Review
Abstract
Background: Serious games (SGs) are nonpharmacological interventions that are widely applied among older adults. To date, no evidence has been published regarding the effect of digital SGs on cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, or depression in older adults with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of SGs on older adults with AD and MCI by summarizing and pooling the results of previous studies.
Methods: This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of digital SGs in improving cognitive ability, enhancing daily behavioral capacity, and alleviating depression in older adults with AD and MCI. We searched the following databases up to December 31, 2023, to identify relevant high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Stata 15.1 and Review Manager 5.3 were used to screen the 14 studies, extract data, code the data, and perform meta-analysis. Mean differences and standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs were used to calculate continuous variables. The Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Eligibility criteria were developed in accordance with the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Design framework: (1) population (older adults with AD and MCI), (2) intervention (digital SG intervention), (3) comparison (digital SG intervention vs routine health care), (4) outcomes (cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression), and (5) study or research design (RCT). Sensitivity analysis was performed, and a funnel plot was constructed.
Results: From January 2017 to December 2023, we enrolled 714 individuals across 14 RCTs, with 374 (52.4%) in the severe game group using digital SGs and 340 (47.6%) in the control group using traditional methods. The results of our meta-analysis indicated that using digital SGs in older adults with AD and MCI is more effective than traditional training methods in several key areas. Specifically, digital SG therapy significantly increased cognitive ability, as found in the Mini-Mental State Examination (SMD 2.11, 95% CI 1.42-2.80; P<.001) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD 2.75, 95% CI 1.98-3.51; P<.001), significantly increased daily behavioral capacity (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.06-0.99; P=.03), and significantly reduced depression (SMD –2.08, 95% CI –2.94 to –1.22; P<.001) in older adults with AD and MCI. No publication bias was detected based on the results of Begg and Egger tests.
Conclusions: Digital SGs offer a viable and effective nonpharmacological approach for older adults with AD and MCI, yielding better results compared to traditional formats. However, caution is warranted in interpreting these findings due to limited RCTs, small sample sizes, and low-quality meta-analyzed evidence.
Trial Registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRDCRD42023486090; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=486090
doi:10.2196/55785
Keywords
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are among the most common diseases affecting older adults. As the worldwide population is aging, the incidence of AD and MCI is gradually increasing, leading to major challenges for older adults. AD and MCI are being increasingly researched worldwide because of their adverse effects on cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression among older adults. Currently, more than 55 million people worldwide have dementia [
]. Dementia is a progressive degenerative disease of the central nervous system that metastasizes through different clinical stages [ ] and is characterized by abnormal behavior, declining cognitive function, and declining daily living ability [ ]. Dementia affects multiple aspects of cognitive function, including complex attention, memory and learning, perceptual-motor skills, social cognition, and language [ ]. AD is the most common form of dementia and may account for 60%-70% (38.77 million) of the 55 million cases of dementia [ ]. MCI is an intermediate stage between dementia and normal aging [ ]; clinicians and researchers consider the stage of MCI to be a “window” for potentially delaying the progression into dementia [ ]. Moreover, the number of MCI cases among individuals above the age of 60 years is 5.82 million [ ]. In 2019, the worldwide economic cost of dementia amounted to US $1.3 trillion, of which approximately 50% (US $0.65 trillion) involved care provided by informal caregivers (eg, family members and close friends), who provided an average of 5 hours of care and supervision per day [ ]. China has the largest number of patients with dementia worldwide, which leads to a huge burden on the health care and public system [ ]. Approximately 13.75 million (25%) of 55 million people with dementia are Chinese [ ], and thus, this country ranks first in the world. The results of a recent national cross-sectional study showed that there are 16.07 million people aged 60 years and over in China who have dementia; 9.83 million of these individuals have AD [ ]. Presently, there is no known cure for dementia; health care and medication can only slow the disease progression [ ].When older people get MCI and AD, they experience a range of painful experiences related to this particular stage of life, such as depression [
, ], decreased cognitive ability [ , ], and decreased daily living ability [ , ]. Sudden illness can cause patients to experience both physical and psychological pain [ ]. A significant proportion of the population with MCI and AD reports higher levels of perceived [ ]. Depression is characterized by threats that exceed an individual’s coping abilities, thus resulting in a feeling of being overwhelmed [ ]. A growing body of evidence suggests that several important dimensions of life are frequently sacrificed when individuals get MCI and AD, and cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity and depression are often neglected. Therefore, digital serious games (SGs) for older adults with MCI and AD may be crucial in the early intervention and prevention of these mental and physical disorders [ ]. According to a previous report, even in worse cases, mental and physical disorders are risk factors for MCI and AD [ ]. Patients with MCI and AD are completely dependent on caregivers, have markedly impaired memory function, are unable to take care of themselves in daily life, exhibit incontinence, and may even be completely unable to speak and have hemiplegia [ ]. MCI and AD even cause an increase in the risk of mortality [ ], which significantly damages people’s health and imposes a growing burden on individuals and the entire society. Therefore, it is highly emergent to develop nondrug therapies and use them in the field of social work for older adults. This may slow the progression of cognitive disability in individuals with MCI and AD to combat personal and socioeconomic problems, to address the alarming increase in the incidences of MCI and dementia worldwide, and to overcome the lack of effective drug treatments for these diseases.There are many therapeutic methods for treating MCI and AD in older adults. Game therapy has been recommended as a nonpharmacological treatment method due to its limited side effects. According to recent meta-analyses [
- ], game therapy could increase cognitive ability [ ] and daily performance ability [ , ] and alleviate depression [ , ] in older adults with MCI and AD. Game therapy refers to an intervention method in which games are used as a therapeutic medium. This therapy originated from a child psychoanalysis program developed by the famous psychologist Sigmund Freud. He observed that there is a relationship between early childhood development and children’s games. In the discussion of children’s control of emotions through games, Freud presented the rationale for game therapy [ ]. After nearly a century of clinical development, the therapeutic function of games has been proven in practice [ , ]. SGs may take many forms, depending on their treatment, such as (1) cognitive training games, which are mainly used to improve or maintain users’ cognitive abilities (eg, memory, executive function, and memory) [ - ]; (2) sports games or video games, in which part of the game needs to include exercise [ , ]; (3) biofeedback games, which use electronic sensors connected to the participant’s body to receive information about their physical status (eg, an electrocardiograph sensor), with the aim of adjusting some bodily functions (eg, heart rate) [ - ]; and (4) cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)–based games that provide computerized computer-based training. Due to the popularity of smart devices, handheld computers, personal computers, video game consoles, tablets, and smartphones, there is a wide variety of SGs [ , ]. Digital SGs, as defined in this paper, are SGs played through digital media. Digitally designed games help promote mental health [ ], emotions [ ], well-being [ ], social function [ ], and cognitive flexibility [ ] compared to traditional cognitive training and exercise [ ].With respect to the development of game therapy theory, many studies have shown that game therapy is applicable for older adults [
]. The introduction of virtual reality technology has recently provided a new way to implement environmental enrichment in the context of clinical practice, which improves the physical health of patients with MCI and AD [ ], treats chronic disease [ ], increases cognitive ability [ ] and daily behavioral capacity [ , ], alleviates depression [ ], and increases self-esteem [ ] and cohesion [ ] by combining virtual immersion with cognitive stimulation. In conclusion, SG therapy is regarded as a promising treatment strategy for older adults with dementia and MCI in terms of increasing cognitive ability, improving daily behavioral capacity, and alleviating mental health issues. Game therapy is therefore increasingly used in gerontology, with the goal of providing psychosocial stabilization and support.There are a few research gaps. First, there are inconsistent clinical results regarding the effects of SG therapy on cognitive performance, daily performance, and depression. According to Saragih et al [
] and Ning et al [ ], SGs have been shown to improve cognitive function. However, Huang et al [ ] and Kleschnitzki et al [ ] reported that no significant changes are found in cognitive function or global status after virtual reality intervention. Wang et al [ ] discovered that SGs have a positive impact on executive function. However, Abd-Alrazaq et al [ ] found that there is no difference between adaptive SGs and nonadaptive SGs in improving executive function, although daily behavioral capacity is particularly related to executive function, such as scheduling appointments, making monthly payments, managing the household economy, shopping, or taking the bus. This means the effect of SGs in improving daily behavioral capacity is yet to be explored. Bai et al [ ] compared SGs with intervention-free practices and found that game-based interventions lead to clinically and statistically significant improvements in depression severity. Bojan et al [ ] discovered that SGs can cause a significant increase in positive emotions and a decrease in negative emotions [ , ]. However, according to Fitzgerald et al [ ], whether SGs can improve depression in some cases is worth exploring. Therefore, there are inconsistent clinical results regarding the effects of SG therapy on cognitive performance, daily performance, and depression. A more comprehensive review is needed to systematically evaluate the effects of SGs on the physical and mental health of older adults with AD and MCI. Second, the previous literature only focused on SGs for a type of disease for older adults. Manca et al [ ] observed the positive impact of SGs with humanoid robots on older adults with MCI. Pacheco et al [ ] found that exergames improve balance and mobility in older adults to keep performing balance exercises. Yu and Chan [ ] discovered video game training can effectively improve the cognition of older adults. This study investigated the effects of SGs on the cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression of older adults with MCI and AD simultaneously. Third, it is important to investigate not only the effects of SGs but also the variables that may influence their effectiveness, including the duration of treatment and the target population. In this research, we used weeks and continental plates (within and outside Europe) to divide the subgroup analysis, which was not available in previous studies. In view of this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the effect of digital SGs on cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression of older adults (≥60 years old) with MCI and AD.Methods
Data Sources and Search Strategy
This review was conducted in strict accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines [
]; also see and [ ]. We registered the study in PROSPERO (Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42023486090). We used the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Design) framework [ ] to structure study inclusion and exclusion criteria ( ). Our population of interest had at least 1 indicator indicating cognitive ability, behavioral ability, or emotion-related ability, and their age was ≥60 years. We sought studies describing interventions with digital SGs implemented among older adults with cognitive impairment in an experimental group (severe game group [SGG]), including exergames or video games, cognitive training games, computerized CBT-based games, and biofeedback games. There were no restrictions regarding the time of intervention. For comparison, we had a control group (CG) that received a different intervention, such as routine health care, traditional Tai Chi, or music. Our outcomes of interest included cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression in older adults with cognitive impairment. We excluded studies that presented reviews, non–randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and papers for which the full text was unavailable. All included studies were published in Chinese or English. Studies in which the results were interpreted from the perspective of older adults with cognitive impairment were deemed eligible.Element | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
Population |
| N/Aa |
Intervention |
| N/A |
Comparison |
| N/A |
Outcomes |
| N/A |
Study design |
|
|
Language |
|
|
aN/A: not applicable.
