This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Serious Games for Health and Medicine (641) Games and Gamification for Health (604) Parent and Child Education on Healthy Eating and Nutrition (161) Innovations and Technology for Healthy Eating Education (400) Obesity and Nutrition as Public Health Problem (279) Behavior Change (652) Formative Evaluation and Development of Games (65) Game Design and Efficacy of Game Elements (81)

Published on in Vol 10, No 2 (2022): Apr-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/33412, first published .
HelperFriend, a Serious Game for Promoting Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors in Children: Design and Pilot Study

HelperFriend, a Serious Game for Promoting Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors in Children: Design and Pilot Study

HelperFriend, a Serious Game for Promoting Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors in Children: Design and Pilot Study

Authors of this article:

Ismael Edrein Espinosa-Curiel1 Author Orcid Image ;   Edgar Efrén Pozas-Bogarin1 Author Orcid Image ;   Maryleidi Hernández-Arvizu1 Author Orcid Image ;   Maria Elena Navarro-Jiménez1 Author Orcid Image ;   Edwin Emeth Delgado-Pérez2 Author Orcid Image ;   Juan Martínez-Miranda1 Author Orcid Image ;   Humberto Pérez-Espinosa1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (5) Tweetations (3) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, Unidad de Transferencia Tecnológica Tepic, Tepic, Nayarit, Mexico

    2Centro de Estudios e Investigaciones en Comportamiento, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

    Corresponding Author:

    Ismael Edrein Espinosa-Curiel, PhD

    Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada

    Unidad de Transferencia Tecnológica Tepic

    Andador 10, entre calles 3 y 4, Ciudad del Conocimiento

    Tepic, Nayarit, 63173

    Mexico

    Phone: 52 3111295930 ext 28607

    Email: ecuriel@cicese.mx


    Background: The use of health games is a promising strategy for educating and promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors among children.

    Objective: We aimed to describe the design and development of a serious game, called HelperFriend, and evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects in children in a pilot study. HelperFriend is a vicarious experiential video game designed to promote 3 lifestyle behaviors among young children: physical activity, healthy eating, and socioemotional wellness.

    Methods: Participants aged 8 to 11 years were recruited from an elementary school and randomized to receive a healthy lifestyle behavior educational talk (control) or play six 30-minute sessions with HelperFriend (intervention). Assessments were conducted at baseline (T0) and after the intervention (ie, 4 weeks) (T1). The primary outcome was gain in knowledge. The secondary outcomes were intention to conduct healthy behaviors, dietary intake, and player satisfaction.

    Results: Knowledge scores of intervention group participants increased from T0 to T1 for physical activity (t14=2.01, P=.03), healthy eating (t14=3.14, P=.003), and socioemotional wellness (t14=2.75, P=.008). In addition, from T0 to T1, the intervention group improved their intention to perform physical activity (t14=2.82, P=.006), healthy eating (t14=3.44, P=.002), and socioemotional wellness (t14=2.65, P=.009); and there was a reduction in their intake of 13 unhealthy foods. HelperFriend was well received by intervention group.

    Conclusions: HelperFriend appears to be feasible and acceptable for young children. In addition, this game seems to be a viable tool to help improve the knowledge, the intention to conduct healthy behaviors, and the dietary intake of children; however, a well-powered randomized controlled trial is needed to prove the efficacy of HelperFriend.

    JMIR Serious Games 2022;10(2):e33412

    doi:10.2196/33412

    Keywords

    serious game; children; education and behavior change; healthy lifestyle behaviors; physical activity; healthy eating; socioemotional wellness 


    Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors

    Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors (eg, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet, and sedentary time) put individuals at high risk of developing several health conditions (eg, dental caries, hypertension, diabetes, cardiopathy, and cancer) and are key drivers of obesity and being overweight [1-3]. In contrast, healthy lifestyle behaviors (eg, physical activity and healthy diet) can provide a general feeling of well-being and are the foundation of disease prevention [4]. Individuals who embrace healthy lifestyle behaviors can withstand health risks linked to disability and illness in later life [4]. Healthy lifestyle behaviors can benefit people of all ages; however, it is crucial to encourage these behaviors from early childhood—when habits are formed—because they are likely to be maintained during adulthood [3,5,6].

    Two critical healthy lifestyle behaviors for children are healthy eating and physical activity. Children need to have a correct diet [7], increase the intake of healthy food, decrease the intake of unhealthy food [8], and engage in a minimum of 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity daily [9]. These behaviors help prevent weight gain in children [10,11] and are included in the strategies to face the dramatic increase in childhood obesity, given that childhood obesity is associated with unhealthy eating and physical inactivity [12,13]. Despite the importance of these behaviors, many children do not perform them. For example, in Mexico, only 43.5% of children meet the recommended intake of fruits [14], 22% of children meet the recommended intake of vegetables [14], and 17.3% of children engage in at least 60 minutes of daily physical activity [15]. The promotion of these behaviors should start when children are young (between 8 and 11 years), because these are the years during which rates of being overweight and obesity increase significantly [15].

    Lifestyle interventions should focus on healthy eating and physical activity to have a more significant effect on health [10]. In addition, social and emotional factors should be taken into account when developing lifestyle interventions because these factors affect healthy eating and physical activity [16,17]. Therefore, it is essential that children also learn how to recognize and manage emotions, establish and maintain constructive and healthy relationships, make responsible decisions, and avoid unhealthy social and emotional behaviors associated with eating and physical activity [18,19].

