleri LA. Sex and HIV education programs: their impact on sexual behaviors of young people throughout the world. J Adolesc Health 2007 Mar;40(3):206-217. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  49. Guse K, Levine D, Martins S, Lira A, Gaarde J, Westmorland W, et al. Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health 2012 Dec;51(6):535-543. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  50. Picot J, Shepherd J, Kavanagh J, Cooper K, Harden A, Barnett-Page E, et al. Behavioural interventions for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections in young people aged 13-19 years: a systematic review. Health Educ Res 2012 Jun;27(3):495-512. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  51. Bailey JV, Murray E, Rait G, Mercer CH, Morris RW, Peacock R, et al. Computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion: systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J STD AIDS 2012 Jun;23(6):408-413. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  52. Mon Kyaw Soe N, Bird Y, Schwandt M, Moraros J. STI Health Disparities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Preventive Interventions in Educational Settings. IJERPH 2018 Dec 11;15(12):2819. [CrossRef]
  53. Morales A, Espada JP, Orgilés M, Escribano S, Johnson BT, Lightfoot M. Interventions to reduce risk for sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: A meta-analysis of trials, 2008-2016. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0199421 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  54. Noar S, Black H, Pierce L. Efficacy of computer technology-based HIV prevention interventions: a meta-analysis. AIDS 2009;23(1):107-115. [CrossRef]
  55. Portnoy DB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Johnson BT, Carey MP. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988-2007. Prev Med 2008 Jul;47(1):3-16 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

CSE: comprehensive sexuality education
PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
RCT: randomized controlled trial
STI: sexually transmitted infection

Edited by N Zary; submitted 18.05.21; peer-reviewed by K Winskell, A Tan; comments to author 28.06.21; revised version received 01.10.21; accepted 23.10.21; published 02.02.22


©Karina Ilskens, Kamil J Wrona, Christoph Dockweiler, Florian Fischer. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (, 02.02.2022.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Serious Games, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.