bSG: serious game.
cCBT: cognitive behavioral therapy.
dRCT: randomized controlled trial.
Search Strategy
The following databases were searched to identify the relevant literature: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. The following search terms were used for the search: (“Cognitive Ability” OR “Daily Behavior Ability” OR “Mental Health” OR “Depression”) AND (“Serious Games Based” OR “Serious Games” OR “Web-Based or Mobile”) AND (“Old Adults in Cognitive Impairment” OR “Old Adults” OR “Older People”) AND (“A pilot study” OR “Randomized Controlled Trial” OR “RCT”). Detailed search strategies for each database are given in
. The keywords were used to search for papers published from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023. The snowball method was adopted to search the reference lists of the included studies. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were manually searched to identify eligible papers. Unpublished academic literature was not considered eligible. The reference lists and relevant reviews were then screened to identify any pertinent studies. To identify additional relevant publications, we also retrieved gray literature [ ].Data Extraction
Four researchers (authors XZ, YT, YC, and ZZ) screened all the literature for inclusion. After removing duplicates using EndNote X9, all studies were independently screened based on titles and abstracts. Next, we carefully read the full texts of the remaining papers in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, data were extracted from the included studies. The co-first author (XZ) used the modified version of the data extraction table in the Systematic Review Manual of Cochrane Interventions to extract data. A modified version of the intervention description and replication was using following the template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) list and guidelines [
] to extract data of the intervention, design, and delivery features, as defined in the introduction. First, data were extracted by the co-first author (XZ). Next, the second author (ZZ) checked the accuracy of the process. Finally, the co-first author (YC), through thematic analysis [ ], extracted the following data from the list of 14 studies [ - ]:- Study characteristics: name of author, publication year, country, publication type, and study design
- Subject characteristics: sample size, participant mean age, participant age, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, participant health conditions, and population group
- Intervention details: setting, intervention type, delivery mode design (how), content (ie, procedures, materials, process, activities [what]), and delivery details (ie, intervention delivery format, intervention duration, session length, session frequency, intensity)
- Study quality: Jadad score
- Main outcomes: reported results, conclusion, measurement, and follow-up
Risk-of-Bias Assessment and Quality Assessment
Using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool [
], we independently assessed the risk of bias. Additionally, we assessed the quality of the 14 studies using the Jadad scale [ ]. The risk-of-bias tool assesses 7 domains: (1) generation of a random sequence, (2) allocation concealment, (3) subject and experimenter blinding, (4) outcome assessor blinding, (5) resulting data integration, (6) selective reports, and (7) other bias risk. Each study was categorized as having a low, high, or unclear risk of bias. We also performed Begg and Egger tests to evaluate the degree of publication bias [ ].Statistical Analysis
Stata 15.1 and Review Manager 5.3 were used to conduct data analysis. Forest plots were constructed to intuitively illustrate the results. In the included literature, the outcomes were measured as continuous variables, and the same indicator was assessed with different tools. These indicators were presented as standard mean differences (SMDs). α=.05 was considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics, which were classified as high (>75%), moderate (50%-75%), or low (<50%) [
]. In cases of high heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis was performed using the leave-1-out method to identify the sources of heterogeneity. In the analysis, numerous weeks were compared as subpoints to check the results. The Begg test [ ] and Egger test [ ] were used to assess publication bias. P<.05 indicated significant results. When a meta-analysis included at least 10 studies, publication bias was evaluated with a funnel plot [ , ]. In this study, 95% CI and the SMD were examined [ ]. Overall, P<.05 indicated statistically significant effects. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the country of intervention (outside Europe or not) and the length of intervention (weeks).Results
Study Selection
shows the study selection process. After searching 13 databases, 4260 relevant records were identified. For duplicate removal, we imported all the studies into EndNote X8 [ ]. After removing 1893 (44.4%) duplicates and eliminating 2352 (55.2%) papers via a strict screening process, 14 (0.3%) RCTs [ - ] from before December 2023 involving 714 participants were finally included. Studies were excluded because they did not report SDs [ , - ], were review papers [ , ], or were not within the scope of this meta-analysis [ - ]. All the included studies reported that digital SGs have a positive impact on cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression. The primary outcomes of interest were an increase in cognitive ability scores (assessed with the MMSE and the MoCA), an increase in daily behavioral capacity indicators (assessed with the Barthel Index, the Katz Index, the Lawton and Brody Index, the Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index [K-MBI], and the Activities of Daily Living [ADL] scale), and a reduction in depression (assessed with the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale [EADG], the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale [EDG-15], and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia [CSDD]).
![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/a57db9f42fcc4c22e12b9f79cbb0c11a.png)
Study Characteristics
and [ - ] show the overall characteristics of the included studies. All 14 studies were published before 2023. The sample sizes ranged from 17 to 112, and 714 older adults aged >60 years were enrolled in the included studies, including 340 (47.6%) subjects in the SGG and 374 (52.4%) subjects in the CG. All participants were older adults with cognitive impairment, but they had not been diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. All interventions were based on digital SGs, and their durations ranged from 4 weeks to 12 weeks. The interventions lasted from 45 minutes to 5 hours each week. Both group training and individual training methods were used [ - ]. All 14 studies [ - ] were subdivided into digital SG training methods (exergames or video games, cognitive training games, computerized CBT games, and biofeedback games).