    Serious Games for Health

    In recent years, the development of serious games as innovative methods to support health education and treatment initiatives and programs has increased [20]. Serious games integrate engagement and fun elements (eg, stories, levels, rewards, and feedback) with educational and psychological resources and techniques to achieve health outcomes [21]. Serious games for health can include the simulation of real-life situations, collection of information that supports the identification of behaviors, and provision of information and suggestions to guide the process to improve attitudes and behaviors of players [20]. Thus, they offer the possibility to support initiatives to deliver education and health services to populations that currently cannot or do not obtain necessary access to these services due to costs, logistical issues, stigma, or convenience [22]. There are currently serious health games for a wide variety of purposes, such as health education, physical and psychological therapy, and disease self-management [20,23].

    Serious games are increasingly being used to encourage children to adopt healthy lifestyle behaviors, leveraging the fact that most children enjoy playing video games [24]. However, there are mixed opinions about this strategy. One concern is related to screen time—screen time is considered to be a risk factor for several health, emotional, and psychological problems in children [25,26]. However, it appears that screen time for playing video games does not represent as high a risk when compared with that for watching television [27]. Another concern is the effectiveness of these games because, while most studies have reported positive effects on obesity-related outcomes (improvement of weight-related parameters, physical activity, or dietary behavior and knowledge), these effects were small [28,29]. In addition, while many games focus on improving health knowledge, this does not necessarily result in behavioral change [28]. Conversely, several studies [30-32] have shown that serious games offer an enormous advantage for health promotion interventions in children.

    Video games for promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors in children are aimed to improve knowledge about nutrition, eating habits, and exercise; increase physical activity while playing (exergames); change eating behaviors; or combine several approaches [28,31,33,34]. Nutrition and eating habits–related games focus on the concepts of energy balance [35,36], MyPlate guidelines [37], the 5 macronutrients of foods [38], Mediterranean diet and behavioral moderation [39], healthy and unhealthy nutrition [40,41], and dietary energy density [42]. Despite the importance of psychosocial or psychological aspects of nutrition and eating habits, only one game considered these aspects through the integration of the coping of stress technique [42]. Although positive results were obtained in these studies [35-42], there is still a need to understand the application and limitations of such games as well as how to improve their effectiveness, such as the inclusion of the underlying mechanisms for behavioral change of video games [31] or the integration of psychosocial aspects in video games [28]. In addition, none of these games implemented a vicarious experiential environment that includes behavior change techniques to promote physical activity, promote healthy eating, and address social and emotional issues related to these behaviors in young children.

    Objective and Hypotheses

    We aimed to design and develop a motion-controlled serious game for young children (HelperFriend) and evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects. We hypothesized that children who played the game would demonstrate (1) better knowledge, (2) greater intention to carry out healthy lifestyle behaviors, and (3) improvements in dietary intake and that (4) children would enjoy playing the game.


    HelperFriend Video Game

    Design and Development

    HelperFriend was developed by a multidisciplinary team that included nutritionists, psychologists, physical activity experts, human–computer interaction experts, and software engineers based on published design methodology [43]. The methodology included activities from game implementation to evaluation based on 4 essential principles: a procedure-centric approach, expert collaboration, agile development, and low-cost modeling. The knowledge domains of HelperFriend are physical activity, healthy eating, and socioemotional wellness.

    HelperFriend integrates experiential and vicarious learning. In experiential learning environment, learners engage in direct experiences to enhance their knowledge, skills, and values through human–environment interaction in a cycle of doing, reflecting, concluding, and trying the learned experience [44]. In vicarious learning, individuals learn from the experiences of others (eg, by observing the choices another person makes and the consequences they have on their health). By observing the behavior of others, individuals can identify difficulties and expectations associated with behaviors and acquire the information and competencies to perform the behavior successfully [45].

    In addition, several behavior change techniques [46] were integrated into the game elements to generate an attractive and stimulating environment in which knowledge and healthy lifestyle behaviors are encouraged and reinforced: instruction on how to perform the behavior, providing information about health consequences, behavioral practice, behavioral substitution, incentives and rewards, goal setting, reviewing behaviors goal, monitoring behaviors, providing feedback on behavior, discrepancies between current behaviors and goals, monitoring emotion consequences, and prompts or cues. These behavior change techniques are based on behavioral, cognitive, and social cognitive theories that have ample empirical evidence to demonstrate their usefulness in adopting healthy lifestyles [47-50].

    Description

    In HelperFriend, the players are secret agents who need to care for a group of children who forgot healthy lifestyle behaviors because a villain chef erased their memory. In each match, the player needs to ensure that one of these children engages in physical activity, eats well, and performs socioemotional activities to improve their health (Figure 1). The children characters continuously interact with the player, expressing their necessities or stating situations for which they need help. Player actions that improve the children's lifestyle behaviors add points. The game session is finished when the player presses the finish button. At the end, the player can earn extra points if their decisions helped the child to meet healthy lifestyle recommendations. The player has full-body interaction to encourage physical activity and improve satisfaction and fun [51]. A video of the game is provided as Multimedia Appendix 1.

    ‎
    Figure 1. The main screen of HelperFriend: (A) child being cared for, (B) coins score, (C) button to carry out physical activity, (D) button for feeding the child, (E) button to carry out socioemotional activities, (F) health bar of the child, (G) game indicators section, and (H) finish button.
    View this figure
    Modules
    Overview

    Each module increases in difficulty to keep players engaged and having fun until the end of the video game. Modules have 3 components. The education component teaches basic health knowledge. The training component encourages players to practice healthy lifestyle behaviors. The challenge component presents challenging situations in which players have to help the children.