Study | Location | Sample size: SGGb and CGc, n/N (%) | Age (years): SGG and CG, range (average)/mean (SD) | Disease | Time frame (weeks) | Reported results and conclusion |
Yang et al [ | ]Republic of Korea | SGG: 10/20 (50) CG: 10/20 (50) | SGG: 64-78 (71.1) CG: 61-78 (69.9) | Dementia | 4 | Result: Postintervention, the K-MMSEd score of the SGG was higher than that of the CG. Conclusion: Computer-based CBTe training might have beneficial effects on general cognitive function in the early stage of ADf. |
Kwan et al [ | ]Hong Kong, China | SGG: 16/33 (48) CG: 17/33 (52) | SGG: (average): 70.5 CG: (average): 71 | Dementia | 12 | Result: Postintervention, the MoCAg score of the SGG was higher than that of the CG. Conclusion: The mobile health (mHealth) intervention is feasible for implementation in older people with cognitive impairment and is effective at enhancing cognitive function. |
Lim et al [ | ]Republic of Korea | SGG: 12/24 (50) CG: 12/24 (50) | SGG: 69-81 (75.42) CG: 65-90 (73.33) | Dementia | 4 | Result: Postintervention, the K-MMSE, K-MoCAh, and DQoLi scores of the SGG were higher than those of the CG. Conclusion: The research group showed significant improvement in cognitive function after training. Family SGsj are believed to help improve cognitive function. |
Lee et al [ | ]Republic of Korea | SGG: 10/20 (50) CG: 10/20 (50) | SGG: 65-83 (74.5) CG: 65-82 (74) | MCI, AD, dementia | 3 | Result: Postintervention, the K-MMSE and ADLk scores of the SGG were higher than those of the CG. Conclusion: Through this preliminary study, we verified that the newly developed computerized cognitive rehabilitation program is effective in improving cognitive function. |
Yang [ | ]Fujian, China | SGG: 44/88 (50) CG: 44/88 (50) | SGG: 62-83 (71.89) CG: 61-82 (71.63) | Dementia | 12 | Result: Postintervention, the MMSEl and ADL scores of the SGG were higher than those of the CG. Conclusion: Interactive games can improve the cognitive function and daily living ability of patients with senile dementia. |
Van Santen et al [ | ]Netherlands | SGG: 73/112 (65) CG: 39/112 (35) | SGG: 73-85 (79) CG: 72-86 (79) | Dementia | 8 | Result: Postintervention, the MMSE score of the SGG was higher than that of the CG. Conclusion: Sports games can improve the cognitive function of patients with senile dementia. |
Zheng et al [ | ]Zhejiang, China | SGG: 18/38 (47) CG: 20/38 (53) | SGG: 75-87 (81.74) CG: 78-89 (84.26) | Dementia | 8 | Result: Postintervention, compared to the CG, the MMSE score of the SGG was significantly higher and the CSDDm score was significantly lower. Conclusion: Somatic interactive game interventions can improve memory and language function and reduce depression in older patients with dementia, but the impact on cognitive function and ADL needs to be explored. |
Wu et al [ | ]Shandong, China | SGG: 47/94 (50) CG: 47/94 (50) | SGG: 61-80 (71.74) CG: 60-80 (72.65) | Dementia | 12 | Result: Postintervention, the MoCA score of the SGG was higher than that of the CG. Conclusion: Sensory stimulation combined with sensory interaction games can improve cognitive function. |
Savulich et al [ | ]United Kingdom | SGG: 21/42 (50) CG: 21/42 (50) | SGG: 67-82 (75.2) CG: 68-85 (76.9) | Dementia | 4 | Result: Postintervention, the MMSE score of the SGG was higher than that of the CG. Conclusion: Gamification maximizes engagement with cognitive training by increasing motivation and could complement pharmacological treatments for amnestic MCIn and mild AD. |
Swinnen et al [ | ]Belgium | SGG: 23/45 (51) CG: 22/45 (49) | SGG: 79-90 (84.7) CG: 78-91 (85.3) | Dementia | 8 | Result: Postintervention, compared to the CG, the MMSE, MoCA, and DQoL scores of the SG were higher and the CSDD score was significantly lower. Conclusion: Individually adapted exergame training improves lower extremity functioning, cognitive function, and depression in long-term-care facilities. |
Liu et al [ | ]Taipei, China | SGG: 16/33 (48) CG: 17/33 (52) | SGG: 68-80 (74.6) CG: 66-79 (73.4) | Dementia | 12 | Result: Postintervention, the MoCA score of the SGG was higher than that of the CG. Conclusion: Exergaming-based Tai Chi is comparable to traditional Tai Chi for enhancement of cognitive function. |
Thapa et al [ | ]Republic of Korea | SGG: 34/68 (50) CG: 34/68 (50) | SGG: 67-78 (72.6) CG: 67-78 (72.7) | MCI, dementia | 8 | Result: Postintervention, the MMSE score of the SGG was higher than that of the CG. Conclusion: Encouraging patients to perform virtual reality– and game-based training may be beneficial to prevent cognitive decline. |
Oliveira et al [ | ]Portugal | SGG: 10/17 (59) CG: 7/17 (41) | SGG: 77-88 (82.6) CG: 77-90 (84.14) | Dementia | 5 | Result: Postintervention, the MMSE and ADL scores of the SGG were higher than those of the CG. Conclusion: This approach is effective for neurocognitive stimulation in older adults with dementia, contributing to maintaining cognitive function in AD. |
Jahouh et al [ | ]Spain | SGG: 40/80 (50) CG: 40/80 (50) | SGG: 85.05 (8.63) CG: 83.25 (8.78) | MCI | 8 | Result: Postintervention, the MMSE and ADL scores of the SGG were significantly higher and the EGD-15o and EADGp scores were significantly lower than those of the CG. Conclusion: The Wii video console has a positive influence on older people by increasing cognitive ability, enhancing the level of ADL, and improving the psychological status. |
aPublication type: journal paper; study design: randomized controlled trial (RCT); study population: older adults; setting: clinical.
bSGG: serious game group.
cCG: control group.
dK-MMSE: Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination.
eCBT: cognitive behavioral therapy.
fAD: Alzheimer’s disease.
gMoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
hK-MoCA: Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
iDQoL: Dementia Quality of Life.
jSG: serious game.
kADL: activities of daily living.
lMMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination.
mCSDD: Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia.
nMCI: mild cognitive impairment.
oEGD-15: 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale.
pEADG: Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Risk of Bias and Quality Assessment
and show the results of the risk-of-bias assessment. All 14 papers [ - ] described the randomization methods in detail. The blinding method was detailed in 7 (50%) studies: 4 (57%) of these studies were double-blind trials [ , , , ], while 3 (43%) were single-blind trials [ , , ]. The average Jadad score across all included studies was 4.7, indicating fair-to-mild quality.
![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/aa599a587c46c582177af7cc15e9c940.png)
![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/f0346d9a6020de73f55947cfcc99e63c.png)
Meta-Analyses
Cognitive Ability Indicators
Of the 14 studies, 10 (71%) [
, - , , - ] involving 409 (57.3%) older adults (n=272, 66.5%, in the SGG and n=237, 33.5%, in the CG) assessed the effects of SGs on older adults’ cognitive ability based on MMSE scores. Because different evaluation tools were used, the SMD was considered the pooled effect size measure. The pooled results revealed a low degree of heterogeneity among the studies (P=.23, I2=23%), necessitating the use of a random effects model for the meta-analysis. demonstrates that cognitive ability scores in digital SGs significantly increased between the 2 groups under investigation (SMD 2.11, 95% CI 1.42-2.80; P<.001). Of the 14 studies, 5 (36%) [ , , , , ] involving 229 (32.1%) older adults (n=114, 49.8%, in the SGG and n=115, 50.2%, in the CG) assessed the effects of SGs on older adults’ cognitive ability based on MoCA scores. Because different evaluation tools were used, the SMD was considered the pooled effect size measure. The pooled results revealed a low degree of heterogeneity among the studies (P=.33, I2=13%), necessitating the use of a random effects model for the meta-analysis. demonstrates that cognitive ability scores in digital SGs significantly increased between the 2 groups under investigation (SMD 2.75, 95% CI 1.98-3.51; P<.001).![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/add2934893ce197fa78118906a716f3d.png)
![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/7f29df8f4c83b750f9c091e1a7948852.png)
Daily Behavioral Capacity Indicators
Of the 14 studies, 6 (43%) [
, , , , , ] involving 448 (62.7%) older adults (n=225, 50.2%, in the SGG and n=223, 49.8%, in the CG) assessed the effects of SGs on older adults’ daily behavioral capacity based on the Barthel Index, the Katz Index, the Lawton and Brody Index, the K-MBI, and the ADL scale. Because different evaluation tools were used, the SMD was considered the pooled effect size measure. The pooled results revealed significant heterogeneity among the studies (P=.03, I2=91%), necessitating the use of a random effects model for the meta-analysis. demonstrates that daily behavioral capacity scores in digital SGs significantly increased between the 2 groups under investigation (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.06-0.99; P=.03).![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/fcc4edd51c0d764a09263ec19fc6cdc8.png)
Depression Indicators
Of the 14 studies, 4 (29%) [
, , , ] involving 292 (40.9%) older adults (n=145, 49.7%, in the SGG and n=147, 50.3%, in the CG) assessed the effects of SGs on older adults’ depression based on the EADG, the EDG-15, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and the CSDD. Because different evaluation tools were used, the SMD was considered the pooled effect size measure. The pooled results revealed a low degree of heterogeneity among the studies (P<.001, I2=80%), necessitating the use of a random effects model for the meta-analysis. demonstrates that cognitive ability scores in digital SGs significantly increased between the 2 groups under investigation (SMD –2.08, 95% CI –2.94 to 1.22; P<.001).In conclusion, the included studies reported scores on the MMSE, MoCA, the Barthel Index, the Katz Index, the Lawton and Brody Index, the K-MBI, the ADL scale, the EADG, the EDG-15, and the CSDD. A total of 3 outcomes were evaluated: cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression. The SGG had significantly greater total MMSE scores than the CG (SMD 2.11, 95% CI 1.42-2.80; P=.23, I2=23%), as shown in
. The SGG had significantly greater total MoCA scores than the CG (SMD 2.75, 95% CI 1.98-3.51; P=.33, I2=13%), as shown in . In addition, a reduction in daily behavioral capacity indicators was observed based on the Barthel Index, the Katz Index, the Lawton and Brody Index, the K-MBI, and the ADL scale. The SG led to increased daily behavioral capacity scores in the SGG (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.06-0.99; P=.03, I2=91%), as shown in , compared to the CG. The SGG also showed a decrease in depression based on the EADG, the EDG-15, and the CSDD (SMD –2.08, 95% CI –2.94 to –1.25; P<.001, I2=80%), as shown in .![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/da8f76e2a1e24307ebc8b515a8b08da8.png)
Subgroup Analyses
Subgroup analyses of daily behavioral capacity and depression scores were performed based on the country of intervention (outside or within Europe) and the duration of intervention (weeks). For daily behavioral capacity, significant differences were found in the SMD between the 2 subgroups: within Europe (P=.85) [
, , ] and outside Europe (P<.001) [ , , ]. SGs had a significant effect on the outcome in the outside-Europe group (SMD 6.68, 95% CI 5.08-8.28; P<.001), as shown in . For depression, significant differences were found in the SMD between the 2 subgroups: within Europe (P<.001) [ , ] and outside Europe (P=.02) [ , ]. SGs had a significant effect on the outcome in the within-Europe group (SMD –2.08, 95% CI –2.94 to –1.22; P<.001), as shown in . Of the 6 (43%) studies, 4 (67%) [ , , , ] reported a pooled effect of an intervention duration of ≥8 weeks (SMD 0.67, 95% CI 0.19-1.16; P=.007). For the remaining 2 (33%) studies [ , ], the pooled effect within the intervention period was as follows: SMD −1.32, 95% CI −3.05 to −0.42; P=.14. The effects of SGs on daily behavioral capacity during the 2 periods of intervention were significantly different from those in the CG (P<.001), as shown in . For depression, no significant differences were found in the SMD between the 2 groups after >8 weeks (P=.005) [ , ] or <8 weeks (P=.008) [ , ], as shown in . Among the 4 (29%) studies on depression indicators [ , , , ], 2 (50%) [ , ] had a combined effect in an intervention duration of ≥8 weeks (SMD −2.57, 95% CI −4.00 to −1.13; P=.005). For 2 (50%) studies [ , ] in which the intervention duration was <8 weeks, the combined effect within the intervention period was as follows: SMD −4.95, 95% CI −7.84 to −2.07; P=.008. An intervention period of 8 weeks or more had a significant effect on reducing cognitive impairment in older adults ( ). Compared to with the CG, the effects of SGs on depression during the 2 periods of intervention were significantly different, and a significant difference between the 2 groups was found (P<.001), as shown in .![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/e8458899f0bb0dfa9bddf0cd912284f4.png)
![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/d02d5a31702a1724ba0b889738099ed2.png)
![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/ed28846fb72de0c301f2b2034965639d.png)
![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/3a2d4924afccc4d66a6b12df4030f57a.png)
Sensitivity Analysis
In the sensitivity analysis (
), we excluded the study by Yang et al [ ] and observed a significant change in heterogeneity from 91% to 0%. We hypothesized that the outcome of daily behavioral capacity indicators may have been the possible source of heterogeneity in this study. Additional possible reasons included the inclusion of patients, specific treatment modalities, and inconsistencies in clinical indicators between domestic and foreign countries. The patients included and specific treatment modalities, as well as the clinical indicators applied, in this study were as follows: Yang et al [ ], Fujian (China), age 61-83 years; older adults with cognitive impairment, participated in somatosensory interactive games, and completed the MMSE and the ADL scale. All these different factors were possible sources of heterogeneity.Study excluded | Tool used | Heterogeneity analyses | ||
χ² (df) | P value | I2 (%) | ||
Jahouh et al [ | ]Barthel Index | 74.09 (6) | <.001 | 92 |
Jahouh et al [ | ]Katz Index | 61.17 (6) | <.001 | 90 |
Jahouh et al [ | ]Lawton and Brody Index | 74.02 (6) | <.001 | 92 |
Lee et al [ | ]K-MBIa | 74.01 (6) | <.001 | 92 |
Oliveira et al [ | ]IADLb | 74.07 (6) | <.001 | 92 |
Swinnen et al [ | ]ADLc | 69.67 (6) | <.001 | 91 |
Yang et al [ | ]ADL | 5.18 (6) | .52 | 0 |
Zheng et al [ | ]ADL | 73.31 (6) | <.001 | 92 |
aK-MBI: Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index.
bIADL: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living.
cADL: activities of daily living.
Publication Bias
We found that the funnel plots for the MMSE (
a), MoCA ( b), daily behavioral capacity indicators ( c), and depression indicators ( d) were all symmetrical, indicating the absence of publication bias. P>.05 indicated the absence of obvious publication bias. The Begg test (P=.03) and Egger regression (P=.026) also indicated a lack of publication bias.![](https://asset.jmir.pub/assets/e19cc87faf50036b2a62a0ec7f2d84d9.png)
Discussion
Principal Findings
This study systematically evaluated the efficacy of training older adults with cognitive impairment using digital SGs, drawing upon data from 14 studies with a total of 714 participants. Our findings revealed that digital SGs significantly alleviate depression and yield large improvements in cognitive ability and daily behavioral capacity. This suggests that SGs offer a highly effective alternative for older adults with cognitive impairment. Due to statistical heterogeneity, these results should be interpreted with caution. In this study, sensitivity analysis was used to explore the major sources of statistical heterogeneity to determine the impact of a single study on overall risk. The type of intervention (various digital SGs), sample size (range 17-112), intervention duration (range 4-12 weeks), weekly intervention time (range 45-300 minutes/week), type of CG (traditional Taijiquan group, routine health care group, music group), cultural background, measurement tools, or other confounding factors may have caused heterogeneity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis and systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of the 3 outcome indicators of serious gameplay in older adults with cognitive impairment. In this study, SGs were found to significantly increase cognitive ability and daily behavioral capacity and decrease depression.
Previous studies have explored the effects of digital SGs on cognitive ability [
], daily behavioral capacity [ ], and depressive emotion problems [ ] in patients with MCI or AD. However, previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the effects of digital SG therapy on cognitive function [ , - ], daily behavioral capacity [ , ], and depression [ , , - ] in older adults with MCI or AD. This systematic review included the recent literature (2017-2023) and examined 3 indicators of the effects of SGs on cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression among older adults with MCI or AD. Consistent with previous findings, our results indicated positive effects of SGs on MMSE [ ] and CSDD [ , ] scores and negative effects on depression on EDG-15, EADG, and GDS scores. In addition, there was a significant increase in cognitive ability (measured with MoCA) and daily behavioral capacity (measured with the ADL scale, the K-MBI, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale, the Katz Index, the Barthel Index, and the Lawton and Brody Index). This systematic review is the first to simultaneously test the effects of SGs on the 3 indicators of cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression. This systematic review also divided the subgroup analysis of weeks and continental plates, which was not available in previous systematic reviews.SGs are defined as games that are not for entertainment purposes and are mainly used for prevention, education, diagnosis, screening, and rehabilitation [
, ]. The word first appeared in 1968 when Abt [ ] named his new book on SGs. According to Clark’s [ ] proposed treatment, games can exist in a variety of forms, including (1) exergames or video games that require physical exercise as part of playing the games [ , ]; (2) cognitive training games, which aim to maintain or improve users’ cognitive abilities (eg, executive function, memory, learning) [ - ]; (3) computerized CBT games, which are video games that provide CBT to the users; and (4) biofeedback games, which are video games that use electrical sensors attached to the player to receive information about the player’s body state (eg, electrocardiogram sensors) and seek to influence some of the player’s body functions (eg, heart rate). Special care units (SCUs), also known as dementia care units, began to appear in the United States in the 1980s for older adults with dementia [ ]. With an increase in the number of older adults with dementia and the diversification of the demand for dementia care in the market, these SCUs provide not only services to older adults in institutions but also family counseling, care support, and community therapy services to older adults with MCI [ ]. At the policy level, the United States also launched the National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease in 2012, with the goal of preventing and effectively treating AD by 2025 [ ]. The latest SG therapy has also had a positive impact on easing the stress of dementia among older adults in US society [ ]. However, the attention to older patients with MCI and AD in the West is much earlier than in China. Model-based projection data put China’s older adults with dementia at 6.73-15.7 million in 2025; the number of older adults with dementia will increase to 10.018-23.3754 million in 2035 [ ]. China’s Circular on the Promotion of Dementia Prevention and Treatment Action (2023-2025) [ ] formally focuses on groups such as older adults with MCI and AD at the national policy level. Ren et al [ ] found that the 2015 annual treatment cost of patients with AD in China was US $167.74 billion, with ever-rising treatment costs expected to reach US $1.8 trillion by 2050. Older care facilities, social work stations, and counseling services in China may use SGs to carry out nonpharmacological treatments for patients with MCI and AD. This will provide both physical and psychological health improvements to older adults and at the same time reduce the financial burden on China. In traditional Chinese society, positive family and social relationships contribute to physical and mental health [ ]. Due to the “Xiao Dao” culture, this also constitutes a unique social security system for older adults [ , ]. However, rapid industrialization and urbanization have changed these traditional arrangements [ ]. Today, older adults are less likely to live with and interact with younger generations, which has resulted in older adults being isolated [ ]. This has a direct impact on access to social care and financial security and even affects the physical and mental health of older adults [ ]. SGs can provide opportunities for older adults to interact with others [ ] and reduce the negative emotional impact on them [ ]. In addition, the sports elements included in SGs [ ] can exercise older adults’ cognitive ability [ ] and daily behavioral capacity [ ] and may even promote intergenerational relationships [ ]. Our findings also show that SGs can have a positive impact on cognitive ability and daily behavioral capacity and decrease depression in older adults. With this in mind, we suggest that nursing home caregivers, social workers, and psychologists consider using SGs in their work and collaborate with SG professionals to bring benefits to older adults with MCI or AD. This will slow down the cognitive loss in older adults with MCI or AD to a certain extent.Strengths and Limitations