    Physical Activity

    This module (Figure 2) addresses World Health Organization physical activity recommendations for children and adolescents (aged 5 to 17 years). Children and adolescents should engage in a minimum of 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity on a daily basis, most of which should consist of aerobic exercise [9]. Engaging in more than 60 minutes of physical activity provides additional health benefits. In addition, vigorous physical activities and muscle and bone strengthening activities each should be incorporated at least 3 days per week.

    ‎
    Figure 2. Physical activity screens: (A) screen for selecting a physical activity, (B) child doing physical activity, (C) alert feedback screen because the player selected a sedentary activity, and (D) physical activity situation in which the child needs the player's help.
    View this figure
    Healthy Eating

    This module (Figure 3) addresses diet. According to the Mexican Official Standard [7], a correct diet for children is one that is complete, balanced, innocuous, suitable, and varied. In addition, this module addresses portion intake and recommendations that children should eat approximately 5 times a day [52], increase water and healthy food (including fruits and vegetables) consumption, and decrease unhealthy food (eg, candies, sweetened cereals, and sugary drinks) consumption [8].

    ‎
    Figure 3. Healthy eating screens: (A) screen teaching player about complete diet, (B) screen for selecting food, (C) feeding information screen, and (D) feeding situation in which the child needs the player's help.
    View this figure
    Socioemotional

    This module (Figure 4) addresses social and emotional behaviors related to physical activity and healthy eating. Children need to acquire skills to recognize and manage emotions, establish and maintain constructive and healthy relationships, take an interest in the well-being of others, and make responsible decisions [18,19]. Examples of the social and emotional issues included are low motivation to improve exercise and eating habits, emotions associated with eating junk food, and the influence of parents and friends on eating habits and physical activity.

    ‎
    Figure 4. Socioemotional wellness screens: (A) screen where the child shows a socioemotional situation to the player, (B) screen for selecting a socioemotional activity, (C) alert feedback message because the player made an inadequate socioemotional activity choice, and (D) socioemotional situation in which the child needs the player's help.
    View this figure

    Intervention

    Overview

    We conducted a parallel randomized controlled pilot trial over 4 weeks between May and June 2019 in an elementary school in Mexico.

    Ethics

    School administrators and teachers gave written permission for the trial to be performed at school facilities. All study procedures were approved by the institutional review board of the Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (2S.3.1 HUM 2019). No changes occurred to the methods after the beginning of the trial.

    Participants

    Students (n=40) from 3 school groups was considered for this study. Inclusion criteria were being aged 8 to 11 years and not receiving pharmacological treatment. Exclusion criteria were having been diagnosed with or having an ongoing neuropsychiatric disorder, a physical problem (because the game required children to interact through whole-body movements), and obesity treatment in the past 6 months. Written informed consent was obtained from parents of children who expressed interest in participating in the study.

    Design

    Children were randomly allocated to either the control group or the intervention group. The children in the intervention group played HelperFriend during six 30-minute game sessions. All playing sessions were conducted over 21 days. We set up 3 gaming stations in a room; each station contained a PC, a 50-inch screen, a Kinect sensor V2, and the HelperFriend video game. Participants in the control group received only a 45-minute talk about the importance of healthy behaviors, such as engaging in physical activity, eating healthy, and maintaining socioemotional health; no further intervention was applied.

    Outcome Measures

    Outcomes were assessed in both groups the week after being assigned to the groups (T0) and 4 weeks after baseline (T1). The primary outcome was the gain in knowledge measured using a questionnaire (developed by the research group and designed specifically for the serious game). The questionnaire was evaluated in a pilot with 5 children and adapted. The final questionnaire consisted of 82 questions in 3 sections: physical activity (13 questions, each with 3 response options), healthy eating (64 questions, each with 3 to 5 response options in food groups, food portions equivalence, correct diet, and healthy/unhealthy food subsections), and socioemotional wellness (5 questions, each with 4 response options). Figure 5 provides some examples of the questions. Children completed the questionnaire by themselves. The sum of questions that had been appropriately answered for each section was calculated.

    ‎
    Figure 5. Healthy behaviors knowledge questionnaire example questions.
    View this figure

    Secondary outcomes were intention to conduct healthy behaviors, dietary intake, and player experience satisfaction.

    Children’s intention to conduct healthy behaviors was measured using a questionnaire tailored specifically for the serious game. The questionnaire was pilot-tested with 5 children and adapted. The final questionnaire (Multimedia Appendix 2) consisted of 33 questions in 3 sections: physical activity (4 questions), healthy eating and correct diet (24 questions), and socioemotional wellness (5 questions). These questions state everyday situations that children experiment in their daily lives, and they have to decide what action to take to solve the case. Physical activity, healthy eating, and socioemotional wellness questions have 3, 3, and 4 response options, respectively. Questions related to correct diet have 3 response options and use a graphical representation to facilitate children's answers (a previous study [53] used similar graphical questionnaires with children). For each question, there was only 1 appropriate answer, and children completed the questionnaire by themselves. The sum of questions that had been appropriately answered for each section was calculated.

    Dietary behavior was measured with a food frequency intake questionnaire [41]. This questionnaire was explicitly designed for the diet of school-age Mexican children and included features of the highest validated food frequency questionnaires. It consists of 78 food items considered to be indicators for healthy and unhealthy eating behaviors. For each item, a 7-point scale, from 0 (never) to 6 (two or more times per day), is used to indicate the frequency that the food is consumed. Each question was scored individually. In order to facilitate the completion of the questionnaire, a facilitator read the questions to the children, who only had to answer with the number of times that they had eaten the food in the past month.

    Player experience satisfaction was only assessed in the intervention group (at T1). An adapted version of the Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale [54] was used. The scale consists of 23 questions in 7 domains: playability, narratives, enjoyment, personal gratification, creative freedom, audio aesthetics, and visual aesthetics. We asked participants to specify their agreement level using a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (totally disagree) to 5 (totally agree). A score was calculated for each domain.