Compared with previous studies [
, , ], this review is the only one to specifically evaluate the effects of SGs on older adults and related types of games. Because the study was conducted in strict accordance with PRISMA guidelines, it was a high-quality, transparent review. Only RCTs were included; this is the most rigorous method of studying causal relationships [ , ]. Therefore, the conclusions of this review are more credible. In this review, there was minimal publication bias. We searched 12 worldwide databases and included research from the United Kingdom, China, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Korea. We also performed forward and backward checks of reference lists, and an all-around search strategy was applied. We searched a database of gray literature without restricting the search to a specific comparator, population, setting, or country, which made the samples more representative. Since all the processes (ie, data extraction, research selection, evidence quality assessment, and bias risk assessment) were independently conducted by 4 reviewers, there was no risk of bias in this review. In addition, because we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method to evaluate the quality of evidence, this review will enable readers to draw more accurate conclusions. Where possible, our statistics integrate data, which will increase not only the power of the research but also estimates of the effects of digital SG therapy on cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression. Moreover, due to the large sample size, we performed a subgroup analysis and a sensitivity analysis. In addition, this review used pre- and postintervention outcome data from each group to evaluate the effectiveness of each meta-analysis. All previous studies have reported the SD and average overall cognitive changes pre- and postintervention in each group. In addition, in these studies, there were significant differences in overall cognition between groups at baseline.The limitations of this study should also be considered. First, due to the design of the systematic review, a causal relationship with a clear structure could not be inferred. Second, the outcome indicators of anxiety (EADG scores) and quality of life (Dementia Quality of Life (DQoL)) were also related to the mental health of older adults with cognitive impairment. However, with only 1 study reporting these findings, a comparison could not be made, so we did not include these indicators. Third, because of the limitations of the designs of the included studies, the randomization and blinding methods used were seldom described in detail. Only 11 studies described the randomization method. In contrast, randomization was only mentioned in other studies, but no explanation of the method used was provided. Blinding was only implemented in 7 studies. Fourth, since many potentially eligible studies were pilot RCTs or quasiexperiments published before 2017 or in languages other than English, we excluded them. As a result, some related research may have been missed. The reason for excluding these studies is that the internal validity of pilot RCTs and quasiexperiments is lower than that of RCTs [
, ]. In addition, we were also unable to translate all the non-English research literature. In our previous review, we found some studies published before 2017. However, serious progress has been made in the field of gaming in the past 7 years, so we did not include RCTs published before 2017. Fifth, this review focused on the short-term effects of SGs. This meta-analysis of pre- and postintervention data did not include follow-up data. We found that follow-up data were reported in only 4 studies, and there was no consistency between the follow-up periods. Therefore, it was impossible to evaluate the long-term effects of SGs on the cognitive ability, mental health, and daily behavioral capacity of older adults. The quality of the evidence in our meta-analysis was average, which may have affected the internal validity of the findings. Sixth, in this review, interest intervention was limited to SGs used as therapeutic interventions on digital platforms, so it would not have been possible to comment on and check the effectiveness of SGs and nondigital SGs used for other purposes, such as monitoring, screening, or diagnosis.Research and Practical Implications
Since the review concentrated on the effectiveness of SGs in improving cognitive ability, daily behavioral capacity, and depression among older adults with cognitive impairment, researchers should evaluate the effectiveness of SGs by performing further reviews of their positive effects on cognitive abilities (eg, processing speed, executive function, learning, memory, speed), daily behavioral capacity (eg, executive function, capacity for reaction, upper limb activity), and mental health (eg, anxiety, stress, sleep quality, quality of life) among people in different age groups. We included some studies from middle-income countries, so the generalizability of the findings of this review may be limited to these countries. As the cultural, social, and economic conditions of middle-income countries are different, additional relevant research should be carried out. To date, only a few studies have assessed the effectiveness of SGs in improving cognitive ability. Therefore, additional research is needed to help draw clearer conclusions about the effectiveness of SGs. Due to the lack of follow-up data, the long-term effects of SGs were not evaluated in this review. To assess the long-term cognitive effects of SGs in a worldwide context, researchers should follow up with participants. A few studies did not report the SD or average global cognitive changes in each group before and after the intervention. In the future, relevant studies need to report this information to evaluate the effect more accurately. Because most of the existing studies have problems reporting results and choosing the randomization process, 8 studies had a low risk of overall bias. Therefore, when developing and reporting on RCTs, researchers should use recommended tools (eg, RoB-2 [
]) and follow recommended guidelines to avoid the aforementioned biases. Many studies have examined the worldwide impact of digital SGs on the cognition of healthy older adults [ ], but this review revealed that only 14 studies have investigated the effects of digital SGs on older adults with cognitive impairment. We hope that researchers can perform additional research in this area to fill this gap.According to the results of this review, SGs, especially digital SGs, exhibit greater effectiveness than a lack of interventions. These findings have meaningful implications for clinical practice since the use of SGs can improve cognitive ability and daily behavioral capacity and decrease depression in older adults with cognitive impairment. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because the quality of the evidence is low in most meta-analyses. Moreover, most of the studies included in this review had some problems in terms of overall bias. Except for 7 studies [
, , - , , ], in all the other included studies, heterogeneity was high and the total effect was not accurate enough. Therefore, before more strong evidence is obtained, psychiatrists and psychologists should consider SGs as a complement to existing interventions rather than a direct substitute. In addition, the number of older persons worldwide will grow exponentially in the next few years, so we can try to use SGs to lighten the burden on the health care system. We can use SGs to improve the physical, psychological, social, and motor functions of older persons with cognitive impairment, thereby improving their quality of life [ , ]. Currently, many old people live alone and have limited social interactions, which can often lead to increased morbidity and mortality [ ]. Older adults can play SGs in a relatively cozy environment (ie, at home), thus promoting their connections with friends and family [ ]. In all the studies, the platforms for SGs were mobile devices (tablets and smartphones). Mobile devices are more popular than game consoles, cheaper than computers, and easier to access; thus, they are particularly popular. As of 2021, there were more than 7.1 billion mobile device users and 15 billion mobile devices worldwide [ ]. Game and app developers can work together to develop SGs aimed at improving the mental health, daily behavior capacity, and cognitive ability of older people. These SGs can be operated and played using mobile devices. A survey of a small number of studies conducted in middle-income countries revealed that these countries seem to prefer SGs more than high-income countries do [ ]. Middle-income countries lack many psychological professionals (currently 1 for every 10 million people). Therefore, more SGs should be developed in middle-income countries to improve the cognitive ability, mental health, and daily behavioral capacity of older persons in those countries.Conclusion
Overall, SGs, particularly digital SGs, may be associated with increased cognitive function and daily behavioral capacity, as well as decreased depression, among older adults with cognitive impairment. However, we are still unable to draw definitive conclusions on the safety and effectiveness of SGs in improving the cognition, behavioral capacity, and mental health of older people with cognitive impairment. This is due to the poor quality of existing meta-analysis evidence, which is mainly caused by concerns about the bias of most studies, the accuracy of the total effect, and the high degree of evidence heterogeneity. Therefore, until more reliable evidence is obtained, psychiatrists, psychologists, patients, and social workers should all regard SGs as a complement to existing interventions rather than a direct substitute. Before SGs are used, their effectiveness and safety should be further reviewed and evaluated, mainly in terms of improving daily behavioral capacity (eg, reaction ability, executive function, upper limb activity) of people with or without cognitive impairment in different age groups, cognitive ability (eg, processing speed, executive function, learning, memory), and mental health aspects (eg, stress, anxiety, sleep quality, quality of life). Further research is needed to assess the safety of SGs, the effects of sports games, and their long-term effects. In the future, further research on methods for increasing the motivation of participants, reducing the rate of missing data, and maintaining the effects of SGs is needed. Second, due to study limitations, it was impossible to perform subgroup analyses for intervention types. Consequently, in-depth and stratified discussions and comparisons of different intervention types were performed. In the coming years, it will be necessary for researchers to perform higher-quality studies with larger samples to verify the effectiveness of SG for older adults with cognitive impairment.
Acknowledgments
We confirm the submission of this manuscript, the key message of the manuscript, and the uniqueness of the study. We express our gratitude to the reviewers for their valuable remarks. We also state that the paper authorship, research, and publication have received financial support from the National Social Science Foundation in China (19BSH161) and the Shenzhen University-Lingnan University Joint Research Programme (2023004).
Data Availability
In this study, the original contributions have been included in the supplementary materials, and further inquiries can be made directly from the corresponding author. No artificial intelligence was used in any portion of the manuscript writing.
All the claims made by this paper represent only those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the claims of the affiliated organizations or reviewers, editors, and publishers. The publisher does not guarantee or endorse any product that may be evaluated by this paper or any claim that may be made by its manufacturer.
Authors' Contributions
XZ and YT managed conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. YC was responsible for conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, and writing—review. ZZ was responsible for data curation, formal analysis, methodology, resources, and writing—original draft.
Conflicts of Interest
None declared.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 abstract checklist.
PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 131 KBPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist.
PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 145 KBSearch strategy.
DOCX File , 14 KBIntervention characteristics.
DOCX File , 25 KBReferences
- Gaidai O, Yakimov V, Balakrishna R. Dementia death rates prediction. BMC Psychiatry. Sep 22, 2023;23(1):691. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, Petersen RC, Ritchie K, Broich K, et al. International Psychogeriatric Association Expert Conference on mild cognitive impairment. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet. Apr 15, 2006;367(9518):1262-1270. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Garre-Olmo J. Epidemiology of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Rev Neurol. Jun 1, 2018;66(11):377-386. [CrossRef]
- Sachdev PS, Blacker D, Blazer DG, Ganguli M, Jeste DV, Paulsen JS, et al. Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach. Nat Rev Neurol. Nov 30, 2014;10(11):634-642. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Nandi A, Counts N, Chen S, Seligman B, Tortorice D, Vigo D, et al. Global and regional projections of the economic burden of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias from 2019 to 2050: a value of statistical life approach. EClinicalMedicine. Sep 2022;51:101580. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Festari C, Massa F, Cotta Ramusino M, Gandolfo F, Nicolosi V, Orini S, et al. European consensus for the diagnosis of MCI and mild dementia: preparatory phase. Alzheimers Dement. May 16, 2023;19(5):1729-1741. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Anderson ND. State of the science on mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CNS Spectr. Jan 17, 2019;24(1):78-87. [CrossRef]
- Jia L, Quan M, Fu Y, Zhao T, Li Y, Wei C, et al. Dementia in China: epidemiology, clinical management, and research advances. Lancet Neurol. Jan 2020;19(1):81-92. [CrossRef]
- Wimo A, Seeher K, Cataldi R, Cyhlarova E, Dielemann JL, Frisell O, et al. The worldwide costs of dementia in 2019. Alzheimers Dement. Jul 08, 2023;19(7):2865-2873. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Jia L, Du Y, Chu L, Zhang Z, Li F, Lyu D, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and management of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults aged 60 years or older in China: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Public Health. Dec 2020;5(12):e661-e671. [CrossRef]
- Ren R, Qi J, Lin S, Liu X, Yin P, Wang Z, et al. The China Alzheimer report 2022. Gen Psychiatr. Mar 11, 2022;35(1):e100751. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lobbia A, Carbone E, Faggian S, Gardini S, Piras F, Spector A, et al. The efficacy of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for people with mild-to-moderate dementia. Eur Psychol. Jul 2019;24(3):257-277. [CrossRef]
- Rubin R. Exploring the relationship between depression and dementia. JAMA. Sep 11, 2018;320(10):961-962. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Arvanitakis Z, Bennett DA. What is dementia? JAMA. Nov 05, 2019;322(17):1728. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Cipriani G, Danti S, Picchi L, Nuti A, Fiorino MD. Daily functioning and dementia. Dement Neuropsychol. Jun 2020;14(2):93-102. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Cloutier S, Chertkow H, Kergoat M, Gélinas I, Gauthier S, Belleville S. Trajectories of decline on instrumental activities of daily living prior to dementia in persons with mild cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. Feb 17, 2021;36(2):314-323. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Xu L, Hsiao H, Denq W, Chi I. Training needs for dementia care in China from the perspectives of mental health providers: who, what, and how. Int Psychogeriatr. Dec 10, 2017;30(7):929-940. [CrossRef]
- Linnemann C, Lang UE. Pathways connecting late-life depression and dementia. Front Pharmacol. Mar 13, 2020;11:279. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Paykel ES. Basic concepts of depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2008;10(3):279-289. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Asad J, Kousar S, Mehmood N. Dementia-related serious games: a comparative study. Univ Sindh J Inf Commun Technol. 2019;3(4):171-177.
- Saragih ID, Everard G, Lee B. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect of serious games on people with dementia. Ageing Res Rev. Dec 2022;82:101740. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Leung DKY, Chan WC, Spector A, Wong GHY. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and apathy symptoms across dementia stages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. Sep 2021;36(9):1330-1344. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bränsvik V, Granvik E, Minthon L, Nordström P, Nägga K. Mortality in patients with behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a registry-based study. Aging Ment Health. Jun 18, 2021;25(6):1101-1109. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lau SJ, Agius H. A framework and immersive serious game for mild cognitive impairment. Multimed Tools Appl. May 31, 2021;80(20):31183-31237. [CrossRef]
- Contreras-Somoza LM, Irazoki E, Toribio-Guzmán JM, de la Torre-Díez I, Diaz-Baquero AA, Parra-Vidales E, et al. Usability and user experience of cognitive intervention technologies for elderly people with MCI or dementia: a systematic review. Front Psychol. Apr 22, 2021;12:636116. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Amjad I, Toor H, Niazi IK, Pervaiz S, Jochumsen M, Shafique M, et al. Xbox 360 Kinect cognitive games improve slowness, complexity of EEG, and cognitive functions in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized control trial. Games Health J. Apr 2019;8(2):144-152. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ng Y, Ma F, Ho FK, Ip P, Fu K. Effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality-enhanced exercise on physical activity, psychological outcomes, and physical performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Comput Hum Behav. Oct 2019;99:278-291. [CrossRef]
- Christogianni A, Bojan K, Mukaetova-Ladinska EB, Sriramm VT, Murth G, Kumarpilla G. Attention and motor skill improvements in mild cognitive impairment patients using COSMA application. Int J Serious Games. Nov 08, 2022;9(4):25-42. [CrossRef]
- Montana JI, Matamala-Gomez M, Maisto M, Mavrodiev PA, Cavalera CM, Diana B, et al. The benefits of emotion regulation interventions in virtual reality for the improvement of wellbeing in adults and older adults: a systematic review. J Clin Med. Feb 12, 2020;9(2):500. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Xue B, Xiao A, Luo X, Li R. The effect of a game training intervention on cognitive functioning and depression symptoms in the elderly with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. Dec 22, 2021;30(4):e1887. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- George W. Children's Play: Grow in the Game. Beijing, China. China Light Industry Press; 2008.