    Data Analysis

    Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 26; IBM Corp). The statistical significance for all analyses was P<.05. Variables are reported as means (with standard deviations) or medians (with interquartile ranges). The normality distribution of interval variables was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For metric data, differences between pretest and posttest were analyzed using 1-tailed paired t tests. For nonmetric data, the differences between pretest and posttest were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank sum tests. Differences between groups were analyzed using 1-tailed independent t tests. The relationships between subscale items were tested using Cronbach α. No power estimation was performed since this was a pilot study.


    Participant Characteristics

    Of 40 children approached for the trial, 27 (68%) children agreed to participate (age: mean 9.9 years, SD 0.9 years; girls: 16/27, 59%; boys: 11/27, 41%). The control group had 12 participants (age: mean 9.8 years, SD 0.62; girls: 7/12, 58%; boys: 4/12, 33%), and the intervention group had 15 participants (age: mean 9.9 years, SD 0.94; girls: 9/15, 60%; boys: 6/15, 40%). We created a game environment where children felt comfortable during game sessions; however, 1 child missed 1 session, and 6 children missed 2 sessions. Participants in the intervention group played an average of 3.1 hours.

    Primary Outcome: Healthy Behaviors Knowledge

    Knowledge of intervention group participants increased significantly from T0 to T1 for physical activity (t14=2.01, P=.03), healthy eating (t14=3.14, P=.003), and socioemotional wellness (t14=2.75, P=.008). There were no significant changes in the knowledge of the control group participants from T0 to T1 for physical activity (t11=0.29, P=.39), healthy eating (t11=–0.64, P=.27), and socioemotional wellness (t11=0.01, P=.50). At T1, between-group differences were statistically significant for physical activity (t25=1.98, P=.03), healthy eating (t25=1.85, P=.04), and socioemotional wellness (t25=1.97, P=.03); the intervention group scored higher than the control group for all 3 (Table 1).

    Table 1. Outcomes of healthy behaviors knowledge and intention to conduct healthy behaviors.
    MeasureItems, nControl groupIntervention groupBetween-group postintervention comparison



    		Baseline (T0), mean (SD)Postintervention (T1), mean (SD)P
    value    		Baseline (T0), mean (SD)Postintervention (T1), mean (SD)P
    value    		P
    value
    Knowledge

    		Physical activity134 (1.5)4.08 (1.6).394.5 (2)5.7 (2.4).03.03

    		Healthy eating6438.9 (11.9)38.3 (12.9).2740 (9.2)45.5 (7.1).003.04

    		Socioemotional wellness51.83 (1.2)1.83 (1.2).502.1 (1.2)2.9 (1.4).008.03
    Intention to conduct healthy behaviors

    		Physical activity42.4 (1.4)2.3 (1.4).222.13 (1.6)3.07 (0.8).006.03

    		Healthy eating2413.9 (4.3)14.2 (3.5).3513.5 (3.5)16.3 (2.2).002.03

    		Socioemotional wellness54.4 (1.2)4.5 (0.8).414.6 (0.5)4.9 (0.25).009.01

    Secondary Outcomes

    Intention to Conduct Healthy Behaviors

    Intention to perform healthy behaviors in the intervention group increased from T0 to T1 for physical activity (t14=2.82, P=.006), healthy eating (t14=3.44, P=.002), and socioemotional wellness (t14=2.65, P=.009). There were no significant differences in intention to conduct healthy lifestyle behaviors for control group participants for physical activity (t11=–0.80, P=.22), healthy eating (t11=0.40, P=.40), and socioemotional wellness (t11=0.23, P=.41). In addition, differences in T1 intention scores between the intervention group and control group were statistically significant for physical activity (t25=1.95, P=.03), healthy eating (t25=1.91, P=.03), and socioemotional wellness (t25=2.43, P=.01); the intervention group scored higher than the control group for all 3 (Table 1).

    Food Frequency Intake

    Participants in the intervention group reported reduced consumption frequency of ham, sausage, soft drinks, wheat burritos, hamburgers, breaded chicken, sopes, tamales, salt peanuts, sweet cookies, potatoes chips, cake, and sweet soft cakes. Participants in the control group indicated reduced self-reported frequency intake of 5 healthy foods (cantaloupe, carrot, fish soup, fish ceviche, and fresh fruit juice) and 1 unhealthy food (bottled fruit juice) (Table 2).

    Table 2. Outcomes of food frequency intake.


    		ClassificationBaseline (T0) scorea, median (IQR)Postintervention (T1) scorea, median (IQR)P value
    Intervention group




    		HamUnhealthy2 (1.3)1 (2).02

    		SausageUnhealthy2 (1.3)1 (2).02

    		Soft drinksUnhealthy1 (2)1 (2).02

    		Wheat burritosUnhealthy1 (2)0 (1).03

    		HamburgersUnhealthy1 (1)1 (1).01

    		Breaded chickenUnhealthy0 (1)0 (0).048

    		SopesUnhealthy2 (1.3)0 (1).02

    		TamalesUnhealthy1 (1)0 (1).02

    		Salt peanutsUnhealthy1 (1.3)0 (1).04

    		Sweet cookiesUnhealthy1 (1.3)0 (1.25).01

    		Potato chipsUnhealthy1 (1)0 (1).03

    		CakeUnhealthy1 (1.3)0 (1).04

    		Sweet soft cakesUnhealthy1 (0.3)0 (1).02
    Control group

    		CantaloupeHealthy1 (1.25)0 (1).047

    		CarrotHealthy1 (2)0 (1).02

    		Fish soupHealthy0.5 (2)0 (0).03

    		Fish cevicheHealthy2 (1.15)0.5 (1).04

    		Fresh fruit juiceHealthy1.5 (2.25)0 (1).02

    		Bottle fruit juiceUnhealthy1.5 (1.25)0.5 (1).04

    a0 indicated never, 1 indicated one to three times per month, 2 indicated once per week, 3 indicated two to four times per week, 4 indicated five to six times per week, 5 indicated daily, and 6 indicated two or more times per day.