- Dewhirst A, Laugharne R, Shankar R. Therapeutic use of serious games in mental health: scoping review. BJPsych Open. Feb 02, 2022;8(2):e37. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sriwatanathamma P, Sirivesmas V, Simatrang S, Bhowmik NH. Gamifying cognitive behavioral therapy techniques on smartphones for Bangkok's millennials with depressive symptoms: interdisciplinary game development. JMIR Serious Games. May 12, 2023;11:e41638. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Yang Y, Kwak YT. Improvement of cognitive function after computer-based cognitive training in early stage of Alzheimer's dementia. Dement Neurocogn Disord. Mar 2017;16(1):7-11. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kwan RY, Lee D, Lee PH, Tse M, Cheung DS, Thiamwong L, et al. Effects of an mHealth brisk walking intervention on increasing physical activity in older people with cognitive frailty: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. Jul 31, 2020;8(7):e16596. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lim EH, Kim D, Won Y, Park S, Seo J, Ko M, et al. Effects of home based serious game training (Brain Talk™) in the elderly with mild cognitive impairment: randomized, a single-blind, controlled trial. Brain Neurorehabil. Mar 2023;16(1):e4. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lee GJ, Bang HJ, Lee KM, Kong HH, Seo HS, Oh M, et al. A comparison of the effects between 2 computerized cognitive training programs, Bettercog and COMCOG, on elderly patients with MCI and mild dementia: a single-blind randomized controlled study. Medicine (Baltimore). Nov 2018;97(45):e13007. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Yang F. The effect of somatosensory interactive games on patients with Alzheimer's disease. Chin Foreign Med Res. 2021;19(14):126-129. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
- van Santen J, Dröes R-M, Twisk JWR, Blanson Henkemans OA, van Straten A, Meiland FJM. Effects of exergaming on cognitive and social functioning of people with dementia: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. Dec 2020;21(12):1958-1967.e5. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zheng J, Chen X. The effect of Kinect-based somatosensory game on patients with dementia. J Nurs Sci. May 2018;33(9):5. [CrossRef]
- Wu Y, Liu H, Sun D. The application value of sensory stimulation combined with somatosensory interactive games in the care of elderly patients with dementia. Int Med Health Guide. 2021;27(14):2189-2192. [CrossRef]
- Savulich G, Piercy T, Fox C, Suckling J, Rowe JB, O'Brien JT, et al. Cognitive training using a novel memory game on an iPad in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. Aug 01, 2017;20(8):624-633. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Swinnen N, Vandenbulcke M, de Bruin ED, Akkerman R, Stubbs B, Firth J, et al. The efficacy of exergaming in people with major neurocognitive disorder residing in long-term care facilities: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Alzheimers Res Ther. Mar 30, 2021;13(1):70. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Liu C, Cheng F, Wei M, Liao Y. Effects of exergaming-based Tai Chi on cognitive function and dual-task gait performance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized control trial. Front Aging Neurosci. Mar 15, 2022;14:761053. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Thapa N, Park HJ, Yang J, Son H, Jang M, Lee J, et al. The effect of a virtual reality-based intervention program on cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized control trial. J Clin Med. Apr 29, 2020;9(5):1283. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Oliveira J, Gamito P, Souto T, Conde R, Ferreira M, Corotnean T, et al. Virtual reality-based cognitive stimulation on people with mild to moderate dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. May 16, 2021;18(10):5290. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Jahouh M, González-Bernal JJ, González-Santos J, Fernández-Lázaro D, Soto-Cámara R, Mielgo-Ayuso J. Impact of an intervention with Wii video games on the autonomy of activities of daily living and psychological-cognitive components in the institutionalized elderly. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Feb 07, 2021;18(4):1570. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Abd-Alrazaq A, Abuelezz I, AlSaad R, Al-Jafar E, Ahmed A, Aziz S, et al. Serious games for learning among older adults with cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. Apr 12, 2023;25:e43607. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Dewhirst A, Laugharne R, Shankar R. Therapeutic use of serious games in mental health: scoping review. BJPsych Open. Feb 02, 2022;8(2):e37. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bai J, Tang J, Xie Q. Does children’s marriage matter for parents' mental health?Evidence from China. J Asian Econom. Feb 2022;78:101426. [CrossRef]
- Papoutsi C, Drigas A, Skianis C. Serious games for emotional intelligence’s skills development for inner balance and quality of life: a literature review. Retos. Sep 28, 2022;46:199-208. [CrossRef]
- Abd-Alrazaq A, Alhuwail D, Ahmed A, Househ M. Effectiveness of serious games for improving executive functions among older adults with cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Serious Games. Jul 25, 2022;10(3):e36123. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Jones CM, Scholes L, Johnson D, Katsikitis M, Carras MC. Gaming well: links between videogames and flourishing mental health. Front Psychol. Mar 2014;5:260. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Muñoz J, Montoya M, Boger J. From exergames to immersive virtual reality systems: Serious games for supporting older adults. In: Smart Home Technologies and Services for Geriatric Rehabilitation. New York. Academic Press; 2021.
- Wang Y, Wang Z, Liu G, Wang Z, Wang Q, Yan Y, et al. Application of serious games in health care: scoping review and bibliometric analysis. Front Public Health. Jun 10, 2022;10:896974. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Tori AA, Tori R, Nunes FDLDS. Serious game design in health education: a systematic review. IEEE Trans Learning Technol. Dec 1, 2022;15(6):827-846. [CrossRef]
- Abd-Alrazaq A, Alajlani M, Alhuwail D, Toro CT, Giannicchi A, Ahmed A, et al. The effectiveness and safety of serious games for improving cognitive abilities among elderly people with cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Serious Games. Mar 10, 2022;10(1):e34592. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Gonzaga A, Lamas M. Money management: serious games for the elderly. In: Handbook of Research on Promoting Economic and Social Development Through Serious Games. Pennsylvania. IGI Global; 2022.
- De Vidts K. Generic futures and serious games: lessons from 2040 for social innovation in Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Futures Studies. 2023. URL: https://jfsdigital.org/articles-and-essays/2023-2/generic-futures-and-serious-games-lessons-from -2040-for-social-innovation-in-flanders-belgium/ [accessed 2024-07-11]
- Ning H, Li R, Ye X, Zhang Y, Liu L. A review on serious games for dementia care in ageing societies. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2020;8:1400411. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Huang L, Yang Y. The long-term effects of immersive virtual reality reminiscence in people with dementia: longitudinal observational study. JMIR Serious Games. Jul 25, 2022;10(3):e36720. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kleschnitzki JM, Beyer L, Beyer R, Großmann I. The effectiveness of a serious game (MemoreBox) for cognitive functioning among seniors in care facilities: field study. JMIR Serious Games. Apr 01, 2022;10(2):e33169. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wang P, Fang Y, Qi J, Li H. FISHERMAN: a serious game for executive function assessment of older adults. Assessment. Jul 28, 2023;30(5):1499-1513. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bojan K, Stavropoulos TG, Lazarou I, Nikolopoulos S, Kompatsiaris I, Tsolaki M, et al. The effects of playing the COSMA cognitive games in dementia. Int J Serious Games. Mar 09, 2021;8(1):45-58. [CrossRef]
- James S, Conrad M, Sengupta S. Development of an innovative telerehabilitation system to improve handgrip strength. Int J Telerehabil. Dec 13, 2022;14(2):e6497. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Fitzgerald M, Ratcliffe G. Serious serious games, gamification, and serious mental illness: a scoping review. Psychiatr Serv. Feb 01, 2020;71(2):170-183. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Manca M, Paternò F, Santoro C, Zedda E, Braschi C, Franco R, et al. The impact of serious games with humanoid robots on mild cognitive impairment older adults. Int J Hum-Comput Stud. Jan 2021;145:102509. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
- Pacheco TBF, de Medeiros CSP, de Oliveira VHB, Vieira ER, de Cavalcanti FAC. Effectiveness of exergames for improving mobility and balance in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. Jul 18, 2020;9(1):163. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Yu RWL, Chan AHS. Meta-analysis of the effects of game types and devices on older adults-video game interaction: implications for video game training on cognition. Appl Ergon. Oct 2021;96:103477. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Tugwell P, Tovey D. PRISMA 2020. J Clin Epidemiol. Jun 2021;134:A5-A6. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. Mar 29, 2021;372:n71. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Amir-Behghadami M, Janati A. Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. Emerg Med J. Jun 05, 2020;37(6):387-387. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Grey literature database. OPENGREY. URL: https://opengrey.eu/ [accessed 2024-07-10]
- Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. Mar 07, 2014;348(mar07 3):g1687-g1687. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. In: Cooper H, Camic PM, Long DL, Panter AT, Rindskopf D, Sher KJ, editors. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. Vol. 2. Washington, DC. American Psychological Association; 2012.
- Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page M, Elbers R, Sterne J. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. London, UK. Cochrane; 2019:205-228.
- Mohsina S, Gurushankari B, Niranjan R, Sureshkumar S, Sreenath G, Kate V. Assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials in surgery using Jadad score: where do we stand? J Postgrad Med. J Postgrad Med. 2022;68(4):207-212. [CrossRef]
- Harbord RM, Harris RJ, Sterne JAC. Updated tests for small-study effects in meta-analyses. Stata J. Aug 01, 2009;9(2):197-210. [CrossRef]
- Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. Jun 15, 2002;21(11):1539-1558. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data. J R Stat Soc A (Stat Soc). 1988;151(3):419. [CrossRef]
- Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. Sep 13, 1997;315(7109):629-634. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. Jun 24, 2000;56(2):455-463. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sterne J, Becker B, Egger M. The funnel plot. In: Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M, editors. Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Hoboken, NJ. John Wiley & Sons; 2005:73-98.
- Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Oct 03, 2019;10(10):ED000142. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Rathvon D. EndNote X8--citation manager--what's new? UT Southwestern Medical Center. 2017. URL: https://utswmed-ir.tdl.org/items/04c4fae7-b82c-4a72-935b-cc7637d66eb2 [accessed 2024-07-11]
- Padala KP, Padala PR, Lensing SY, Dennis RA, Bopp MM, Roberson PK, et al. Home-based exercise program improves balance and fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults with mild Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;59(2):565-574. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Rica RL, Shimojo GL, Gomes MC, Alonso AC, Pitta RM, Santa-Rosa FA, et al. Effects of a Kinect-based physical training program on body composition, functional fitness and depression in institutionalized older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. Mar 2020;20(3):195-200. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Robert P, Albrengues C, Fabre R, Derreumaux A, Pancrazi MP, Luporsi I, et al. Efficacy of serious exergames in improving neuropsychiatric symptoms in neurocognitive disorders: results of the X-TORP cluster randomized trial. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). May 11, 2021;7(1):e12149. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Min A, Min H, Kim S. Effectiveness of serious games in nurse education: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. Jan 2022;108:105178. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sharifzadeh N, Kharrazi H, Nazari E, Tabesh H, Edalati Khodabandeh M, Heidari S, et al. Health education serious games targeting health care providers, patients, and public health users: scoping review. JMIR Serious Games. Mar 05, 2020;8(1):e13459. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Laver K, Liu E, Clemson L, Davies O, Gray L, Gitlin LN, et al. Does telehealth delivery of a dyadic dementia care program provide a noninferior alternative to face-to-face delivery of the same program? A randomized, controlled trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. Jun 2020;28(6):673-682. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Adomavičienė A, Daunoravičienė K, Kubilius R, Varžaitytė L, Raistenskis J. Influence of new technologies on post-stroke rehabilitation: a comparison of Armeo Spring to the Kinect system. Medicina (Kaunas). Apr 09, 2019;55(4):98. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Tollár J, Nagy F, Hortobágyi T. Vastly different exercise programs similarly improve parkinsonian symptoms: a randomized clinical trial. Gerontology. 2019;65(2):120-127. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Butler O, Herr K, Willmund G, Gallinat J, Kühn S, Zimmermann P. Trauma, treatment and Tetris: video gaming increases hippocampal volume in male patients with combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. Jul 01, 2020;45(4):279-287. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Abd-Alrazaq A, Alhuwail D, Al-Jafar E, Ahmed A, Shuweihdi F, Reagu SM, et al. The effectiveness of serious games in improving memory among older adults with cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Serious Games. Aug 09, 2022;10(3):e35202. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kim Y, Hong S, Choi M. Effects of serious games on depression in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res. Sep 06, 2022;24(9):e37753. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Tong T, Chignell M, Tierney MC, Lee J. A serious game for clinical assessment of cognitive status: validation study. JMIR Serious Games. May 27, 2016;4(1):e7. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zheng J, Yu P, Chen X. An evaluation of the effects of active game play on cognition, quality of life and depression for older people with dementia. Clin Gerontol. Oct 19, 2022;45(4):1034-1043. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Adlakha S, Chhabra D, Shukla P. Effectiveness of gamification for the rehabilitation of neurodegenerative disorders. Chaos, Solitons Fractals. Nov 2020;140:110192. [CrossRef]
- Abd-Alrazaq A, Abuelezz I, Hassan A, AlSammarraie A, Alhuwail D, Irshaidat S, et al. Artificial intelligence-driven serious games in health care: scoping review. JMIR Serious Games. Nov 29, 2022;10(4):e39840. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Abt CC. Serious games. Am Behav Sci. Jul 27, 2016;14(1):129-129. [CrossRef]
- Park-Lee E, Sengupta M, Harris-Kojetin LD. Dementia special care units in residential care communities: United States, 2010. NCHS Data Brief. Nov 2013;(134):1-8. [FREE Full text] [Medline]
- Chaudhury H, Murray K, Seetharaman K. Special care units. In: Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Cham. Springer; 2022:4722-4728.
- Alzheimer's Association National Plan Care Support Milestone Workgroup, Borson S, Boustani MA, Buckwalter KC, Burgio LD, Chodosh J, et al. Report on milestones for care and support under the U.S. National Plan to Address Alzheimer's Disease. Alzheimers Dement. Mar 2016;12(3):334-369. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Li F, Qin W, Zhu M, Jia J. Model-based projection of dementia prevalence in China and worldwide: 2020–2050. J Alzheimers Dis. Aug 17, 2021;82(4):1823-1831. [CrossRef]
- Notice of the General Office of the National Health Commission on launching the Alzheimer's Disease Prevention and Treatment Promotion Action (2023-2025). General Office of the National Health Commission. May 26, 2023. URL: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202306/content_6886277.htm [accessed 2024-07-11]
- Tang D, Lin Z, Chen F. Moving beyond living arrangements: the role of family and friendship ties in promoting mental health for urban and rural older adults in China. Aging Ment Health. Sep 2020;24(9):1523-1532. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bedford O, Yeh KH. History of Chinese indigenous psychology. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford, UK. Oxford University Press; 2020.
- Huang CS. Confucianism and Sacred Space: The Confucius Temple from Imperial China to Today. New York. Columbia University Press; 2021.
- Zhu J, Guo Y. Social justice in spatial change: transition from autonomous rural development to integrated urbanization in China. Cities. Mar 2022;122:103539. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
- Lu N, Spencer M, Sun Q, Lou VWQ. Family social capital and life satisfaction among older adults living alone in urban China: the moderating role of functional health. Aging Ment Health. Apr 03, 2021;25(4):695-702. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ma X, Piao X, Oshio T. Impact of social participation on health among middle-aged and elderly adults: evidence from longitudinal survey data in China. BMC Public Health. Apr 15, 2020;20(1):502. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Fonseca X, Slingerland G, Lukosch S, Brazier F. Designing for meaningful social interaction in digital serious games. Entertainm Comput. Jan 2021;36:100385. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
- Jacobs RS. Serious games: play for change. In: The Video Game Debate 2. London, UK. Routledge; 2020:19-40.
- Caserman P, Hoffmann K, Müller P, Schaub M, Straßburg K, Wiemeyer J, et al. Quality criteria for serious games: serious part, game part, and balance. JMIR Serious Games. Jul 24, 2020;8(3):e19037. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- van der Lubbe LM, Gerritsen C, Klein MCA, Hindriks KV. Empowering vulnerable target groups with serious games and gamification. Entertainm Comput. May 2021;38:100402. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
- Reis L, Mercer K, Boger J. Technologies for fostering intergenerational connectivity and relationships: scoping review and emergent concepts. Technol Soc. Feb 2021;64:101494. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
- Zayeni D, Raynaud J, Revet A. Therapeutic and preventive use of video games in child and adolescent psychiatry: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:36. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- David O, Costescu C, Cardos R, Mogoaşe C. How effective are serious games for promoting mental health and health behavioral change in children and adolescents? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Youth Care Forum. Jul 31, 2020;49(6):817-838. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
- Curley L, Lin J. Randomised controlled trials and pharmacy practice research. Pharm Pract Res Methods. 2020:203-218. [CrossRef]
- Mellis CM. How to choose your study design. J Paediatr Child Health. Jul 2020;56(7):1018-1022. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bärnighausen T, Tugwell P, Røttingen J-A, Shemilt I, Rockers P, Geldsetzer P, et al. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 4: uses and value. J Clin Epidemiol. Sep 2017;89:21-29. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Flannelly KJ, Flannelly LT, Jankowski KRB. Threats to the internal validity of experimental and quasi-experimental research in healthcare. J Health Care Chaplain. Jan 24, 2018;24(3):107-130. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. Aug 28, 2019;366:l4898. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zhu K, Zhang Q, He B, Huang M, Lin R, Li H. Immersive virtual reality-based cognitive intervention for the improvement of cognitive function, depression, and perceived stress in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: pilot pre-post study. JMIR Serious Games. Feb 21, 2022;10(1):e32117. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Sen K, Prybutok G, Prybutok V. The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: a systematic review. SSM Popul Health. Mar 2022;17:101020. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Mobile statistics report, 2021-2025. The Radicati Group. URL: https://www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2021/Mobile_Statistics_Report,_2021-2025_Executive_Summary.pdf [accessed 2024-07-11]
- Wainberg ML, Scorza P, Shultz JM, Helpman L, Mootz JJ, Johnson KA, et al. Challenges and opportunities in global mental health: a research-to-practice perspective. Curr Psychiatry Rep. May 2017;19(5):28. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
Abbreviations
AD: Alzheimer’s disease |
ADL: activities of daily living |
CBT: cognitive behavioral therapy |
CG: control group |
CSDD: Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia |
DQoL: Dementia Quality of Life |
EADG: Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale |
EDG-15: 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale |
GDS: Geriatric Depression Scale |
IADL: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living |
K-MBI: Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index |
MCI: mild cognitive impairment |
MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination |
MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment |
PICOS: Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Design |
PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses |
RCT: randomized controlled trial |
SCU: special care unit |
SG: serious game |
SGG: severe game group |
SMD: standardized mean difference |
Edited by T Leung, A Mavragani; submitted 24.12.23; peer-reviewed by X Zhao; comments to author 09.02.24; revised version received 19.02.24; accepted 26.06.24; published 31.07.24.
Copyright©Xinyi Zuo, Yong Tang, Yifang Chen, Zhimiao Zhou. Originally published in JMIR Serious Games (https://games.jmir.org), 31.07.2024.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Serious Games, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://games.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.