    Player Video Game Satisfaction

    Satisfaction ratings were significantly higher than the neutral value for all domains: playability (t14=7.04, P<.001), narrative (t14=4.00, P<.001), enjoyment (t14=4.77, P<.001), creative freedom (t14=7.69, P<.001), audio aesthetics (t14=4.33, P<.001), personal gratification (t14=5.99, P<.001), and visual aesthetics (t14=5.12, P<.001). Most participants agreed that the game was easy to learn to play and use (14/14, 100%), has a clear history (12/15, 80%), is fun and original (11/15, 73%), has good music (12/15, 80%), has good graphics (12/15, 80%), and made them feel successful when they overcame the game's challenges (13/15, 87%). In addition, most participants wanted to play HelperFriend again (12/15, 80%). All measures obtained Cronbach α values ≥.73, except for narrative (Cronbach α=.56) (Table 3).

    Table 3. Player satisfaction questionnaire results.
    MeasureItems, nCronbach α (n=15)Mean (SD)Neutral valueP valueLowerUpper
    Playability9.764 (0.5)3<.0012.85
    Narrative2.563.9 (0.9)3<.0011.55
    Enjoyment3.734 (0.8)3<.0012.75
    Creative freedom2.734.1 (0.6)3<.00135
    Audio aesthetics3.904.1 (1)3<.0011.75
    Personal gratification4.754.2 (0.7)3<.0012.55
    Visual aesthetics2.854 (0.8)3<.0012.55

    Principal Findings

    Knowledge

    Children in the intervention group significantly improved their knowledge about physical activity (t14=2.01, P=.03), healthy eating (t14=3.14, P=.003), and socioemotional wellness (t14=2.75, P=.008) after gameplay; thus, the first hypothesis was verified. Previous studies have also shown that video games for health can help children improve their understanding of physical activity [55] and healthy eating [35,37-39,41,55]. Other than in a recent study [42], in which stress and stress-coping strategies were included, emotional and social issues related to adopting healthy lifestyle behaviors have not been previously taken into account in interventions with serious games that have targeted healthy eating. We also identified that it is possible to teach this type of issue with serious games. Our results support those of a previous study [55], showing that it is feasible to improve physical activity and healthy eating knowledge together. These promising results may be explained by the experiential and vicarious learning environment of the game in which players observe the behavior of others [45] and engage in direct experiences through doing, reflecting, concluding, and trying the learned experience [44]. Conversely, because improving health knowledge through serious games does not necessarily result in behavioral change [28], we also plan to adjust content and learning strategies in a future version.

    Intention to Conduct Healthy Behaviors

    Second, we hypothesized that the intention to conduct physical activity, healthy eating, and healthy socioemotional behaviors would be higher after the intervention; we also verified this hypothesis. A previous study [40] also showed that video games for health could help children improve dietary and exercise attitudes, but we did not identify any studies on intention to conduct healthy socioemotional behaviors. Improved intention to engage in healthy behaviors may be as a result of integrating multiple behavior change techniques—a cornerstone for efficacy in behavior change interventions [56]. Because a change in intention leads to a small to medium change in behavior [57], these findings help assess the potential impact of video games on children's lifestyle behaviors. The smallest increase in intention was for socioemotional wellness, possibly because the intervention group already scored higher at baseline, which may be associated with the fact that the questionnaire contained simple questions that make it easy to obtain a high score.

    Food Frequency Intake

    The third hypothesis stated that, after the intervention, children's diets would improve. A lower intake frequency was found for 13 unhealthy foods (such as soft drinks, hamburgers, sweet cookies, potatoes chips, and sweet soft cakes). These changes are relevant because Mexican children commonly consume these foods in schools and at home [58] and changes in children's diets and eating habits can promote changes in the whole family [59]. Our findings confirm that games to improve healthy food consumption are beneficial, which has been demonstrated in some earlier studies (eg, [36,39,41]), but not others (eg, [42]). Unlike some previous studies (eg, [35,39]), we only achieved a reduction in the consumption of unhealthy foods. One possible explanation is that providing information or visual images of foods alone is insufficient to increase children's preferences for the intake of healthy foods [60,61]. Instead, repeated exposure to healthy foods is more effective for improving children's preferences [61]—even more so than strategies based on rewards [62]. A future version of HelperFriend should include behavior change techniques (eg, self-monitoring, setting and examining goals, and action planning) that directly support and encourage healthy food intake. Surprisingly, the participants in the control group indicated reduced intake of 5 healthy foods (cantaloupe, carrot, fish soup, fish ceviche, fresh fruit juice) and 1 unhealthy food (bottled fruit juice); however, we did not collect any other information from the control group that could facilitate the interpretation of this result.

    Game Acceptance and Satisfaction

    The fourth hypothesis was also verified; children felt good during gameplay, and game acceptance was high. HelperFriend obtained very positive results on personal gratification, playability, creative freedom, enjoyment, narrative, and visual and audio aesthetics—factors which have been shown to be correlated with and predictors of learning [63]. However, for four specific aspects, there is room for improvement: (1) improving the fit of the difficulty curve of the game to the capacities of the children, (2) simplifying the game flow to foster player autonomy, (3) increasing socioemotional elements, and (4) implementing a daily activity tracking system in the game to make it easier for children to understand the daily activities they have to carry out to have healthy lifestyles. These characteristics could be essential aspects that positively influence the general perception, acceptability, and effectiveness of the game.

    Limitations

    First, the results should be cautiously interpreted because a small group of children participated in the study. However, given that we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of HelperFriend, our findings can offer valuable information in designing health games for children to improve lifestyle behaviors and that consider socioemotional issues. Second, medium- and long-term effects were not examined. Medium- and long-term studies could provide interesting findings since video games, especially those involving physical activity, can become boring quickly [64]. Third, we developed the intention questionnaire because we did not find any available for young children; however, a detailed review would be necessary prior to its use in a full randomized controlled trial. Finally, the frequency of food intake was self-reported. The results could be limited by the known constraints of food frequency questionnaires, such as trouble recalling experiences and over- or understatement of food intake [65]. Nevertheless, food frequency questionnaires are the most frequently used approach because they are easy to use, reliable, and valid. In addition, there is previous evidence that children's self-reported food intake is more accurate than that reported by parents [66].

    We plan to conduct a randomized controlled clinical trial with sample size calculation to address some of these limitations. Moreover, we plan to extend the exposure period and conduct repeated exposure to account for medium- and long-term effects. Finally, we plan to improve the intention questionnaire and include another behavioral test (eg, physical activity).

    Conclusions

    HelperFriend, a vicarious experiential health game for promoting physical activity, healthy eating, and socioemotional wellness, appears to be feasible and acceptable for young children. Preliminary results suggest that this game improves knowledge about and the intention to conduct healthy lifestyle behaviors and improves dietary intake in children. In future versions of HelperFriend, some game elements should be improved and other behavior change techniques that promote children's intake of healthy foods should be integrated. Given that this was a pilot study with a limited sample size, a well-powered randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the efficacy of HelperFriend.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (grant PDCPN-2015-824). We are thankful to the manager of Colegio Real de San Juan for enabling the evaluation of HelperFriend in their institution and to all educators, scholars, and parents who participated in this study. Finally, we are thankful to Amara Janeth Aguilar-Partida and Mitzi Josue Martínez Rosas, who elaborated the graphical design of HelperFriend.

    Authors' Contributions

    IEEC designed the game and experiment, performed all statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. EEPB developed the game and participated in running the experiment. MHA conducted the experiment and performed data collection and processing. EEDP and MENJ designed the game also provided the game's psychological and nutritional foundations. JMM and HPE analyzed and interpreted data and drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Video of the game.

    MP4 File (MP4 Video), 135568 KB
    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Intention to conduct healthy behaviors questionnaire.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 900 KB
    1. Chung A, Peeters A, Gearon E, Backholer K. Contribution of discretionary food and drink consumption to socio-economic inequalities in children's weight: prospective study of Australian children. Int J Epidemiol 2018 Jun 01;47(3):820-828. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Cureau FV, Sparrenberger K, Bloch KV, Ekelund U, Schaan BD. Associations of multiple unhealthy lifestyle behaviors with overweight/obesity and abdominal obesity among Brazilian adolescents: a country-wide survey. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2018 Jul;28(7):765-774. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Kelsey MM, Zaepfel A, Bjornstad P, Nadeau KJ. Age-related consequences of childhood obesity. Gerontology 2014;60(3):222-228. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Tamanal JM, Kim CH. Promoting healthy lifestyle in high school students: determination of the lifestyle status through the healthy lifestyle screen (HLS) assessment. J Lifestyle Med 2020 Jan 31;10(1):30-43. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Birch L, Savage JS, Ventura A. Influences on the development of children's eating behaviours: from infancy to adolescence. Can J Diet Pract Res 2007;68(1):s1-s56 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
    6. Issanchou S, Habeat consortium. Determining factors and critical periods in the formation of eating habits: results from the Habeat project. Ann Nutr Metab 2017;70(3):251-256 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-043-SSA2-2012, Servicios básicos de salud. Promoción y educación para la salud en materia alimentaria. Diario Oficial de la Federeación. 2013 Jan 22.   URL: http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5285372&fecha=22/01/2013 [accessed 2018-04-20]
    8. Nishtar S, Gluckman P, Armstrong T. Ending childhood obesity: a time for action. Lancet 2016 Mar 27;387(10021):825-827. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Recomendaciones mundiales sobre actividad física para la salud. Organización Mundial de la Salud. 2010.   URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44441/9789243599977_spa.pdf [accessed 2018-03-11]
    10. Brown T, Moore TH, Hooper L, Gao Y, Zayegh A, Ijaz S, et al. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019 Jul 23;7:CD001871 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Westenhoefer J. Establishing dietary habits during childhood for long-term weight control. Ann Nutr Metab 2002;46 Suppl 1:18-23 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Hesketh K, Waters E, Green J, Salmon L, Williams J. Healthy eating, activity and obesity prevention: a qualitative study of parent and child perceptions in Australia. Health Promot Int 2005 Mar;20(1):19-26. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Lobstein T, Jackson-Leach R, Moodie ML, Hall KD, Gortmaker SL, Swinburn BA, et al. Child and adolescent obesity: part of a bigger picture. Lancet 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2510-2520 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Gaona-Pineda EB, Martínez-Tapia B, Arango-Angarita A, Valenzuela-Bravo D, Gómez-Acosta LM, Shamah-Levy T, et al. [Food groups consumption and sociodemographic characteristics in Mexican population]. Salud Publica Mex 2018;60(3):272-282. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Shamah-Levy T, Vielma-Orozco E, Heredia-Hernández O, Romero-Martínez M, Mojica-Cuevas J, Cuevas-Nasu L, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2018-19: Resultados Nacionales. In: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 2020.
    16. Aparicio E, Canals J, Arija V, De Henauw S, Michels N. The role of emotion regulation in childhood obesity: implications for prevention and treatment. Nutr Res Rev 2016 Jun;29(1):17-29. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Salvy S, de LHK, Bowker JC, Hermans RCJ. Influence of peers and friends on children's and adolescents' eating and activity behaviors. Physiol Behav 2012 Jun 06;106(3):369-378 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Elias JM, Zins JE, Weissberg RP, Frey KS, Greenberg MT, Haynes NM, et al. Promoting Social and Emotional Learning: Guidelines for Educators. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD; 1997.
    19. Zins JE, Elias MJ. Social and emotional learning: promoting the development of all students. J Educ Psychol Consult 2007 Jul 30;17(2-3):233-255. [CrossRef]
    20. Wattanasoontorn V, Boada I, García R, Sbert M. Serious games for health. Entertain Comput 2013 Dec;4(4):231-247. [CrossRef]
    21. Baranowski T, Blumberg F, Buday R, DeSmet A, Fiellin LE, Green CS, et al. Games for health for children-current status and needed research. Games Health J 2016 Mar;5(1):1-12 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Ricciardi F, De Paolis LT. A comprehensive review of serious games in health professions. Int J Comput Games Technol 2014 Aug;2014(787968):1-11. [CrossRef]
    23. Primack BA, Carroll MV, McNamara M, Klem ML, King B, Rich M, et al. Role of video games in improving health-related outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2012 Jun;42(6):630-638 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Holzmann SL, Dischl F, Schäfer H, Groh G, Hauner H, Holzapfel C. Digital gaming for nutritional education: a survey on preferences, motives, and needs of children and adolescents. JMIR Form Res 2019 Mar 13;3(1):e10284 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Liu W, Wu X, Huang K, Yan S, Ma L, Cao H, et al. Early childhood screen time as a predictor of emotional and behavioral problems in children at 4 years: a birth cohort study in China. Environ Health Prev Med 2021 Jan 07;26(1):3 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Lissak G. Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: literature review and case study. Environ Res 2018 Jul;164:149-157. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Rey-López JP, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Biosca M, Moreno LA. Sedentary behaviour and obesity development in children and adolescents. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2008 Mar;18(3):242-251. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Mack I, Bayer C, Schäffeler N, Reiband N, Brölz E, Zurstiege G, et al. Chances and limitations of video games in the fight against childhood obesity-a systematic review. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2017 Jul;25(4):237-267. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Ameryoun A, Sanaeinasab H, Saffari M, Koenig HG. Impact of game-based health promotion programs on body mass index in overweight/obese children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Child Obes 2018;14(2):67-80. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Holtz BE, Murray K, Park T. Serious games for children with chronic diseases: a systematic review. Games Health J 2018 Oct;7(5):291-301. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Chow CY, Riantiningtyas RR, Kanstrup MB, Papavasileiou M, Liem GD, Olsen A. Can games change children’s eating behaviour? a review of gamification and serious games. Food Qual Prefer 2020 Mar;80:103823. [CrossRef]
    32. Dias JD, Domingues AN, Tibes CM, Zem-Mascarenhas SH, Fonseca LMM. Serious games as an educational strategy to control childhood obesity: a systematic literature review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2018 Sep 03;26:e3036 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Guy S, Ratzki-Leewing A, Gwadry-Sridhar F. Moving beyond the stigma: systematic review of video games and their potential to combat obesity. Int J Hypertens 2011;2011:179124 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Villani D, Carissoli C, Triberti S, Marchetti A, Gilli G, Riva G. Videogames for emotion regulation: a systematic review. Games Health J 2018 Apr;7(2):85-99. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Baranowski T, Baranowski J, Thompson D, Buday R, Jago R, Griffith MJ, et al. Video game play, child diet, and physical activity behavior change a randomized clinical trial. Am J Prev Med 2011 Jan;40(1):33-38 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Majumdar D, Koch PA, Lee H, Contento IR, Islas-Ramos ADL, Fu D. "Creature-101": a serious game to promote energy balance-related behaviors among middle school adolescents. Games Health J 2013 Oct;2(5):280-290 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Johnson-Glenberg MC, Hekler EB. "Alien Health Game": an embodied exergame to instruct in nutrition and MyPlate. Games Health J 2013 Dec;2(6):354-361. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Hermans RCJ, van den Broek N, Nederkoorn C, Otten R, Ruiter ELM, Johnson-Glenberg MC. Feed the Alien! the effects of a nutrition instruction game on children's nutritional knowledge and food intake. Games Health J 2018 Jun;7(3):164-174. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Marchetti D, Fraticelli F, Polcini F, Lato R, Pintaudi B, Nicolucci A, et al. Preventing adolescents' diabesity: design, development, and first evaluation of "Gustavo in Gnam's Planet". Games Health J 2015 Oct;4(5):344-351 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Sharma SV, Shegog R, Chow J, Finley C, Pomeroy M, Smith C, et al. Effects of the Quest to Lava Mountain computer game on dietary and physical activity behaviors of elementary school children: a pilot group-randomized controlled trial. J Acad Nutr Diet 2015 Aug;115(8):1260-1271. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Espinosa-Curiel IE, Pozas-Bogarin EE, Lozano-Salas JL, Martínez-Miranda J, Delgado-Pérez EE, Estrada-Zamarron LS. Nutritional education and promotion of healthy eating behaviors among Mexican children through video games: design and pilot test of FoodRateMaster. JMIR Serious Games 2020 Apr 13;8(2):e16431 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Mack I, Reiband N, Etges C, Eichhorn S, Schaeffeler N, Zurstiege G, et al. The Kids Obesity Prevention Program: cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate a serious game for the prevention and treatment of childhood obesity. J Med Internet Res 2020 Apr 24;22(4):e15725 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Torrente J, Borro-Escribano B, Freire M, del Blanco A, Marchiori EJ, Martinez-Ortiz I, et al. Development of game-like simulations for procedural knowledge in healthcare education. IEEE Trans Learning Technol 2014 Jan;7(1):69-82. [CrossRef]
    44. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. New Jersey, USA: Pearson Education; 2015.
    45. Lu AS, Baranowski T, Thompson D, Buday R. Story immersion of videogames for youth health promotion: a review of literature. Games Health J 2012 Jun;1(3):199-204 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Danielsson P, Kowalski J, Ekblom Ö, Marcus C. Response of severely obese children and adolescents to behavioral treatment. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012 Dec;166(12):1103-1108. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Kelishadi R, Azizi-Soleiman F. Controlling childhood obesity: a systematic review on strategies and challenges. J Res Med Sci 2014 Oct;19(10):993-1008. [Medline]
    49. Canavera M, Sharma M, Murnan J. Development and pilot testing a social cognitive theory-based intervention to prevent childhood obesity among elementary students in rural Kentucky. Int Q Community Health Educ 2008;29(1):57-70. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Sharma M. Dietary education in school-based childhood obesity prevention programs. Adv Nutr 2011 Mar;2(2):207S-216S [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Kim SY, Prestopnik N, Biocca FA. Body in the interactive game: how interface embodiment affects physical activity and health behavior change. Comput Hum Behav 2014 Jul;36:376-384. [CrossRef]
    52. Kuźbicka K, Rachoń D. Bad eating habits as the main cause of obesity among children. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2013;19(3):106-110. [Medline]
    53. Nissinen K, Korkalo L, Vepsäläinen H, Mäkiranta P, Koivusilta L, Roos E, et al. Accuracy in the estimation of children's food portion sizes against a food picture book by parents and early educators. J Nutr Sci 2018;7:e35 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Phan MH, Keebler JR, Chaparro BS. The development and validation of the game user experience satisfaction scale (GUESS). Hum Factors 2016 Dec;58(8):1217-1247. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    55. Holzmann SL, Schäfer H, Groh G, Plecher DA, Klinker G, Schauberger G, et al. Short-term effects of the serious game "Fit, Food, Fun" on nutritional knowledge: a pilot study among children and adolescents. Nutrients 2019 Aug 30;11(9):2031 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Michie S, West R, Sheals K, Godinho CA. Evaluating the effectiveness of behavior change techniques in health-related behavior: a scoping review of methods used. Transl Behav Med 2018 Mar 01;8(2):212-224 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Webb TL, Sheeran P. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? a meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull 2006 Mar;132(2):249-268. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. López-Olmedo N, Carriquiry AL, Rodríguez-Ramírez S, Ramírez-Silva I, Espinosa-Montero J, Hernández-Barrera L, et al. Usual intake of added sugars and saturated fats is high while dietary fiber is low in the Mexican population. J Nutr 2016 Sep;146(9):1856S-1865S. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Basdevant A, Boute D, Borys JM. Who should be educated? education strategies: could children educate their parents? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999 May;23 Suppl 4:S10-2-discussion S12-3. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Coulthard H, Ahmed S. Non taste exposure techniques to increase fruit and vegetable acceptance in children: effects of task and stimulus type. Food Quality and Preference 2017 Oct;61:50-54. [CrossRef]
    61. Johnson SL. Developmental and environmental influences on young children's vegetable preferences and consumption. Adv Nutr 2016 Jan;7(1):220S-231S [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    62. Wardle J, Herrera M, Cooke L, Gibson EL. Modifying children's food preferences: the effects of exposure and reward on acceptance of an unfamiliar vegetable. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003 Feb;57(2):341-348. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    63. Espinosa-Curiel IE, Pozas-Bogarin EE, Martínez-Miranda J, Pérez-Espinosa H. Relationship between children's enjoyment, user experience satisfaction, and learning in a serious video game for nutrition education: empirical pilot study. JMIR Serious Games 2020 Sep 17;8(3):e21813 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    64. Simons M, de Vet E, Hoornstra S, Brug J, Seidell J, Chinapaw M. Adolescents' views on active and non-active videogames: a focus group study. Games Health J 2012 Jun;1(3):211-218. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    65. Thompson FE, Subar AF, Coulston AM, Boushey CJ, Ferruzzi MG, Delahanty LM. Dietary assessment methodology. In: Coulston AM, Boushey CJ, Ferruzzi MG, Delahanty LM, editors. Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease (Fourth Edition). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press; 2017:5-48.
    66. Kolodziejczyk JK, Merchant G, Norman GJ. Reliability and validity of child/adolescent food frequency questionnaires that assess foods and/or food groups. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012 Jul;55(1):4-13. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    Edited by N Zary; submitted 06.09.21; peer-reviewed by I Mack; comments to author 29.09.21; revised version received 14.12.21; accepted 07.04.22; published 06.05.22

    Copyright

    ©Ismael Edrein Espinosa-Curiel, Edgar Efrén Pozas-Bogarin, Maryleidi Hernández-Arvizu, Maria Elena Navarro-Jiménez, Edwin Emeth Delgado-Pérez, Juan Martínez-Miranda, Humberto Pérez-Espinosa. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (https://games.jmir.org), 06.05.2022.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Serious Games, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://games.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.